While taking extra time to screen shot CNN reports and creating lame memes.
BREAKING: DOJ begs federal judge to keep affidavit on Trump raid sealed
- Thread starter GhostOfMatchesMalone
- Start date
FBI..........the most trusted agency in history, EVA! 
www.thegatewaypundit.com
FBI Agent Pleads Guilty to Destroying Evidence to Frame Pro-Trump Political Prisoner | The Gateway Pundit | by Benjamin Wetmore
Former Arkansas State Senator Jon Woods was the first elected official in the state to endorse President Trump in 2016.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Uh toe. SumTing Wong for the DOJ here.
On August 4, 2022, President Trump’s team filed an opposition against Hillary Clinton’s earlier motion to dismiss the RICO complaint (Clinton claimed the president failed to state a claim). His counsel also answered in opposition to motions to dismiss four other defendants.
Judge Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart – of Jeffrey Epstein’s defense – signed off on the Mar-a-Lago warrant for the U.S. District of Southern Florida 44 days after recusing himself from the RICO case against Hillary Clinton et al.
It’s now believed that the dirty cops were there at Mar-a-Lago to steal documents from the President that he declassified so they can then turn around and prevent the documents from seeing the light of day by claiming they’re part of an ongoing investigation.
The clustering of these events is significant because the warrant for the Mar-a-Lago raid was requested/issued on the next day, August 5, 2022.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
The dots are coming together............
On August 4, 2022, President Trump’s team filed an opposition against Hillary Clinton’s earlier motion to dismiss the RICO complaint (Clinton claimed the president failed to state a claim). His counsel also answered in opposition to motions to dismiss four other defendants.
Judge Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart – of Jeffrey Epstein’s defense – signed off on the Mar-a-Lago warrant for the U.S. District of Southern Florida 44 days after recusing himself from the RICO case against Hillary Clinton et al.
It’s now believed that the dirty cops were there at Mar-a-Lago to steal documents from the President that he declassified so they can then turn around and prevent the documents from seeing the light of day by claiming they’re part of an ongoing investigation.
The clustering of these events is significant because the warrant for the Mar-a-Lago raid was requested/issued on the next day, August 5, 2022.
CRIMSON RHINO and The Raid on Mar-a-Lago
In May 2022 the Michael Sussman Trial was rocked by the revelation of the “Crimson Rhino” file. This file that was first discussed at the Sussman trial was reportedly the basis for the investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign. And Sussman was the link between the Hillary Clinton campaign and...
www.thegatewaypundit.com
The dots are coming together............
This is why some people believe Christopher Wray is working with Trump. Logically it makes sense given what a collosal disaster this is becoming for the FBI.Uh toe. SumTing Wong for the DOJ here.
On August 4, 2022, President Trump’s team filed an opposition against Hillary Clinton’s earlier motion to dismiss the RICO complaint (Clinton claimed the president failed to state a claim). His counsel also answered in opposition to motions to dismiss four other defendants.
Judge Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart – of Jeffrey Epstein’s defense – signed off on the Mar-a-Lago warrant for the U.S. District of Southern Florida 44 days after recusing himself from the RICO case against Hillary Clinton et al.
It’s now believed that the dirty cops were there at Mar-a-Lago to steal documents from the President that he declassified so they can then turn around and prevent the documents from seeing the light of day by claiming they’re part of an ongoing investigation.
The clustering of these events is significant because the warrant for the Mar-a-Lago raid was requested/issued on the next day, August 5, 2022.
CRIMSON RHINO and The Raid on Mar-a-Lago
In May 2022 the Michael Sussman Trial was rocked by the revelation of the “Crimson Rhino” file. This file that was first discussed at the Sussman trial was reportedly the basis for the investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign. And Sussman was the link between the Hillary Clinton campaign and...
The dots are coming together............
But remember.....the walls are closing in on Trump LOL Did we ever figure out who's sock @Illegal-shift is?
Well the Rivals Ignore feature failed me again, I caught a sneak at @RayGravesGhost crying about how he's being picked on (by being treated equally) and was last seen pricing one-way flights to Chile. Suck it up, Buttercup.
Maybe myself, @NavigatorII , @gatordad3 ripped his ass that bad about his Salon/Vanity Fair/Cosmopolitan news articles so much even he started believing he was "transitioning."🤣🤣🤣
"Salon" What a joke. Article from Politico about them, and Politico leans left AF.
Over the last several months, POLITICO has interviewed more than two dozen current and former Salon employees and reviewed years of Salon’s SEC filings. On Monday, after POLITICO had made several unsuccessful attempts to interview Salon CEO Cindy Jeffers, the company dropped a bombshell: Jeffers was leaving the company effective immediately in what was described as an “abrupt departure.”
While the details of Salon’s enormous management and business challenges dominate the internal discussion at the magazine, in liberal intellectual and media circles it is widely believed that the site has lost its way.
