ADVERTISEMENT

Breaking: Republican Senators have arrived

I am not overly confident. There are a few scenarios.

1.) Congress does the right thing and throws out the contested states and vote Trump in.
2.) Congress does the dog and pony show and let Biden steal the WH
3.) Trump has some legal trickery that shuts it all down and creates chaos postponing the eventual theft.
4.) the patriots storm the gates, give no quarter to the thieves and the tree of liberty is watered.

1 is preferred, 2 is most likely and I would hate to see any patriots die but would shed no tears for the swamp creatures.
 
Anyone want to say that's what will happen? @sadgator? @Uniformed_ReRe[/USER[/QUOTE]

sadgator will play...

nothing Pence (or the objecting GOP numbskulls) does (or doesn’t do) will have any negative consequence as far as Congress certifying the electoral college votes in favor of Biden...period....end of story...100%....good night...see ya later...turn out the lights...sayonara..,the party’s over...done...

you are going to be very disappointed Ghost...

this is the 2020 impeachment 101...all over again...

apparently somebody forgot to teach these idiots...and Ghost...the first rule of politics...how to count...

sadgator’ll go on record...and “keep watching”...

Have fun everybody...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nolec
What happens next is that on Jan.6th this silly posturing will be over. Cruz's little ploy is not in the Constitution election process, he's simply calling for an investigation, that's fine since it does not involve Congress's duty on 1/6. There are zero state legislature approved alternate electors to approve, only the already approved slate from the EC. All 306 of them. You lose. Welcher desperately grasping at any straws. Send Trump more money. LOL
Then case in point, you do not understand the Constitution of the United States
 
sadgator will play...

nothing Pence (or the objecting GOP numbskulls) does (or doesn’t do) will have any negative consequence as far as Congress certifying the electoral college votes in favor of Biden...period....end of story...100%....good night...see ya later...turn out the lights...sayonara..,the party’s over...done...

you are going to be very disappointed Ghost...

this is the 2020 impeachment 101...all over again...

apparently somebody forgot to teach these idiots...and Ghost...the first rule of politics...how to count...

sadgator’ll go on record...and “keep watching”...

Have fun everybody...

So you have no idea what Pence can or will do, you just know that the rigging of the election by the dems will go on, unabated. Ok, noted.
 
Nothing aside from preside over the process and periodically acknowledge when an objection has been submitted to announce a break for deliberations.

I don’t think he will attempt a unilateral motion to reject electors, which I assume is what you are getting at.

Pence has multiple options and things he could do. I just wanted to know if you sheep think he will exercise any of those options, or if you're saying he's just there in a ceremonial role.

As I said, this will be an educational week for many.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: sadgator
Then case in point, you do not understand the Constitution of the United States

Far more than your erudite explanation of what Pence can do. You and welcher seem to think that the Constitution is not designed for the states, not Congress to select the WH. The States have selected their electors and certified them, There are no state legislature approved alternates, therefore Pence is only charged with presenting the EC vote to Congress. Congress has the ability to contest, and if so, this diversion will be shortly decided (2 hrs). I'd enjoy the laugh if welcher or you want to describe a different Constitutional process, so please do.
 
Last edited:
Far more than your erudite explanation of what Pence can do. You and welcher seem to think that the Constitution is not designed for the states, not Congress to select the WH. The States have selected their electors and certified them, There are no state legislature approved alternates, therefore Pence is only charged with presenting the EC vote to Congress. Congress has the ability to contest, and if so, this diversion will be shortly decided (2 hrs). I'd enjoy the laugh if welcher or you want to describe a different Constitutional process, so please do.
Sometimes your diatribe is exhausting. One member from the Senate and the House can object t the electorate. If Pence believes that there is fraud, he can call for a 10 day delay to allow an investigation. Where do you think Powell, Guliani, Wood and any other person who’s been working on this case has been? Also, this isn’t a court of law so new evidence can be provided as well.

Pence can then accept or reject the EC votes for any particular state. Once both candidates goes under 270, it becomes a contested election where the House and Senate will vote.
 
Pence does have constitutional authority to do more. That said, he won’t . It’s going to have to come from elsewhere

There is a reason folks like the NY Times are getting interviews with him. He is and has been RINO. He is a career politician who is scurred shatless by the media
 
Sometimes your diatribe is exhausting. One member from the Senate and the House can object t the electorate. If Pence believes that there is fraud, he can call for a 10 day delay to allow an investigation. Where do you think Powell, Guliani, Wood and any other person who’s been working on this case has been? Also, this isn’t a court of law so new evidence can be provided as well.

Pence can then accept or reject the EC votes for any particular state. Once both candidates goes under 270, it becomes a contested election where the House and Senate will vote.

Pence has no authority to delay for investigation, Peter Navarro made that up and it's false. Pence is not allowed to decide to reject any states' certified electors, he may recognize a state's legislature approved alternate electors but the Const. does NOT allow the VP to throw out a states votes at his choosing. You must be kidding. You are claiming a VP can decide " I want our group to keep the WH, so I'll just throw out states." LOL Not in our Constitution.
 
