For taking bribes from foreign countries in return for selling American sovereignty. Just kidding, it’s Joe Biden.
He's a pretty straight-shooter.If this is what it sounds like…holy crap. I don’t know enough about Grassley to know if he’s just a right wing Adam Schiff.
![]()
Grassley: I've Seen The Whistleblower Doc The FBI Is Hiding
Wray won't turn over documents because he says he wants to protect sources -- but it seems the FBI is actually trying to protect the Bidens.thefederalist.com
Well then he knows who the whistleblower is, which is the most important question in the country right now.He's a pretty straight-shooter.
Nahhh ole lard ass wouldn’t last a day in a penal institution, them ole bucks in there would love his squishy fat tail they’d turn him out day 1You just know @gatorspeed broke two knuckles trying to click and load this thread ASAP.
No they wouldn't. But they would blackmail the shit out of him unless he bought protection first, even if he wasn't president.Nahhh ole lard ass wouldn’t last a day in a penal institution, them ole bucks in there would love his squishy fat tail they’d turn him out day 1
For taking bribes from foreign countries in return for selling American sovereignty. Just kidding, it’s Joe Biden.
CNN reporter.
Many of the pubs are in on the same schemes.Title is misleading
It is well passed time for joey to be put in prison
however, the Pubs have no balls and will let him slide
They haven't had balls in the past but things are different now (some of them). The issue is that Congress doesn't have prosecutorial enforcement powers. They can be good cops and have the whole issue dismissed by the DOJ.Title is misleading
It is well passed time for joey to be put in prison
however, the Pubs have no balls and will let him slide
Hell, I am more confident of news on twitter than news outlets.I was a little skeptical since this was on Twitter but Gateway Pundit is running with it.
![]()
BREAKING: FBI Chief Chris Wray Caves to Comer - Agrees to Hand Over Damning Document Detailing China's $5 Million Bribe to Joe Biden! | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
FBI Director Chris Wray caved to Oversight Chairman James Comer on Friday.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Bingo!Many of the pubs are in on the same schemes.
One of the most salient things Q ever posted was that the people on BOTH sides of the isle that are the most compromised are elevated to the highest positions of government, so that their past deeds can be used to control them.
Also explains why BOTH sides so violently opposed Trump being inserted as President. If you have a mob structure and the guy on the top cannot be leveraged by the rest of the crime network, that's a massive problem.
When Trump loaded up on small dollar donations, we were told it was a red flag that he didn't have big players supporting him.Bingo!
We shouldn’t be worried at all when a guys team reassures us the establishment and donors support him, because that means he controls them.
![]()
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂One of the most salient things Q ever posted
thats a sizeable IF..... ifs and butts were candy and nuts.....If this is what it sounds like…holy crap. I don’t know enough about Grassley to know if he’s just a right wing Adam Schiff.
![]()
Grassley: I've Seen The Whistleblower Doc The FBI Is Hiding
Wray won't turn over documents because he says he wants to protect sources -- but it seems the FBI is actually trying to protect the Bidens.thefederalist.com
Man you're confusing. You literally got mad, while defending police officers about how they are not all bad and how they can have political positions, while separating it from the job. You once acknowledged that there are some that can't but vast majority can. Now you're saying that the DOJ is politicized because of a few bad apples?It's amazing to me how some people can still pretend that our DOJ isn't politicized. In some cases they're willing to participate in making crap up from whole cloth. In other cases...well, this.
If you cannot discern the difference, you're an idiot. If you can discern the difference but pretend like there isn't one, you're a liar.
I can see your therapist telling you this during your last session.Right now, it seems like you only criticize when it benefits your political position.
Man you're confusing. You literally got mad, while defending police officers about how they are not all bad and how they can have political positions, while separating it from the job. You once acknowledged that there are some that can't but vast majority can. Now you're saying that the DOJ is politicized because of a few bad apples?
Why can police officers separate their political views when on the job but not the DOJ?
Why is the DOJ considered politicized when vast majority of them do things by the letter of the job but not the police?
Right now, it seems like you only criticize when it benefits your political position.
The way I interpreted your post was that you're calling the DOJ politicized as an overall unit based on a few politicized examples (that you consider politicized).They can. I'm merely insisting that they do. I don't understand how you missed that.
We've itemized several issues with the partisan DOJ.
They participated in an investigation that they 100% knew was made up. From the start they knew it was fake.
Conversely, they seem to be quite a bit less aggressive when others of a different political affiliation are in the crosshairs. I don't understand what is confusing about this.
This is you spinning again. DOJ employees can have political views...just like cops.
The DOJ cannot operate as an extension of either political party. This feels obvious.
Do you ever?Do I interpret your post correctly?
The way I interpreted your post was that you're calling the DOJ politicized as an overall unit based on a few politicized examples (that you consider politicized).
Do I interpret your post correctly?
I never said individuals in the DOJ couldn't have political opinions. Operating the DOJ as a partisan force is certainly a bad idea, however. That's what I took issue with kalim. Not individuals and their opinions so congrats on the red herring.
Well then he knows who the whistleblower is, which is the most important question in the country right now.
If a credible witness has firsthand knowledge Biden took a $5MM bribe in exchange for policy decisions…it has to be game over, right?
President Kamala is on her way?
Do you ever?
I’m old enough to remember CNN reporting that a witness heard (not the reporter) Trump talking on a tape about having classified docs regarding Iran.CNN reporter.
This is how sheep stay hoodwinked. You don't understand what a whistleblower is.
A whistleblower makes claims. Those claims then lead to an investigation where EVIDENCE is collected.
The statement itself isn't evidence. So claiming that 'while the document contains allegations made by the unnamed whistleblower, it doesn't provide proof they are true' is itself misinformation designed to hoodwink CNN viewers, AKA democrats.
What would happen if a whistleblower came forward about Trump? All they would have to do is MAKE THE CLAIM, and it would be THE story on air 24/7.
But they would have no EVIDENCE of their claims either.
Yet when a whistleblower comes out against a dem, the lefty media goes into propaganda mode.
It's how half this country believes in a world that literally does not exist.
He got us off talking about how his guy is a criminal.I think he actually does. But then he manipulates and conflates the conversation in some weird effort to "win." Win what? I have no idea.
I wanted to be clear because you tend to switch up when you get caught in a tough spot.I've stopped caring about how you interpret (see twist and conflate) things TBH.
Read this again. If you're still confused, read it again. Repeat as necessary.
Defund the cops. Only cops that are good are the ones that work for me.the DOJ and the FBI are both compromised and corrupt
That's exactly what I'm seeingDefund the cops. Only cops that are good are the ones that work for me.