It depends on what your argument is. If your argument is comorbidities have nothing to do with the people that die from coronavirus then you’re wrong. They have everything to do with the people to Dave’s run of hours. But if your argument is that insanely stupid one that @GhostOfMatchesMalone keeps trying to make it his obtuse way, that if you had a comorbidity at all then you didn’t have coronavirus, and that’s equally wrong.Do you disagree that the primary stated cause of death on a death certificate is incorrect if it states covid as cause and lists comorbidities? Bunked is the idea that comorbidities negate primary. What is your take on that?
so let’s try and be very clear about this. If you’re a healthy human being under the age of 50 with no comorbidities you are extremely unlikely to die from coronavirus, likely a mortality rate of 0.01% in that group.
If you’re above 50 with no Comorbidities then you’re equally still I’m likely to die from coronavirus but the mortality rates probably closer to 0.4 or 0.5%. Problem is there are very few people in America over the age of 50 they don’t have some comorbidity.
but if you’re over the age of 50 and have several comorbidities that you’re much more likely to die from coronavirus.
so in the end your comorbidities are very important to your risk of dying from coronavirus, which overall is probably below 1% given all takers, and comorbidities are extremely important in the risk of dying, but you’re still dying from coronavirus.
I hope that clarifies it for everybody. Both sides of the argument or wrong.