Insta is the most prolific poster here and half his posts are him claiming that a poster isn't worth paying attention to.
It will certainly boostvyoue list count.
He's obsessed.
Insta is the most prolific poster here and half his posts are him claiming that a poster isn't worth paying attention to.
Gotta spend money to make money. Bama's facilities are already state of the art, but Byrne knows if you're not spending to stay ahead, you're spending to catch up. Bama would rather stay ahead.
Topic for another day, but all these massive amounts of money just make it all the more sillier that the athletes can't get a cut of this.
Guess you mean besides a scholarship that is worth over 100k over 4 years?
Guess you mean besides a scholarship that is worth over 100k over 4 years?
As shown above, your math is wrong, but assuming it's correct, yes, I mean above the scholarship.
According to USA Today, Alabama football made a profit of $46 Million last year. http://sports.usatoday.com/2018/01/27/alabama-football-turned-46m-profit-in-201617/
FYI, the $46 Million profit is AFTER coaches salaries, of course.
The players and the coaches made that $46 Million profit possible. The coaches are getting paid millions, the players are getting a scholarship.
Seems the players are the ones getting the short end of the stick. More could be done for them.
The large majority of programs take home a profit, don’t let fudging of the numbers fool you. They only ‘lose’ money after being forced to support other non-revenue producing sports. So ironically, the guys who advocate a free market don’t really want a free market at all. Because in a free market sports who lost millions of dollars every year would not survive and that’s basically what’s happening on college campuses. Rob Peter to pay Paul.
The large majority of programs take home a profit, don’t let fudging of the numbers fool you. They only ‘lose’ money after being forced to support other non-revenue producing sports. So ironically, the guys who advocate a free market don’t really want a free market at all. Because in a free market sports who lost millions of dollars every year would not survive and that’s basically what’s happening on college campuses. Rob Peter to pay Paul.
Scholarships aren’t worth 100k over 4 years. But let’s say they are for arguments sake...most players do not stay on scholarship for 4 years because they’re either going pro, processed, etc. Scholarships are year-to-year too which seems to be casually forgotten...in fact that’s what the majority of ‘transfers’ are, coaches telling players their scholarships won’t be renewed and they should look elsewhere. But again let’s assume scholarships are worth 100k over 4 years and all players stay on scholarship that long:
100k x 85= 8.5 million
That’s how much it would cost the program over four years. Now let’s do some more math. Assume it costs $75 a ticket in a 90k stadium (and we know there are seats way more expensive than that plus concessions, apparel, etc.)
$75 x 90k = $6,750,000
So in ONE home game in ONE year a school would make enough to cover all their scholarships for FOUR years using rough math if you include revenue from concessions and apparel also. The cost of those scholarships are more than covered over a four year period by the money generated from games. Assuming a team has 24 home games using our example above the would make 162 million over 4 years. And that’s just looking at ticket sales. Doesn’t include any tv money or anything.
As shown above, your math is wrong, but assuming it's correct, yes, I mean above the scholarship.
According to USA Today, Alabama football made a profit of $46 Million last year. http://sports.usatoday.com/2018/01/27/alabama-football-turned-46m-profit-in-201617/
FYI, the $46 Million profit is AFTER coaches salaries, of course.
The players and the coaches made that $46 Million profit possible. The coaches are getting paid millions, the players are getting a scholarship.
Seems the players are the ones getting the short end of the stick. More could be done for them.
Scholarships aren’t worth 100k over 4 years. But let’s say they are for arguments sake...most players do not stay on scholarship for 4 years because they’re either going pro, processed, etc. Scholarships are year-to-year too which seems to be casually forgotten...in fact that’s what the majority of ‘transfers’ are, coaches telling players their scholarships won’t be renewed and they should look elsewhere. But again let’s assume scholarships are worth 100k over 4 years and all players stay on scholarship that long:
100k x 85= 8.5 million
That’s how much it would cost the program over four years. Now let’s do some more math. Assume it costs $75 a ticket in a 90k stadium (and we know there are seats way more expensive than that plus concessions, apparel, etc.)
