ADVERTISEMENT

Trump going to Prison!

He's a pretty straight-shooter.
Well then he knows who the whistleblower is, which is the most important question in the country right now.

If a credible witness has firsthand knowledge Biden took a $5MM bribe in exchange for policy decisions…it has to be game over, right?

President Kamala is on her way?
 
It's amazing to me how some people can still pretend that our DOJ isn't politicized. In some cases they're willing to participate in making crap up from whole cloth. In other cases...well, this.

If you cannot discern the difference, you're an idiot. If you can discern the difference but pretend like there isn't one, you're a liar.
 
CNN reporter.

This is how sheep stay hoodwinked. You don't understand what a whistleblower is.

A whistleblower makes claims. Those claims then lead to an investigation where EVIDENCE is collected.

The statement itself isn't evidence. So claiming that 'while the document contains allegations made by the unnamed whistleblower, it doesn't provide proof they are true' is itself misinformation designed to hoodwink CNN viewers, AKA democrats.

What would happen if a whistleblower came forward about Trump? All they would have to do is MAKE THE CLAIM, and it would be THE story on air 24/7.

But they would have no EVIDENCE of their claims either.

Yet when a whistleblower comes out against a dem, the lefty media goes into propaganda mode.

It's how half this country believes in a world that literally does not exist.
 
Perhaps they're done with dopey and are ready to move on to dingy. Let's see if this goes so far as all those promised impeachments that got Green a lot of publicity and nothing else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Capt Ron 1
Title is misleading

It is well passed time for joey to be put in prison

however, the Pubs have no balls and will let him slide
 
  • Like
Reactions: kjfreeze
Title is misleading

It is well passed time for joey to be put in prison

however, the Pubs have no balls and will let him slide
Many of the pubs are in on the same schemes.

One of the most salient things Q ever posted was that the people on BOTH sides of the isle that are the most compromised are elevated to the highest positions of government, so that their past deeds can be used to control them.

Also explains why BOTH sides so violently opposed Trump being inserted as President. If you have a mob structure and the guy on the top cannot be leveraged by the rest of the crime network, that's a massive problem.
 
Title is misleading

It is well passed time for joey to be put in prison

however, the Pubs have no balls and will let him slide
They haven't had balls in the past but things are different now (some of them). The issue is that Congress doesn't have prosecutorial enforcement powers. They can be good cops and have the whole issue dismissed by the DOJ. :mad:
 
  • Like
Reactions: jhgator
Many of the pubs are in on the same schemes.

One of the most salient things Q ever posted was that the people on BOTH sides of the isle that are the most compromised are elevated to the highest positions of government, so that their past deeds can be used to control them.

Also explains why BOTH sides so violently opposed Trump being inserted as President. If you have a mob structure and the guy on the top cannot be leveraged by the rest of the crime network, that's a massive problem.
Bingo!

We shouldn’t be worried at all when a guys team reassures us the establishment and donors support him, because that means he controls them.

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldmom
It's amazing to me how some people can still pretend that our DOJ isn't politicized. In some cases they're willing to participate in making crap up from whole cloth. In other cases...well, this.

If you cannot discern the difference, you're an idiot. If you can discern the difference but pretend like there isn't one, you're a liar.
Man you're confusing. You literally got mad, while defending police officers about how they are not all bad and how they can have political positions, while separating it from the job. You once acknowledged that there are some that can't but vast majority can. Now you're saying that the DOJ is politicized because of a few bad apples?

Why can police officers separate their political views when on the job but not the DOJ?

Why is the DOJ considered politicized when vast majority of them do things by the letter of the job but not the police?

Right now, it seems like you only criticize when it benefits your political position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: emekz1 and Mdfgator
Man you're confusing. You literally got mad, while defending police officers about how they are not all bad and how they can have political positions, while separating it from the job. You once acknowledged that there are some that can't but vast majority can. Now you're saying that the DOJ is politicized because of a few bad apples?

I'm confused by your confusion.

I never said individuals in the DOJ couldn't have political opinions. Operating the DOJ as a partisan force is certainly a bad idea, however. That's what I took issue with kalim. Not individuals and their opinions so congrats on the red herring.
 
Why can police officers separate their political views when on the job but not the DOJ?

They can. I'm merely insisting that they do. I don't understand how you missed that.

Why is the DOJ considered politicized when vast majority of them do things by the letter of the job but not the police?

We've itemized several issues with the partisan DOJ.

They participated in an investigation that they 100% knew was made up. From the start they knew it was fake.

Conversely, they seem to be quite a bit less aggressive when others of a different political affiliation are in the crosshairs. I don't understand what is confusing about this.

Right now, it seems like you only criticize when it benefits your political position.

This is you spinning again. DOJ employees can have political views...just like cops.

The DOJ cannot operate as an extension of either political party. This feels obvious.
 
They can. I'm merely insisting that they do. I don't understand how you missed that.



We've itemized several issues with the partisan DOJ.

They participated in an investigation that they 100% knew was made up. From the start they knew it was fake.

Conversely, they seem to be quite a bit less aggressive when others of a different political affiliation are in the crosshairs. I don't understand what is confusing about this.



This is you spinning again. DOJ employees can have political views...just like cops.

The DOJ cannot operate as an extension of either political party. This feels obvious.
The way I interpreted your post was that you're calling the DOJ politicized as an overall unit based on a few politicized examples (that you consider politicized).

Do I interpret your post correctly?
 
The way I interpreted your post was that you're calling the DOJ politicized as an overall unit based on a few politicized examples (that you consider politicized).

Do I interpret your post correctly?

I've stopped caring about how you interpret (see twist and conflate) things TBH.

Read this again. If you're still confused, read it again. Repeat as necessary.


I never said individuals in the DOJ couldn't have political opinions. Operating the DOJ as a partisan force is certainly a bad idea, however. That's what I took issue with kalim. Not individuals and their opinions so congrats on the red herring.
 
Well then he knows who the whistleblower is, which is the most important question in the country right now.

If a credible witness has firsthand knowledge Biden took a $5MM bribe in exchange for policy decisions…it has to be game over, right?

President Kamala is on her way?

Not sure what they do. I think behind the scenes they see Harris as the main problem with getting rid of Joe. She isn't going to just step aside I think. Once the recession hits later this year and more of Biden's crimes come to light I dont see how they can stick with him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NavigatorII
Do you ever?

I think he actually does. But then he manipulates and conflates the conversation in some weird effort to "win." Win what? I have no idea.

I don't think that you can do what he does unless you actually understand the original intent. You can't lie unless you understand the truth...and kalim often seems allergic to truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RussellCasse
CNN reporter.

This is how sheep stay hoodwinked. You don't understand what a whistleblower is.

A whistleblower makes claims. Those claims then lead to an investigation where EVIDENCE is collected.

The statement itself isn't evidence. So claiming that 'while the document contains allegations made by the unnamed whistleblower, it doesn't provide proof they are true' is itself misinformation designed to hoodwink CNN viewers, AKA democrats.

What would happen if a whistleblower came forward about Trump? All they would have to do is MAKE THE CLAIM, and it would be THE story on air 24/7.

But they would have no EVIDENCE of their claims either.

Yet when a whistleblower comes out against a dem, the lefty media goes into propaganda mode.

It's how half this country believes in a world that literally does not exist.
I’m old enough to remember CNN reporting that a witness heard (not the reporter) Trump talking on a tape about having classified docs regarding Iran.

Seemed like that was pretty conclusive?
 
I've stopped caring about how you interpret (see twist and conflate) things TBH.

Read this again. If you're still confused, read it again. Repeat as necessary.
I wanted to be clear because you tend to switch up when you get caught in a tough spot.

So yes, you are calling the DOJ politicized based of a few bad apples but that same logic doesn't apply to police officers, in fact you hate when people do that. Very interesting.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BamaFan1137
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT