What a coincidence, $5000 a dose hoax flu treatment already in the hands of doctors

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Yet...



Reminder, Fauci's NIH reviewed and supplied the 'data' that was the main component of the push for $5000 a dose drug. Fauci also said $1 a dose HCQ wouldn't help with coronavirus, after saying it WOULD in 2005.

Also, $5000 a dose drug was brought to the market years ago to treat Hepatitis C. And was found to be ineffective in doing so.

Follow the money. Sheep will line up to take $5000 a dose drug and risk kidney and liver failure, and will refuse $1 a dose drug that has been proven to cure hoax flu with the main side affect being nausea.

 

[Nolec]

View embedded media

Yet...

View embedded media

Reminder, Fauci's NIH reviewed and supplied the 'data' that was the main component of the push for $5000 a dose drug. Fauci also said $1 a dose HCQ wouldn't help with coronavirus, after saying it WOULD in 2005.

Also, $5000 a dose drug was brought to the market years ago to treat Hepatitis C. And was found to be ineffective in doing so.

Follow the money. Sheep will line up to take $5000 a dose drug and risk kidney and liver failure, and will refuse $1 a dose drug that has been proven to cure hoax flu with the main side affect being nausea.

Perhaps consider that Zelenko's observational HCQ study was of non-hospitalized patients that were asymptomatic , the Detroit HCQ study was hand-selected patients with no complications, and you want to compare a study of 5 patients that BEGAN treatment in ICU. Sure.

 

[GADAWGinIraq]

Perhaps consider that Zelenko's observational HCQ study was of non-hospitalized patients that were asymptomatic , the Detroit HCQ study was hand-selected patients with no complications, and you want to compare a study of 5 patients that BEGAN treatment in ICU. Sure.

What about the BS anti HCQ info by the faux research company that the MSM ate up and ran with? The "problem" with HCQ is that big pharma can't make money on it.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Perhaps consider that Zelenko's observational HCQ study was of non-hospitalized patients that were asymptomatic , the Detroit HCQ study was hand-selected patients with no complications, and you want to compare a study of 5 patients that BEGAN treatment in ICU. Sure.

Good lord...why you continue to comment on links you haven't read, I will never understand.

Please read the actual study - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971220305282

The study involved 5 patients who were in ICU. All 5 were given Fauci's Miracle $5000 drug.

FOUR of the patients developed new health problems AFTER BEING GIVEN THE DRUG. Two of them died, the other two recovered from the HEALTH PROBLEMS CREATED BY THE DRUG, and were eventually discharged.

The fifth patient (Case #4) did not develop new health issues after taking the drug, but also didn't show particular improvement from taking it either. He recovered in spite of the drug.


BTW did anyone notice that @Nolec didn't like the idea of this study including ICU patients, but he LOVES touting the highly flawed obervational VA 'study' that involved HCQ being given to patients who were about to die, then when they did, HCQ was blamed. In this French study, 0% of the patients recovered from hoax flu due to Fauci's Miracle $5000 drug. 40% died as a direct result of taking it, and another 40% developing new, life-threatening health conditions. They thankfully survived AFTER treatment of Fauci's Miracle $5000 Drug was discontinued.

Sheep live to be hoodwinked. Amazing thing to see in real-time, isn't it?

 

[Nolec]

What about the BS anti HCQ info by the faux research company that the MSM ate up and ran with? The "problem" with HCQ is that big pharma can't make money on it.

Link?

 

[Nolec]

Good lord...why you continue to comment on links you haven't read, I will never understand.

Please read the actual study - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971220305282

The study involved 5 patients who were in ICU. All 5 were given Fauci's Miracle $5000 drug.

FOUR of the patients developed new health problems AFTER BEING GIVEN THE DRUG. Two of them died, the other two recovered from the HEALTH PROBLEMS CREATED BY THE DRUG, and were eventually discharged.

The fifth patient (Case #4) did not develop new health issues after taking the drug, but also didn't show particular improvement from taking it either. He recovered in spite of the drug.


BTW did anyone notice that @Nolec didn't like the idea of this study including ICU patients, but he LOVES touting the highly flawed obervational VA 'study' that involved HCQ being given to patients who were about to die, then when they did, HCQ was blamed. In this French study, 0% of the patients recovered from hoax flu due to Fauci's Miracle $5000 drug. 40% died as a direct result of taking it, and another 40% developing new, life-threatening health conditions. They thankfully survived AFTER treatment of Fauci's Miracle $5000 Drug was discontinued.

Sheep live to be hoodwinked. Amazing thing to see in real-time, isn't it?

Your reading comprehension is so poor. You claim I didn't read the link but I posted the facts FROM the link, that you then restated. That's redundant.

You cannot provide any post where I "touted" the VA study. Never happened. Are your delusional regarding HCQ or something, that you make up stuff? How is it you rail at the Va study with HCQ being given to ICU patients as so unfair, BUT the French 5 person study you claim makes Remsedivir so horrible..... was given to... wait for it.....ICU patients. Are you day drinking?

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Your reading comprehension is so poor. You claim I didn't read the link but I posted the facts FROM the link, that you then restated. That's redundant.

All you mentioned was that the patients were in the ICU. What you left out was that 80% of the ICU patients developed NEW HEALTH PROBLEMS AFTER BEING GIVEN THE DRUG. I suspect you didn't mention that part because you didn't know that part.

The 5 patients being in the ICU wasn't the relevant point. 80% of the patients developing NEW HEALTH PROBLEMS AFTER TAKING THE DRUG is the key point.

Please don't take this drug if you get hoax flu. It's not safe.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

You cannot provide any post where I "touted" the VA study. Never happened. Are your delusional regarding HCQ or something, that you make up stuff? How is it you rail at the Va study with HCQ being given to ICU patients as so unfair, BUT the French 5 person study you claim makes Remsedivir so horrible..... was given to... wait for it.....ICU patients. Are you day drinking?

Because the patients in the VA study were going to die anyway. That was specifically why they were given HCQ, so the study could claim the result it wanted.

With the French study, 80% of the patients developed NEW HEALTH PROBLEMS from taking the drug, and of those patients, 50% of them DIED DUE TO COMPLICATIONS FROM THOSE HEALTH PROBLEMS.

Any fool can see the difference in the validity of the studies. Please do not take Fauci's Miracle $5000 Drug, it is not safe.

PS: Many patients also report horrible skin rashes and discolorations after taking the drug as well. I'll go with $1 HCQ, which is proven both safe AND effective. Fauci's Miracle $5000 Drug is neither.

 

[Nolec]

All you mentioned was that the patients were in the ICU. What you left out was that 80% of the ICU patients developed NEW HEALTH PROBLEMS AFTER BEING GIVEN THE DRUG. I suspect you didn't mention that part because you didn't know that part.

The 5 patients being in the ICU wasn't the relevant point. 80% of the patients developing NEW HEALTH PROBLEMS AFTER TAKING THE DRUG is the key point.

Please don't take this drug if you get hoax flu. It's not safe.

Are you suffering short term memory issues? You posted the 80% item way, way, back oh 3 posts and less than 3 hrs ago.... why would I wish to retype what is plainly there? % patients is an extremely relevant and important point.... if one knows any science.
We notice you failed to back up your false claim that I touted the VA study. I'll keep waiting.
Sue everyone should refuse to take a drug the doctors, CDC, WHO, and FDA says to take and tahe the one they specifically state is not to be taken. Because Ghost has a conspiracy theory that the whole world would rather die, than let Trump be correct. ROTFLMAO

 

[instaGATOR]

Open EVERYTHING back up and under the 'Right to Try' use what has already been proven to work.

Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin + Zinc (HCQ+AZ+Zinc)

Unlike the conventional method of admitting patients to the hospitals, Dr. Zelenko’s approach is to provide treatment to patients before their situation get worse so they don’t have to be admitted into the hospital. His approach has been so effective to the point that he has treated 900 coronavirus patients with 99.99% rate. His approach is to provide treatment to people so that they don’t have to be put on ventilators. His out-patient treatment regimen, which costs only $12, is as follows:

1. Hydroxychloroquine 200mg twice a day for 5 days

2. Azithromycin 500mg once a day for 5 days

3. Zinc sulfate 220mg once a day for 5 days

These three drugs are well known and usually well tolerated, hence the risk to the patient is low.”

https://techstartups.com/2020/04/05...oronavirus-patients-treated-must-watch-video/

==========

Hydrogen Peroxide nebulizer to treat Co-V-19 and ALL OTHER VIRUS INFECTIONS.
This is also an out-patient (at home) treatment with around a $200 dollar cost.

http://www.drwlc.com/blog/2020/03/21/hydrogen-peroxide-nebulizer-to-treat-covid-19-infection/

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Are you suffering short term memory issues? You posted the 80% item way, way, back oh 3 posts and less than 3 hrs ago.... why would I wish to retype what is plainly there? % patients is an extremely relevant and important point.... if one knows any science.
We notice you failed to back up your false claim that I touted the VA study. I'll keep waiting.
Sue everyone should refuse to take a drug the doctors, CDC, WHO, and FDA says to take and tahe the one they specifically state is not to be taken. Because Ghost has a conspiracy theory that the whole world would rather die, than let Trump be correct. ROTFLMAO

You mean why would you want to address points that prove you had no idea what the study's key takeaway was?

I think the answer is obvious to all.

And calm down, you're typing too fast and leaving out half the letters. Take your time, you can still be wrong, it will ust take a couple more minutes for me to correct your misinformation, is all.

 

[Nolec]

You mean why would you want to address points that prove you had no idea what the study's key takeaway was?

I think the answer is obvious to all.

And calm down, you're typing too fast and leaving out half the letters. Take your time, you can still be wrong, it will ust take a couple more minutes for me to correct your misinformation, is all.

Losing badly so you want to play grammar police? OK was is "ust" Hilarious... best get your stuff in order before you call someone out on it. LOL Sure a 5 person , non-scientific study in France is perfect proof of a world-wide drug conspiracy to unseat Trump at the cost of thousands of lives. Dude, you are in a fantasy world. Funny but really sad as well.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Losing badly so you want to play grammar police? OK was is "ust" Hilarious... best get your stuff in order before you call someone out on it. LOL Sure a 5 person , non-scientific study in France is perfect proof of a world-wide drug conspiracy to unseat Trump at the cost of thousands of lives. Dude, you are in a fantasy world. Funny but really sad as well.

Actually it's proof that this one study found the following:

0% of the patients found that Fauci's Miracle $5000 Drug improved their covid symptoms
40% of the patients developed new health problems after taking the drug, and later died from complications associated with those conditions
40% of the patients developed new health problems after taking the drug, and the conditions cleared after use of the drug was discontinued and they survived.

To a critical thinker, that suggests that we definitely need to do more robust studies on Fauci's Miracle $5000 Drug before we approve it as perfectly safe to treat a virus.

 

[Nolec]

Actually it's proof that this one study found the following:

0% of the patients found that Fauci's Miracle $5000 Drug improved their covid symptoms
40% of the patients developed new health problems after taking the drug, and later died from complications associated with those conditions
40% of the patients developed new health problems after taking the drug, and the conditions cleared after use of the drug was discontinued and they survived.

To a critical thinker, that suggests that we definitely need to do more robust studies on Fauci's Miracle $5000 Drug before we approve it as perfectly safe to treat a virus.

Agree 100%. We need reliable, definitive studies to get us a treatment/cure, since there's no vaccine at this time and no guarantee of one soon.

 

[instaGATOR]

Cures exist for the conservatives.

No cures exist for the progressive socialist Dim-Moe-Rats.

Nirvana has arrived....

(a transcendent state in which there is neither suffering, desire, nor sense of self, and the subject is released from the effects of karma and the cycle of death and rebirth)

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Agree 100%. We need reliable, definitive studies to get us a treatment/cure, since there's no vaccine at this time and no guarantee of one soon.

Now back to the OP: Arizona's governor proudly announcing the state bringing in 361 cases of Fauci's $5000 Miracle Drug.

Smart move?

 

[instaGATOR]

Now back to the OP: Arizona's governor proudly announcing the state bringing in 361 cases of Fauci's $5000 Miracle Drug.

Smart move?

Missing information:
What's his cut on the profits before I give my answer on the move.

 

[GADAWGinIraq]

Link?

Surgisphere... check them out.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...ntists-are-heart-surgisphere-covid-19-scandal

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...-world-health-organization-hydroxychloroquine

 

[gatordad3]

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

View embedded media

Media and dems trying to bury $1 a dose HCQ despite very promising early trials, while $5000 a dose Fauci's Miracle Drug is already in the hands of medical professionals, ready to give to patients, despite little to no positive studies, and early results showing death from taking it is QUITE possible.

ie, the very thing they falsely claimed about taking HCQ. More than anything, the media and Fauci's approach to HCQ vs $5000 a dose drug give away the left's game. This is about leveraging a 'worldwide health crisis' as a moneymaker for big pharma and the dems.

 

[instaGATOR]

Media and dems trying to bury $1 a dose HCQ despite very promising early trials, while $5000 a dose Fauci's Miracle Drug is already in the hands of medical professionals, ready to give to patients, despite little to no positive studies, and early results showing death from taking it is QUITE possible.

ie, the very thing they falsely claimed about taking HCQ. More than anything, the media and Fauci's approach to HCQ vs $5000 a dose drug give away the left's game. This is about leveraging a 'worldwide health crisis' as a moneymaker for big pharma and the dems.

If you had read this book, you'd have known decades ago....
BTW, I won't be taking any Co-V vaccine, even if they are giving it away for free.

Book -- "Muder By Injection" --- Eustace Mullins