$75 x 90k = $6,750,000
So in ONE home game in ONE year a school would make enough to cover all their scholarships for FOUR years using rough math if you include revenue from concessions and apparel also. The cost of those scholarships are more than covered over a four year period by the money generated from games. Assuming a team has 24 home games using our example above the would make 162 million over 4 years. And that’s just looking at ticket sales. Doesn’t include any tv money or anything.
Lol, so there are no expenses to put on a home game?
Most players are not processed or don't make it four years, so you are wrong there. Also no one made the argument that the Universities make more. That is a moot point. The point is they receive a lot of value for a scholarship. A ton of money for books, tuition, nutrition, tutors, stipend, the lifelong value of a degree etc...saying they are getting nothing or even close to nothing is wholly inaccurate.
saying they are getting nothing or even close to nothing is wholly inaccurate.
It's a free market. Those that want to be paid should just skip school all together.
They can all come together and 'freely' form their own football league and finance it themselves, keeping all of their profits for themselves.
If the 'entitled' beggars come to D1 and then the NFL instead, then they go by the contracts that they are offered and signed. Pretty simple really...![]()
And you still have a single digit IQ.
I think I've lost more than that tonight trying to read his posts.
Most players don't get anything.
Lol damn this is the most uninformed post i have ever seen. My brother played college football..... Either your stupid or your dumb....which one is it?
Same one that told you about the aliens?
Of course there are who said there wasn't? It was a rough example. They still make more than triple or more what a scholarship costs them over four years, which was the entire point. And those revenue numbers are underreported if anything.
You did when you said they cover the cost of scholarships in one game.
Are you stupid or are you dumb?
It's not like the schools are writing checks to cover these kids' tuition. That's the (way inflated) value they put on it. They obviously make up for it elsewhere. For every scholarship athlete, they just let in some out of stater and hit them for $30k/per. Again government subsidies. DID YOU HEAR ME FREE MARKETERS!? GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES. Hide the wife and kids!! By the way, tuition costs are driven up by government subsidized loans. MORE GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES!!!! Hell half of you babbling about the free market have probably even complained about government school loan subsidies not even realizing you're using the artificially inflated value of tuition to argue against players getting market value for their skills. You probably didn't even understand that sentence.
It's not like the schools are writing checks to cover these kids' tuition. That's the (way inflated) value they put on it. They obviously make up for it elsewhere. For every scholarship athlete, they just let in some out of stater and hit them for $30k/per. Again government subsidies. DID YOU HEAR ME FREE MARKETERS!? GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES. Hide the wife and kids!! By the way, tuition costs are driven up by government subsidized loans. MORE GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES!!!! Hell half of you babbling about the free market have probably even complained about government school loan subsidies not even realizing you're using the artificially inflated value of tuition to argue against players getting market value for their skills. You probably didn't even understand that sentence.
Again...rough example. Did I really need to spell that out? Change it to four or five games if it makes you feel better..doesn’t take away from the point any. Which is the cost of scholarships is a drop in the bucket compared to the revenue generated by those scholarship players...even at the overinflated cost of a scholarship you used.
You're a moron, you're wrong, and not smart enough to quit when you don't know what you're talking about, so I won't be wasting anymore time on you. Best of luck there Ted Koppel
It's not like the schools are writing checks to cover these kids' tuition. That's the (way inflated) value they put on it. They obviously make up for it elsewhere. For every scholarship athlete, they just let in some out of stater and hit them for $30k/per. Again government subsidies. DID YOU HEAR ME FREE MARKETERS!? GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES. Hide the wife and kids!! By the way, tuition costs are driven up by government subsidized loans. MORE GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES!!!! Hell half of you babbling about the free market have probably even complained about government school loan subsidies not even realizing you're using the artificially inflated value of tuition to argue against players getting market value for their skills. You probably didn't even understand that sentence.
By your deflection I'll assume it is the same brother. Was it just as easy to convince you that most players get paid as it was to convince you about aliens?
Did he hit you with the same "You'd be surprised?" argument?
Just as convincing?
Anybody who read either of our posts would come away thinking I’m a hell of a lot smarter than you. .