“I remember during the Bush years reading them relatively religiously,” Neera Tanden, the president of the Center for American Progress, told POLITICO. “Especially over the last year, they seem to have completely jumped the shark in so many ways. They’ve become — and I think this is sad — they’ve definitely become like a joke, which is terrible for people who care about these progressive institutions.”
“The low point arrived when my editor G-chatted me with the observation that our traffic figures were lagging that day and ordered me to ‘publish something within the hour,’” Andrew Leonard, who left Salon in 2014, recalled in a post. “Which, translated into my new reality, meant ‘Go troll Twitter for something to get mad about — Uber, or Mark Zuckerberg, or Tea Party Republicans — and then produce a rant about it.’
That means mentally-ill goons came along and took over. Nowadays, they publish the usual leftist rhetoric and lies to go along with the radicals. The Atlantic, New Yorker, and others are all the same. It really is sad when lifestyle magazines turn into neo-Nazi propganda trash."Salon" What a joke. Article from Politico about them, and Politico leans left AF.
Over the last several months, POLITICO has interviewed more than two dozen current and former Salon employees and reviewed years of Salon’s SEC filings. On Monday, after POLITICO had made several unsuccessful attempts to interview Salon CEO Cindy Jeffers, the company dropped a bombshell: Jeffers was leaving the company effective immediately in what was described as an “abrupt departure.”
While the details of Salon’s enormous management and business challenges dominate the internal discussion at the magazine, in liberal intellectual and media circles it is widely believed that the site has lost its way.
“I remember during the Bush years reading them relatively religiously,” Neera Tanden, the president of the Center for American Progress, told POLITICO. “Especially over the last year, they seem to have completely jumped the shark in so many ways. They’ve become — and I think this is sad — they’ve definitely become like a joke, which is terrible for people who care about these progressive institutions.”
“The low point arrived when my editor G-chatted me with the observation that our traffic figures were lagging that day and ordered me to ‘publish something within the hour,’” Andrew Leonard, who left Salon in 2014, recalled in a post. “Which, translated into my new reality, meant ‘Go troll Twitter for something to get mad about — Uber, or Mark Zuckerberg, or Tea Party Republicans — and then produce a rant about it.’
Help me here...if Trump declassified these docs as he claims and they are a smoking gun regarding the Russia hoax, would he and his counsel not xerox these docs and have them in at least triplicate with also a digitized copy? Heck since they are declassed why not have a 4th copy somewhere in a vault at Iron Mountain! If that is the case the raid to seize the dos to prevent them "seeing the light of day" would be/ will be a failure.
Someone needs to tell Hillary that wiping hard drives involved in an investigation is a crime.FBI..........the most trusted agency in history, EVA!
FBI Agent Pleads Guilty to Destroying Evidence to Frame Pro-Trump Political Prisoner | The Gateway Pundit | by Benjamin Wetmore
Former Arkansas State Senator Jon Woods was the first elected official in the state to endorse President Trump in 2016.
And the FBI needs to be dismantled. It’s a cesspool.
The funny part is ray ray, a known Pedo supporter, believes that Salon is the Bible."Salon" What a joke. Article from Politico about them, and Politico leans left AF.
Over the last several months, POLITICO has interviewed more than two dozen current and former Salon employees and reviewed years of Salon’s SEC filings. On Monday, after POLITICO had made several unsuccessful attempts to interview Salon CEO Cindy Jeffers, the company dropped a bombshell: Jeffers was leaving the company effective immediately in what was described as an “abrupt departure.”
While the details of Salon’s enormous management and business challenges dominate the internal discussion at the magazine, in liberal intellectual and media circles it is widely believed that the site has lost its way.
“I remember during the Bush years reading them relatively religiously,” Neera Tanden, the president of the Center for American Progress, told POLITICO. “Especially over the last year, they seem to have completely jumped the shark in so many ways. They’ve become — and I think this is sad — they’ve definitely become like a joke, which is terrible for people who care about these progressive institutions.”
“The low point arrived when my editor G-chatted me with the observation that our traffic figures were lagging that day and ordered me to ‘publish something within the hour,’” Andrew Leonard, who left Salon in 2014, recalled in a post. “Which, translated into my new reality, meant ‘Go troll Twitter for something to get mad about — Uber, or Mark Zuckerberg, or Tea Party Republicans — and then produce a rant about it.’
Talk about being a sheeple
Last edited:
That type of content creates the morons we have posting here.
Damn. We'll see @BSC911's UF degrees before we see that unredacted warrant, won't we?
We’re still waiting to see yours. But little tree stump bots don’t get those I suppose?
I remember posting my FL CPA certificate here (redacted, of course. I'm not as dumb as BScuck posting fake photos of mythical fish and boats). I think it's time . Show and tell. I showed, now it's his turn to tell.
That's up to him. Just pointing out the real reason for the college thread, he gets off on the idea that some posters here might believe he actually went to UF.
I mean, if a middle-aged man is still wanting to discuss college as an accomplishment, that kinda says it all.