Even assuming the flawed process you describe were to happen, which it won’t,

How’s that vote total lookin’ at the moment? Lol...

Good luck...

I can't even.... @sadgator if neither candidate gets a majority of the EVs and the House has to vote on who the President is, Trump wins.

I know that doesn't sound right to you. It's because you have no idea how the voting works. This is why I don't waste my time trying to argue with the sheep.
 
Pence has no authority to delay for investigation

Not sure if Pence has that authority, but it can be done. A 10-day audit of the election can be done.

Pence can also pick which slate of electors is legitimate, as Nixon did in 1960. Or he can refuse to pick either slate, and kick it back to the states and tell them to give him one slate of electors to use.

Sheep getting an introduction to the US Constitution this week.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: sadgator


Does Pres Trump have better access to information than the sheep here?

Is he smarter than the sheep here? Does he know VP Pence better than the sheep here?

Logical thinking.
 


Does Pres Trump have better access to information than the sheep here?

Is he smarter than the sheep here? Does he know VP Pence better than the sheep here?

Logical thinking.
That's probably why the Trumpsters have been so successful in the courts. LOL But at least they are very consistent. 60 judges, many appointed by Trump , have all but laughed them out of court. Circling the drain.
 
Not sure if Pence has that authority, but it can be done. A 10-day audit of the election can be done.

Pence can also pick which slate of electors is legitimate, as Nixon did in 1960. Or he can refuse to pick either slate, and kick it back to the states and tell them to give him one slate of electors to use.

Sheep getting an introduction to the US Constitution this week.

There is only one slate the states sent, so that's not an option.
Navarro invented this bogus window, also saying we don't have to have a President sworn in on the 20th. The Constitution states otherwise, Navarro is a joke "trade adviser". Gettin' desperate there, welcher. LOL
 
Guess it depends on the definition of fraud. But if the rules set in place by state legislatures were overridden or ignored by othe government agencies/actors then the electors are unconstitutional, PERIOD. Call it whatever you want they are technically not valid. This occurred in Ga and Pa for sure.

As for the rest that I have seen reported like ballots taken out from under a table, people voting that had moved, statistical anomalies, etc. I have little doubt that illegalities occurred as well.

Tapper is a tool and anyone who believes him is a fool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
Nixon did precisely this in 1960.
Really? Nixon did not decide to to reject certified electors alone. There were two sets D and R from Hawaii because of a COURT ruled recount pushing the state's EC . ( this year there is only one set from each state). Nixon asked for unanimous consent to decide for the Democrat slate ( we was R). The court ruled recount had the D ahead at the end.
 
We can compare big O’s record if you’d like. He did sell guns to terrorists, that’s pretty bad just to name one.
Not only terrorists but drug cartels. Then his AG ran cover for him. If Trump had a "wingman" AG like Holder was, Obama, Clinton, and Biden would all be in leg irons by now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BillCutting4585


Sheep can we get you on the record now? Who thinks this will simply be a vote to confirm the election was rigged on Weds and oh well, Hiden stole it, nothing can be done?

Anyone want to say that's what will happen? @sadgator? @Uniformed_ReRe?

Asking for me and my bowl of popcorn.
Ghost my man you at it again?! Lol man tighten up! Trump needs 11,780 votes up in jawja! Help that MoFo out bro!
 
  • Like
Reactions: sadgator
What about obama, just another asshole?

If by “spying” you mean that he was POTUS when the intelligence agencies started a counterintelligence operation in response to Trump associates meeting with Russian agents and then attempting to arrange the transfer of damaging information about Trump’s political rival from said Russian agents, sure.
 
in response to Trump associates meeting with Russian agents and then attempting to arrange the transfer of damaging information about Trump’s political rival from said Russian agents, sure.

No idea what you are talking about. I know that Hillary colluded with UK and Russian sources to create the fake Steele Dossier, is that what you mean?

I am talking about when the head of the NSA met with Trump and told him that Trump Tower was bugged, and that obama's IC did it.

Also, why did obama also spy on Cruz?
 
You have no idea about George Papadopoulos? That’s odd considering that it was his actions that triggered the investigation.

I know all about George Papa. Still have no idea what you are talking about.

Who are the Russian agents he supposedly met? What is this 'damaging information' that he was attempting to arrange the transfer of?

Goodness. Just typing that out, it sounds like a crackpot conspiracy theory. I hope you can document this.
 
I know all about George Papa. Still have no idea what you are talking about.

Who are the Russian agents he supposedly met? What is this 'damaging information' that he was attempting to arrange the transfer of?

Goodness. Just typing that out, it sounds like a crackpot conspiracy theory. I hope you can document this.
And the fact that they have Papa G on tape denying ever talking to any Russians about any dirt on Hillary and still tried going after him.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT