ADVERTISEMENT

Xidens approval sinking like titanic

More awesome Biden policies. Paying off in spades.



Dude, do you even read your own links?

But speaking at a White House briefing Monday, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas denied a crisis existed on the border.

“The men and women of the Department of Homeland Security are working around the clock, seven days a week to ensure that we do not have a crisis at the border, that we manage the challenge as acute as the challenge is,” he told reporters.
 
Dude, do you even read your own links?

But speaking at a White House briefing Monday, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas denied a crisis existed on the border.

“The men and women of the Department of Homeland Security are working around the clock, seven days a week to ensure that we do not have a crisis at the border, that we manage the challenge as acute as the challenge is,” he told reporters.
well-there-it-is-the-stupidest-goddamn-thing-i-have-heard-all-day.jpg


baghdad-bob.jpg
 
Whew. Crisis denied. That means one doesn’t exist. Thank God. In other news, there must not have been an electrical and water crisis in Texas during the Freeze a couple weeks back. That would explain Biden taking 5 days to respond to it. I mean, if only Bush had waited a few days to respond to Katrina.
 
Whew. Crisis denied. That means one doesn’t exist. Thank God. In other news, there must not have been an electrical and water crisis in Texas during the Freeze a couple weeks back. That would explain Biden taking 5 days to respond to it. I mean, if only Bush had waited a few days to respond to Katrina.
How does one agree on everything the government says when journalists don’t even question the claim?

Gargoyle Jen could hold her daily news conference where she would explain how stupid SoGayNole truly is, he’d be watching of course and would agree. Journalists would write a fluff piece about him and win a Pulitzer.

Then he’d run back to this board to gloat about how gay/stupid he is.

We’d all laugh because he still hasn’t realized the joke is on him.
 
How does one agree on everything the government says when journalists don’t even question the claim?

Gargoyle Jen could hold her daily news conference where she would explain how stupid SoGayNole truly is, he’d be watching of course and would agree. Journalists would write a fluff piece about him and win a Pulitzer.

Then he’d run back to this board to gloat about how gay/stupid he is.

We’d all laugh because he still hasn’t realized the joke is on him.


Homophobia's not cool. You must have some serious "cognitive dissidents".
 
  • Haha
Reactions: EvilWayz
The more important aspect of that article, not that there is a crisis at the border, BUT that 108 ILLEGALS WITH COVID 19 were caught crossing, tested postive for COVID and then RELEASED INTO THE US.
 
More awesome Biden policies. Paying off in spades.

Something I suggested before, since "cornpop" Biden has stopped sending apprehended illegals back to Mexico why doesn't Texas drop them off in New York or California. I would hate to do that to our fellow Americans but on the other hand they are hopelessly Democrat and beyond help.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
Something I suggested before, since "cornpop" Biden has stopped sending apprehended illegals back to Mexico why doesn't Texas drop them off in New York or California. I would hate to do that to our fellow Americans but on the other hand they are hopelessly Democrat and beyond help.
I say drop them off on Pelosi's, Schumur's and Biden's doorstep.
 
Work...for what? Let me ask you this. If jumping Pelosi's fence means you'll guarantee your family a much, much better life, would her fence stop you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
Something I suggested before, since "cornpop" Biden has stopped sending apprehended illegals back to Mexico why doesn't Texas drop them off in New York or California. I would hate to do that to our fellow Americans but on the other hand they are hopelessly Democrat and beyond help.
I approve of this bigly
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
Work...for what? Let me ask you this. If jumping Pelosi's fence means you'll guarantee your family a much, much better life, would her fence stop you?

If I get arrested and then sent back out of her yard then my life won't improve...so, in that scenario, no.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
And you impressed the hell out of your momma.....I think there was video.

200.gif
Well that's odd. These are YOUR peeps. Hope you revel in your vat of shit. So Dull Null's mama is Honey Boo Boo? Seems accurate, and logical to me. 🤣 😂 😁😂

 
If I get arrested and then sent back out of her yard then my life won't improve...so, in that scenario, no.

So it's the getting arrested and sent back part that deters you, not the fence then?

Look, I'm all for stricter border control, I just don't think building a wall is a cost effective measure.
 
So it's the getting arrested and sent back part that deters you, not the fence then?

Look, I'm all for stricter border control, I just don't think building a wall is a cost effective measure.
Well we just let Mexico off the hook for keeping asylum seekers in Mexico until approved, the wall is all we had left and funding for that is gone. What else can we do to keep people out?
 
So it's the getting arrested and sent back part that deters you, not the fence then?

Look, I'm all for stricter border control, I just don't think building a wall is a cost effective measure.
Bull effing shit. What's that thing circling the Capitol now? Walls and fences aren't effective huh? Only when Dimtards do it?

1AERPW8.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: nail1988
Bull effing shit. What's that thing circling the Capitol now? Walls and fences aren't effective huh? Only when Dimtards do it?

1AERPW8.gif

Walls and fences are effective only if there are men guarding them, this is a concept that was well developed even before the bronze age.

I think what might be more effective is a drone surveillance system across the border, identifying trespassers, and a rapid drone response team that can track them and warn them to go back after they cross. The border patrol can then simply be a rapid reaction force to confront those who ignore the warnings.

I'm not entirely opposed to some sort of fence, but there's no need for an expensive, tall, sturdy wall. The fence can do the job that most fences in people's yards do, which is to delineate the boundary rather than deter intruders.

Personally I think this issue is being overly politicized like just about everything else. I think most reasonable people would agree that control of the border is a good thing. I think some sort of barrier over the border is also something that can be reasonably debated. It's too bad that just talking about it evokes so much emotion on both sides that you can't debate the pros and cons without being labeled something derogatory by the opposing side.
 
I think what might be more effective is a drone surveillance system across the border, identifying trespassers, and a rapid drone response team that can track them and warn them to go back after they cross. The border patrol can then simply be a rapid reaction force to confront those who ignore the warnings.

This is also the idea with the fence. It provides time for the QRF to get to where the breech is occurring. Absolutely incorporating drones is a good idea and I'm reasonably certain that we are.
 
Walls and fences are effective only if there are men guarding them, this is a concept that was well developed even before the bronze age.

I think what might be more effective is a drone surveillance system across the border, identifying trespassers, and a rapid drone response team that can track them and warn them to go back after they cross. The border patrol can then simply be a rapid reaction force to confront those who ignore the warnings.

I'm not entirely opposed to some sort of fence, but there's no need for an expensive, tall, sturdy wall. The fence can do the job that most fences in people's yards do, which is to delineate the boundary rather than deter intruders.

Personally I think this issue is being overly politicized like just about everything else. I think most reasonable people would agree that control of the border is a good thing. I think some sort of barrier over the border is also something that can be reasonably debated. It's too bad that just talking about it evokes so much emotion on both sides that you can't debate the pros and cons without being labeled something derogatory by the opposing side.
You are correct, let’s stop bombing other countries, bring everyone home, put our men and women on the boarder, finish the wall, problem solved.

Just so I understand you clearly, you want to give people warnings for breaking federal law coming into the country?

We need a barrier period. Build the wall as tall as it goes, electrify the fence, I don’t care. The influx of illegals needs to stop. This just isn’t about illegals, there is drug smuggling and human trafficking issues that fail to be addressed.

Now, if you want to make it easier to become a US citizen, granted you’re not a criminal and can contribute immediately, then by all means let’s talk. But if we keep playing ole at the boarder, this doesn’t end well.
 
You are correct, let’s stop bombing other countries, bring everyone home, put our men and women on the boarder, finish the wall, problem solved.

Just so I understand you clearly, you want to give people warnings for breaking federal law coming into the country?

We need a barrier period. Build the wall as tall as it goes, electrify the fence, I don’t care. The influx of illegals needs to stop. This just isn’t about illegals, there is drug smuggling and human trafficking issues that fail to be addressed.

Now, if you want to make it easier to become a US citizen, granted you’re not a criminal and can contribute immediately, then by all means let’s talk. But if we keep playing ole at the boarder, this doesn’t end well.

Like I said before, I'm not entirely against a wall. I also agree that it's not just about illegal immigration either. I'd like to see more debate about what type of wall, what more can be done (again, just a wall in itself in addition to what we have now is insufficient and a waste of money IMO) to make it effective.

As for the warning part, it's unrealistic to confront every one who trespasses to 1) confirm they're in fact trespassers, and 2) compel them to leave or arrest them. A warning I think is reasonable if it can deter some from continuing their journey.
 
Like I said before, I'm not entirely against a wall. I also agree that it's not just about illegal immigration either. I'd like to see more debate about what type of wall, what more can be done (again, just a wall in itself in addition to what we have now is insufficient and a waste of money IMO) to make it effective.

As for the warning part, it's unrealistic to confront every one who trespasses to 1) confirm they're in fact trespassers, and 2) compel them to leave or arrest them. A warning I think is reasonable if it can deter some from continuing their journey.
Don’t you find it awfully strange that illegal immigrant migration was lowered after the wall was being built and finished?

I’m not saying a wall is perfect but it does deter people from entering.

Another reason it dropped was because Trump negotiated with Mexico to keep migrants in their country while these people sought out asylum. That has now been removed by sleepy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatordad3
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT