What is your view of ensuring election integrity?

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Where are you when it comes to securing election integrity

 

[RayGravesGhost]

Where are you?

If you had supported the Voting Rights Act any changes related to COVID would have to had passed DOJ review

I guess republican voter supression was more important than election integrity

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

ray ray the only thing I can see from you in this thread would be a vote.

And I see you are again too skeered to go on the record LOL

 

[RayGravesGhost]

I don't vote in dumb polls....and we all can see your polls are dumb 🤣

 

[grandhavendiddy]

I don't vote in dumb polls....and we all can see your polls are dumb 🤣

Very good poll. I am the one vote in the middle. I think Ghost can add a new #2 and #4:

#2 = I believe strongly that elections were stolen, but have not seen the broad evidence come together. I also believe that the MSM and Big Tech has sided nearly exclusively with Democrats to support non-R and anti-Trump positions. (e.g. the "walls are closing in"....)

#4 = Elections on both sides, have raised questions and be it the left in 2016, Stacy Abrams in 2018, or other, but in general, yes, there are some anomalies and illegal behavior, but not enough, on either side, to say that elections have been stolen. Both the left and the right should pay an eye on it, but not make it a main focus of programming.

 

[DCandtheUTBand]

In states where pubs have the legislature they need to roll back absentee voting to pre covid rules...in other states they need to do early voting and harvesting

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Very good poll. I am the one vote in the middle. I think Ghost can add a new #2 and #4:

#2 = I believe strongly that elections were stolen, but have not seen the broad evidence come together. I also believe that the MSM and Big Tech has sided nearly exclusively with Democrats to support non-R and anti-Trump positions. (e.g. the "walls are closing in"....)

#4 = Elections on both sides, have raised questions and be it the left in 2016, Stacy Abrams in 2018, or other, but in general, yes, there are some anomalies and illegal behavior, but not enough, on either side, to say that elections have been stolen. Both the left and the right should pay an eye on it, but not make it a main focus of programming.

As you NASCAR fans know, when a race is won, the winning car is immediately impounded and taken apart to verify that all the parts are within spec. If it's discovered that a team used parts that were out of spec, the winner can be forced to forfeit and the team fined or even suspended.

I think of that as being similar to what should happen with the machines used for elections. Immediately after the election is decided, the machines in all 50 states should be audited to ensure there was no cheating.

I also think all 50 states should be bound by the same deadlines. This is a big way the dems introduce cheating. Hey we need a few more days to 'find' all the ballots....er.....COUNT all the ballots. But if you have a quick deadline, say within 24 hours of the end of the in-person voting period all votes are final, then that greatly hampers the dems' ability to cheat by manufacturing votes. Doesn't eliminate it, but does make it harder.

Anyone who wants secure and fair elections should support tighter auditing of the process.

Anyone that wants to see their side cheat, will be against it.

BTW your 4th option, both sides have complaints, should be addressed by stronger auditing.

 

[GatorTheo]

Of course there should be election integrity. Only the cheating democrats disagree.

Unfortunately, insuring it is probably unconstitutional.

 

[NavigatorII]

ray ray the only thing I can see from you in this thread would be a vote.

And I see you are again too skeered to go on the record LOL

Why do I get the mental picture of Gay Ray being James Earl Jones on meth? 😂

 

[RayGravesGhost]

As you NASCAR fans know, when a race is won, the winning car is immediately impounded and taken apart to verify that all the parts are within spec. If it's discovered that a team used parts that were out of spec, the winner can be forced to forfeit and the team fined or even suspended.

I think of that as being similar to what should happen with the machines used for elections. Immediately after the election is decided, the machines in all 50 states should be audited to ensure there was no cheating.

I also think all 50 states should be bound by the same deadlines. This is a big way the dems introduce cheating. Hey we need a few more days to 'find' all the ballots....er.....COUNT all the ballots. But if you have a quick deadline, say within 24 hours of the end of the in-person voting period all votes are final, then that greatly hampers the dems' ability to cheat by manufacturing votes. Doesn't eliminate it, but does make it harder.

Anyone who wants secure and fair elections should support tighter auditing of the process.

Anyone that wants to see their side cheat, will be against it.

BTW your 4th option, both sides have complaints, should be addressed by stronger auditing.

Then where was your support of the Voting Rights Act...your white supremacist partisanship comes shinin' thru as usual....no surprise 😲


Let's take a look at some of the stupid being attempted in Arizona in the name of GOP election "integrity"


https://www.yahoo.com/news/arizona-bills-post-voters-names-120038605.html
Arizona bills would post voters' names, addresses, birth years and ballot images
Alex Gulotta and Jenny Guzman
March 17, 2023·4 min read


The right to privately and securely cast a ballot, a pillar of voting rights, has stood the test of time as Arizona’s democracy has faced increasing attacks in recent years. The Arizona Constitution affirms “secrecy in voting shall be preserved,” but Senate Bill 1324 and House Bill 2560 put this at risk.

The companion bills, dubbed the “Voter Privacy Violation Act” by civil rights advocates, would make Arizona an extreme outlier by posting detailed voter data and unfiltered ballot images online during the critical post-election leading up to certification of the results.

In actuality, the act creates a threatening voting environment by posting voters’ names, addresses, birth years and all ballot images online.

It then connects that information to voters’ specific precincts before certification, when it could be used to identify individual voters and to manufacture election falsehoods.

 

[tb8232]

Democrats always reserve the right to cheat. Have to close the mechanisms they use. Vote harvesting, mail in cheating without an identifying code on the ballot. Have to get back to paper ballots inserted into a machine with the voter present unless the voter specifically requests an absentee ballot which must have an identifying code unique to that voter.

 

[RayGravesGhost]

Isn't funny how when black voters wait in line republicans want to outlaw giving them water and reduce voting locations?

But white voters in Arizona get an automatic turnover of the election itself


If this was the rule in Georgia...they would NEVER have a completed election


https://www.yahoo.com/news/senate-republicans-hatch-scheme-overturn-192956414.html
Senate Republicans hatch a new scheme to overturn Arizona's elections
Laurie Roberts, Arizona Republic
Fri, March 24, 2023 at 5:07 PM EDT·3 min read

Just when you think it’s safe to assume that our leaders have exhausted the many creative ways in which they hope to overturn the results of future elections they don’t like, they come up with a new scheme to undermine democracy.

To wit: An automatic do-over of any election in which 1,000 voters in Maricopa County (or 250 in any other county) had to wait in line for more than 90 minutes.

Doesn’t matter if those voters actually got to vote. If enough of them had to wait at least 90 minutes, they can order up a new election.


Sure, what could go wrong?

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Democrats always reserve the right to cheat. Have to close the mechanisms they use. Vote harvesting, mail in cheating without an identifying code on the ballot. Have to get back to paper ballots inserted into a machine with the voter present unless the voter specifically requests an absentee ballot which must have an identifying code unique to that voter.

And that proves that dems are unAmerican. Only cheaters support cheating.

Want to infuriate a dem? Post that we need to ensure election integrity. I have NEVER seen a dem on this board agree with that statement. Instead, it infuriates them like no other.

That tells you all you need to know.

 

[RayGravesGhost]

conservatives believe that re-voting over and over again is "integrity"...

To them "integrity" is voting until we win and then stop

 

[Capt Ron 1]

DEMORATS believe that re-voting over and over again is "integrity"...

To them "integrity" is voting until we win and then stop

You got this right