Why is it so difficult for people to understand that they will rank some teams based on big, marketable match ups that coming weekend.
There is no better rivalry game coach then Meyer. Even Spurs wasn't able to dominate rivalries like this!!Dude is the best big game coach in history. They had every reason to mail it in today, and Urban had them totally ready to kick ass. If Michigan State wins, OSU will win the National Title...take it to the bank.
It's understandable, but it's also bullshit. That wasn't the intent of the rankings. Which is why the human element needs to be removed altogether.[/QUOTE]
Then we are back to something similar as the BCS
I understand your point. But choosing four teams keeps what ever process that is used more palatable.Good. I'd rather a completely unbiased formula that judges everyone the same be used in place of bullshit like eye test, conference afilliation, pretty wins, etc. People forget that we went to the BCS precisely because the human element was screwing over teams. So of course we get the BCS, people bitch, and then we reverse course and go back to the human element on steroids. It's retarded.
Dude is the best big game coach in history. They had every reason to mail it in today, and Urban had them totally ready to kick ass. If Michigan State wins, OSU will win the National Title...take it to the bank.
He said take it to the bank! You'd better cash in on that one.You know that Michigan State will play Iowa in the B10 title game as long as the beat Penn State today, right?
How is Ohio State winning anything?
As one of the four playoff teams....assuming enough teams ahead of OSU lose. MSU-Iowa loser would fall below them most likely. Baylor has already lost. Stanford beats ND and/or OSU beats OU and the Buckeyes are right there.You know that Michigan State will play Iowa in the B10 title game as long as the beat Penn State today, right?
How is Ohio State winning anything?