ADVERTISEMENT

CFP Rankings need an adjustment:

instaGATOR

Bull Gator
May 29, 2001
25,313
12,642
113
Currently it's: 4 Bama - 5 ND - 10 UF.

What it should be is 4 UF, 5 Bama, and 10 ND.

#18 Ole Miss 43 - 37 @ #4 Bama (-6)

And the following week:
#18 Ole Miss 10 - 38 @ #10 UF (+28)

Stop with all of the Bama/Saban azz-kissing BS.

Look at the actual on the field mutual opponent record!
#10 UF has lost 1 game @ undefeated #2 LSU
#4 Bama lost @ home to #18 Ole Miss, that UF beat by 4 TD's the following week.

* IF Bama beats LSU, then they would deserve to move up ahead of UF.

As to the always media-moron pumped-up neutered lame....

W Tx 3-5, 2-3 Big12
W Va 3-5, 2-2 ACC
W GaTech 3-6, 1-5 ACC
W U-Mass 1-7, 0-4 Mid-Amer
L #1 Clem 8-0, 5-0 ACC >>> They lost to the only really good team they've played.
W Navy 6-1, 4-0 AAC (ECa = AAC)
W #22 Temple 7-1, 4-0 AAC
ND has 2 wins over winning record AAC teams, so #10 at best.
What remains for ND?
------------------

NR Pitt 6-2, 4-1 ACC
NR WF 3-6, 1-5 ACC
NR BC 3-6, 0-6 ACC
#11 Stan 7-1, 6-0 PAC 12

* #11 Stanford lost to #21 NW.
NW then lost 0-38 #17 Mich, and 10-40 #9 Iowa.


Hopefully, it will all sort itself out by Dec's final poll, but they didn't start off very well IMOHO. o_O
 
Last edited:
Relax. It's only the first week. Still have 4-5 weeks to play. It will work itself out .... hopefully :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: sadgator
Relax. It's only the first week. Still have 4-5 weeks to play. It will work itself out .... hopefully :)

I am relaxed, I've been a Gator fan since SOS was our QB, not the HBC.

I simply pointed out their worst as it related to my own team, but I finished my post with:

"Hopefully, it will all sort itself out by Dec's final poll, but they didn't start off very well IMOHO." o_O
 
Well for one, because this method of ranking is so fluid, it doesn't really matter.

What does matter is that #2 LSU faces #4 Alabama this weekend.

What matters is that Florida doesn't have any major match ups for the next three games and will be expected to be 10-1 going into the FSU game.

They are definitely looking at the upcoming match ups when they put out these rankings.
 
Let me cook it down for ya.

1. UF should be ranked ahead of both Bama and neutered lame.
(by mutual opponent for UA, and by SoS for NL)
* Therefore their method of ranking is bs imo.


2. I simply pointed out their worst as it related to my own team, which is what matters to me. What matters to others is their own problem as far as I'm concerned.

3. "Hopefully, it will all sort itself out by Dec's final poll, but they didn't start off very well IMOHO." o_O

Finally, does anyone really believe that both UA and NL should have been ranked ahead of UF, on the basis of the actual games played so far?
That was the point... o_O
 
Currently it's: 4 Bama - 5 ND - 10 UF.

What it should be is 4 UF, 5 Bama, and 10 ND.

#18 Ole Miss 43 - 37 @ #4 Bama (-6)

And the following week:
#18 Ole Miss 10 - 38 @ #10 UF (+28)

Stop with all of the Bama/Saban azz-kissing BS.

Look at the actual on the field mutual opponent record!
#10 UF has lost 1 game @ undefeated #2 LSU
#4 Bama lost @ home to #18 Ole Miss, that UF beat by 4 TD's the following week.

* IF Bama beats LSU, then they would deserve to move up ahead of UF.

As to the always media-moron pumped-up neutered lame....

W Tx 3-5, 2-3 Big12
W Va 3-5, 2-2 ACC
W GaTech 3-6, 1-5 ACC
W U-Mass 1-7, 0-4 Mid-Amer
L #1 Clem 8-0, 5-0 ACC >>> They lost to the only really good team they've played.
W Navy 6-1, 4-0 AAC (ECa = AAC)
W #22 Temple 7-1, 4-0 AAC
ND has 2 wins over winning record AAC teams, so #10 at best.
What remains for ND?
------------------

NR Pitt 6-2, 4-1 ACC
NR WF 3-6, 1-5 ACC
NR BC 3-6, 0-6 ACC
#11 Stan 7-1, 6-0 PAC 12

* #11 Stanford lost to #21 NW.
NW then lost 0-38 #17 Mich, and 10-40 #9 Iowa.


Hopefully, it will all sort itself out by Dec's final poll, but they didn't start off very well IMOHO. o_O
I get it bro and I agree bit most of this will all sorry it's self out....even after the season the championship conference games will change things. ..if things are f'ed after that asks I'm sure there will be some mess then it will be time to raise hell.
 
This why the NCAA needs to do away with bowl games and go with a pure playoff system. Congress needs to step in AGAIN and fix the crappy system in place.
 
I think we should be ranked above Bama and ND. UGA win doesn't look as good for both as some might of thought at the first of the year, Tenn seems to be a good win for both, A&M doesn't look as impressive of a win as it did when they played. We have a better loss then Bama and a better win, but this weekend will show for sure. ND should of got beat by 30 to Clemson but they seemed the let off the gas. USC looks like a better win now then at first. Temple is probably their most impressive win. But in the end it doesn't really matter. If we can win out we are "in" and if we don't then all this wont matter any way.
 
Where it ends up,,, is where it ends up.... :rolleyes:

My only bitch was where they (committee) started it off at. :confused:

And the Congress FIXING ANYTHING? WTF??? >>> :D:D:D:D:D:D

Better to rely on Vegas Bookies, because they can 'FIX' most anything! o_O
 
They always give Bama the benefit of the doubt. Once they beat LSU this weekend they will probably be no. 1.
 
They always give Bama the benefit of the doubt. Once they beat LSU this weekend they will probably be no. 1.

Which is kinda strange, since Bama is the most NCAA cheater penalized team in SEC Football History.... :confused: (kensucky owns that accomplishment in SEC B-Ball) :oops:
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT