Wait...what is this?
- Thread starter GhostOfMatchesMalone
- Start date
He has been telling the same story. Which is why it’s curious to me that Tucker would put his credibility with the middle at stake to rehash this guy’s story.
Tucker’s credibility is the most important element here. He was gaining quite a bit with his opposition to the Ukraine war and getting fired by Fox. He was really gaining traction with People in the middle (I include myself), and bringing some important issues into discussion.
If this interview is just this guy telling this same story, he’s going to lose credibility with everyone except the Rs/Trumpers, which is fine except he’s preaching to the choir with that group.
I don't understand how giving a wider audience to a guy with this kind of experience with such a high profile figure is going to ruin anyone's credibility?
It's a big story whether you think it's important or not. A future President freebasing is sort of crazy.
That man really said being with obama left a bad taste in his mouth.
Just going to leave this here for you. This is what the media and the elites hope you do, so congrats I guess.Is this the guy? Why would Tucker put his credibility on the line to let this guy tell a 10-year-old story? They must have something corroborating. If not, it was a huge misstep by Carlson.
Obama accuser has long rap sheet
Sinclair's biography may get in the way of his attempts to lend his story legitimacy.www.politico.com
I'm not an Obama fan. He's responsible for a lot of the ugliness in American society today. He has earned that rep.
However, questioning Sinclair's character seems reasonable as well based on his actions. Maybe he is telling the truth here but it's not unreasonable to look at his history. The only thing that any of us ever truly earn is our reputation.
And let's be honest, no one on this board would trust anything that this man says if it wasn't something that we wanted to believe. It very well may be true but I'm unlikely to believe it just because a liar says it is so.
However, questioning Sinclair's character seems reasonable as well based on his actions. Maybe he is telling the truth here but it's not unreasonable to look at his history. The only thing that any of us ever truly earn is our reputation.
And let's be honest, no one on this board would trust anything that this man says if it wasn't something that we wanted to believe. It very well may be true but I'm unlikely to believe it just because a liar says it is so.
I agree. We should question everything in life. That’s healthy. And I am Not saying you’re wrong, but when someone tells you who they are, believe them.
From Barrys own memoir.
“used a little blow" and wrote to his girlfriend, "I make love to men daily, but in the imagination."
Sure we should question people, but we should also listen to people. I bet there isn’t a person on the planet that hasn’t lied at some point in their life.
As for Tuckers reputation from above. It’s basically him being a reporter. Doing his job.
“I report, you decide”
To me, that’s how it should work. Do the reporting, and let people decide who is telling the truth. Not sure what that has to do with his reputation.
Last edited:
I want him to say Obama likes ghey blowjobs and freebasing cocaine with randos?
I actually don't want any President or Former President to be anything but Presidential. Obama's racial division and socialist ideologies are plenty for me to dislike...
But when stuff like this comes out you have ask some questions:
1) What does Larry gain from all of this? He's not getting rich. If he's getting famous it's for being a cokehead ghey boy toy. Is that something people aspire to be? He didn't know who's peen he was blowing, it was just a random black dude who could get coke and wanted to mess around.
2) His story hasn't changed in 15 years. Usually liars can't keep it straight that long.
3) The shoe does seem to fit, what with the letters to the GF that just came out, the "Michael" slip ups, the bulges in Michelle's pants, etc.
4) Several people have vouched for him and his story publicly.
5) Has anyone on the Obama side denied any of this? Have they even addressed it?
I don't know, I'm seeing more reason to think the story checks out than it doesn't. And at the end of the day it really doesn't matter to me, I already have made up my mind about Obama and couldn't care less if he likes dudes.
Why would you trust obama over this guy?
I don't trust either of them. Let's investigate and get to the bottom of it.
I said on many occasions The Doctor Of Common Sense has been demonetized on YouTube for his Manchelle exposures but YouTube won't give him an explanation as to why.
I don't have a problem with Tucker's interview. I just take Sinclair's comments at face value.
And his reputation carries weight on whether or not I believe what he says. Of course his reputation matters.
I wouldn't. I wouldn't trust either of them either. For me Sinclair has a story and it's fine by me if he tells it. But I wouldn't believe him if he told me it was raining outside unless I checked for myself. That's all I'm saying.
Yes, I think most of us would be likely to believe negative stuff about Obama, because we don't like him and because we believe that he is a literal enemy of the US, especially if the source was reasonably trustworthy.
I'll take it into account and give it the appropriate weight along with other evidence that has or will come out. But Sinclair is not a trustworthy source. He has spent most of his life perfecting that.
Depends on the subject matter.
When it comes to ghey blowies and coke I think he's pretty experienced 😆
That’s fine. But reputation should be based on whether Tucker lies, not on if he interviews someone who allegedly lied in the past.
If the standard is don’t interview someone who lied at some point, then there would be no interviews with anyone, ever.
It’s an ignorant determining factor for credibility.
This was a decent sized story that @kjfreeze shared that we somehow overlooked: A former college classmate of obama's believes that obama attended college in Columbia's 'sister school' in Moscow. And he claims that's where obama learned how to be a good communist.
I'm not for certain, but I believe Root is the person that broke the news of Hunter's laptop.
Again, not busting Tuckers balls for interviewing. I have no issue with him doing the interview or giving the perspective.
But again, I don't just accept a liars word and Sinclair is a liar. That isn't a reflection on Tucker. It's a reflection of Sinclair's entire life as an adult as far as I can tell. But the interview was still very interesting.
And it's disingenuous to compare Sinclair, a guy with a very shady history, to the rest of us sinners who have all made mistakes. Sinclair isn't a guy who has told a lie. He is a guy who has lived his entire life without integrity. It's entirely possible that he's telling the truth here, maybe it's even probable...but as a source he sucks. That's undeniable.
Yeah basically my point is the “story” was beneath Tucker. It was 15 years old to begin with. If it was some new angle or new corroboration or whatever I could see it. BecUse I think tucker’s ultimate point is “everybody knew this but the media didn’t report on it.” Which is a good angle. But you’ve got to come with more than just this guy rehashing the same story.
But it is interesting that this comes out as part of a series of negative Obama stories, as Ghost has pointed out. Guy goes from completely bulletproof to like 6 weeks straight of successive weird ass stories breaking, and a few of them were old and previously reported (this guy and the biographer stuff including the fact that Obama has daily gay fantasies).
And interesting the timing with Biden just falling apart and I think Dems coming to the realization they probably can’t run this guy again. You see how they are trying to prop up Kamala now, with her going overseas and saying she’s “ready to step in.” So I wonder if the whole slant is a warning to Michelle to stay out of the race.
But it is interesting that this comes out as part of a series of negative Obama stories, as Ghost has pointed out. Guy goes from completely bulletproof to like 6 weeks straight of successive weird ass stories breaking, and a few of them were old and previously reported (this guy and the biographer stuff including the fact that Obama has daily gay fantasies).
And interesting the timing with Biden just falling apart and I think Dems coming to the realization they probably can’t run this guy again. You see how they are trying to prop up Kamala now, with her going overseas and saying she’s “ready to step in.” So I wonder if the whole slant is a warning to Michelle to stay out of the race.
My personal take has always been that the obamas want nothing to do with the White House. I think they are happy to stay behind the curtain and pull strings, or help others do so.
But back to Tucker, a few weeks ago he was interviewing someone and I think he was talking about how the media doesn't cover the left or something, and he said something like 'Look at obama, the media never covered him, and he did some pretty bad stuff!' And that comment was just like out of left field cause they weren't talking about obama.
I think someone got in Tucker's ear and told him there's some bad stuff about to come out on obama, you might want to get involved in this now. And I wouldn't be shocked if it was Trump feeding him info.
Only thing I would say is….
Barry has been a liar his entire life as well, so which liar do we believe here?
And I know you didn’t say this, but folks don’t judge people interviewing Barry. They don’t question the reputation of the person interviewing him. Just an interesting societal observation.
Always found it interesting how we get appalled or ok with behavior based on an assigned status by the media/society.
I believe it’s because everyone knows it’s Obamas 3rd term. Going after Joes crimes are all well and good, but you got to get to the kingpin. This is just part of that process.
I get that. But then you have to sit back and evaluate the story. The story is VERY plausible from Husseins own admissions of doing cocaine, and desiring man sex.
But lets not lose sight of the REAL problem with Hussein...his overwhelming desire to protect muslim terrorists. Does everyone remember the terror attacks that happened while he was president? Notice they stopped right after Trump was elected? I did.
This plus, he's putting himself in serious danger by giving this interview. I mean hells bells, obama's chef was just killed.
This isn't like someone making a claim like this about Trump, they will be an instant millionaire. Someone makes a claim like this about obama, they immediately have to go into witness protection.
That makes his story more believable IMO.
And it won't stop with obama. But gotta go up the ladder one rung at a time.
What a fantastic day it will be when Barry rolls over. Like the best gender reveal in history.
Multiplied by a thousand.
I was very pleased to see obama is being targeted, it shows we are moving to the next stage of disclosure.
I very rarely post rumors here. Mainly because most of the stuff I've heard cannot be verified, and it sounds so fantastic that the left will immediately dismiss. I will sometimes make VERY vague references to certain rumors only to use as a 'I was right' reminder later when it comes out as truth. Like @gator1776, my ego is fragile.
I'll say this: If we are going up the ladder, I think there are likely 3-4 more rungs above obama. I don't think soros is at the top either.
I agree he isn’t at the top. He is closer but not the guy/families at the top.