I'll ask again @RayGravesGhost: Has our President Trump ever made a claim that wasn't later proven true?
Yes. As recently as the FBI search of Mar-A-Lago...
Claimed no one was allowed to observe the FBI operation
We now know he watched the entire operation via CCTV
Claimed no one had the search warrant
We now know he & his lawyers were served before the search and have had a copy of the whole time
Need more?
Claimed no one was allowed to observe the FBI operation
We now know he watched the entire operation via CCTV
Claimed no one had the search warrant
We now know he & his lawyers were served before the search and have had a copy of the whole time
Need more?
Time to throw something else against the wall to see if it sticks 🤣
https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-hints-legal-action-093340145.html
Donald Trump hints at legal action over Mar-a-Lago raid. Lawyers are already finding fault with his Fourth Amendment defense.
Joshua Zitser
Sat, August 20, 2022 at 5:33 AM·2 min read
In a post on Truth Social, on Friday night, Trump said that a "major motion" related to the Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, will soon be filed.
Earlier this month, the FBI executed a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago, the former president's home in Palm Beach, Florida. Legal experts determined that significant evidence must have backed up the warrant authorizing the search.
Unsealed court documents showed that the search was part of an investigation into whether Trump had violated three laws, including a significant facet of the Espionage Act, relating to the treatment of government documents.
Trump and his allies have denounced the FBI search, characterizing it as a political attack, despite it being signed off by a federal judge and approved by Attorney General Merrick Garland.
Nonetheless, Trump continued his attacks on the Justice Department in his Friday night Truth Social post, describing the raid as an "illegal break-in" of his home.
The former president argued that his rights, and the rights of all Americans, were "violated at a level rarely seen before in our country."
Though the "major motion" is yet to be filed, lawyers are already saying his Fourth Amendment defense would likely fail.
The Daily Beast reported that legal experts used Twitter to cast doubt on the motion.
"Trump promises a 'major motion pertaining to the 4th Am' re MAL search," wrote former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Harry Litman. "Presumably, he means a motion to suppress evidence, which people file once charged (but not before), & he'll surely lose."
And University of Texas Law professor Steve Vladeck wrote: "Wait until he finds out that SCOTUS has made it virtually impossible to sue federal law enforcement officers for even egregious violations of the Fourth Amendment."
Trump's post-presidency office did not immediately respond to Insider's request for comment.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-hints-legal-action-093340145.html
Donald Trump hints at legal action over Mar-a-Lago raid. Lawyers are already finding fault with his Fourth Amendment defense.
Joshua Zitser
Sat, August 20, 2022 at 5:33 AM·2 min read
- On Friday night, former President Donald Trump hinted at legal action concerning the Mar-a-Lago raid.
- He said a "major motion" related to the Fourth Amendment would soon be filed.
- According to the Daily Beast, lawyers are already tearing apart the Fourth Amendment defense.
In a post on Truth Social, on Friday night, Trump said that a "major motion" related to the Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, will soon be filed.
Earlier this month, the FBI executed a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago, the former president's home in Palm Beach, Florida. Legal experts determined that significant evidence must have backed up the warrant authorizing the search.
Unsealed court documents showed that the search was part of an investigation into whether Trump had violated three laws, including a significant facet of the Espionage Act, relating to the treatment of government documents.
Trump and his allies have denounced the FBI search, characterizing it as a political attack, despite it being signed off by a federal judge and approved by Attorney General Merrick Garland.
Nonetheless, Trump continued his attacks on the Justice Department in his Friday night Truth Social post, describing the raid as an "illegal break-in" of his home.
The former president argued that his rights, and the rights of all Americans, were "violated at a level rarely seen before in our country."
The Fourth Amendment
According to the Library of Congress, the Fourth Amendment is, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."Though the "major motion" is yet to be filed, lawyers are already saying his Fourth Amendment defense would likely fail.
The Daily Beast reported that legal experts used Twitter to cast doubt on the motion.
"Trump promises a 'major motion pertaining to the 4th Am' re MAL search," wrote former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Harry Litman. "Presumably, he means a motion to suppress evidence, which people file once charged (but not before), & he'll surely lose."
And University of Texas Law professor Steve Vladeck wrote: "Wait until he finds out that SCOTUS has made it virtually impossible to sue federal law enforcement officers for even egregious violations of the Fourth Amendment."
Trump's post-presidency office did not immediately respond to Insider's request for comment.
Teachable moment on the difference between dems and the rest of us. We all can see that this young man has a mental illness.
Dems see a hero.
But if Trump had hired him, every Trump supporter here would have said he was insane. For many of us, it would have been a dealbreaker and we would have dropped support for him.
Dems would have said "Hey! This Trump guy finally got something right!"
Dems let their politics be their moral compass. The rest of us know right is always right, and wrong is always wrong.
Wow. Talk about total delusion. One day we'll wake up and that pedo ice cream truck driver will be behind bars for child molestation. Watch and hide!
Similar threads
