Georgia 6th in the SEC.
Yeah, like that 3 star Jim Thorpe Award winner. The best center in the league last year was a DL recruit of Richt. The 2 star safety that graded out as the best safety in the SEC in 2018. The 2018 freshman all American DL that wasn't a top 250 rated player. Eric Stokes also says hello.Georgia just recruits good. They don’t really develop much once they get there. That has been a historical problem at UGA through the Goff, Donnan, Richt and now Smart years
Yeah, like that 3 star Jim Thorpe Award winner. The best center in the league last year was a DL recruit of Richt. The 2 star safety that graded out as the best safety in the SEC in 2018. The 2018 freshman all American DL that wasn't a top 250 rated player. Eric Stokes also says hello.
Yap yap yap Insta... but you say nothing.One post it's all about their 4-5 star recruits that are the best in the SEC.
Then the next post it's about 2-3 stars that are playing ahead of the 4-5 stars.
Snakes and UGly leghumpers both have forked tongues, to facilitate yappin' out of both sides of their mouth...![]()
Yap yap yap Insta... but you say nothing.
Fyi, 2 of those were Richt recruits that Smart developed. You can throw Butkus Award winner Roquan Smith to that list.
Its an impossible thing to measure. Obviously amny teams could take many stats to prove their case.
I guess the saying that "No one gets less done with more than Texas" isn't just a saying.
Considering Dan Mullen is the greatest developer of talent in college football, I seem to be having trouble finding Mississippi State on your list. How is that possible?
It's that "Lies, damn lies, and statistics!" problem that always haunts analysis. Linking numbers and causation is fraught with fallacies.
These statistics provided from "247" probably cover the last 12 years in order to have any hope at achieving validity. If so you are looking at Mark Richt's tenure at GEORGIA. If it covers two years with Smart's recruits then you have primarily Richt's recruits put into a system they were not recruited to play in. More significantly, conclusions predicated on 2 or 3 years of statistics carry essentially no validity.
In short, the thesis presented touting FLORIDA's perceived " excellence" is inherently flawed in terms of offering any "order of probability" projecting the future of football recruits, but the statistics and subsequent thesis are beneficial as a psychological remedy for fans in hopes of reducing cognitive dissonance.
When trying to sound smart goes wrong. This reads like someone who looked up a bunch of words they don’t understand while putting together a word salad of a post. Good job.