The Walls Are Closing In On The Traitors in Congress.
- Thread starter instaGATOR
- Start date
Right now, biased over politicized judges are in a duel with the Trump Administration attempting to side-rail any and all of his EO's to stop or slowdown and stall the process that the voters elected this President to accomplish.
Judge's decisions, over-ruled rates, and consequences for being over-ruled too often.
Several mechanisms exist to challenge or overturn a judge’s decision. Intermediate appellate courts review decisions made by lower courts to ensure the law is applied correctly. They do not conduct new trials but assess the lower court proceedings for legal errors.
Typically, about 10% of a judge's final orders, plus or minus, are appealed and about 30%-70% of them are overturned on appeal (so, 3-7% of their final orders are ultimately overturned on appeal). Appeal rates are higher for criminal cases, but success rates on appeal are lower.
Being overturned on appeal is not, by itself, seen as gross misconduct. There could be ways to assure an independent judiciary while penalizing lower judges when they are overruled by higher judges, but doing so would work towards enforcing conformity and make the individual hesitate to go against the perceived mainstream. However, if a judge is getting reversed all the time that’s something a chief judge may consider when it comes to assigning that judge to certain rooms or venues. There are actions that can be taken to when a judge “gets it wrong,” but the time limits are short so it is important to act swiftly. A judge can make an erroneous ruling in a divorce, child custody, child support, criminal defense, tort lawsuit, or any other type of case.
The most common recourse is to appeal the judge’s erroneous ruling to a higher court.
Appellate courts can overturn lower court decisions that unfairly ignore or misapply the law. The appeals process provides a key check on judges who disregard the law.
Reprimand: Judges may be reprimanded publicly for their unethical behavior. Additional education: The just may have to complete additional education as a corrective measure.
Suspension: A judge may face suspension, either with or without pay, for a specified period of time.
Can a president get rid of a federal judge? Federal judges can only be removed through Impeachment by the House of Representatives and conviction in the Senate. Judges and Justices serve no fixed term — they serve until their death, retirement, or conviction by the Senate.
The only conditions that can be grounds for their removal are proven misbehavior and incapacity to act as judge. Article 124 of the Constitution states that by an order of the President that even a Supreme Court justice can be removed from his or her office.
Some jurisdictions (as in Free Florida) have elected judges that are put there by the 'sovereign citizens of the Republic of Florida, who have to run for re-election. If they have "performance problems" (such as an inordinate number of cases being overturned), you can count on their opponents to trot them out prior to the election. (where they can become un-elected)
-----
While in Demonrat run places like Boston, where judges are appointed, nothing happens.
Often, they get laterally promoted (or actually promoted!).
==========
So, where does the fault/blame reside when politics and/or politicians go evil?
Or when judges sell out their required neutrality to any bias?
Or when entrenched teachers or life long bureaucrats begin to erode the freedoms of all.
-----
A majority of Americans have long FAILED IN THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES AS CITIZENS.
So it's 'look in the mirror' time all around, because the attitude of 'Let George Do It' aint working well, and it never has.....
Civic engagement takes those responsibilities further by working on problems that affect everyone in the community. Citizenship is the common thread that connects all Americans. We are a nation bound by the shared values of freedom, liberty, and equality. Explore some of the rights and responsibilities you will gain as a citizen. It is the responsibility of American citizens to inform themselves, then vote, and engage in civil discourse at all levels: local, state, and national. At the local level, active participation probably has the most immediate effect, since it is local politics that has the most direct effect on everyday life of most Americans.
(so get up off your asses and 'giterdone')
Judge's decisions, over-ruled rates, and consequences for being over-ruled too often.
Several mechanisms exist to challenge or overturn a judge’s decision. Intermediate appellate courts review decisions made by lower courts to ensure the law is applied correctly. They do not conduct new trials but assess the lower court proceedings for legal errors.
Typically, about 10% of a judge's final orders, plus or minus, are appealed and about 30%-70% of them are overturned on appeal (so, 3-7% of their final orders are ultimately overturned on appeal). Appeal rates are higher for criminal cases, but success rates on appeal are lower.
Being overturned on appeal is not, by itself, seen as gross misconduct. There could be ways to assure an independent judiciary while penalizing lower judges when they are overruled by higher judges, but doing so would work towards enforcing conformity and make the individual hesitate to go against the perceived mainstream. However, if a judge is getting reversed all the time that’s something a chief judge may consider when it comes to assigning that judge to certain rooms or venues. There are actions that can be taken to when a judge “gets it wrong,” but the time limits are short so it is important to act swiftly. A judge can make an erroneous ruling in a divorce, child custody, child support, criminal defense, tort lawsuit, or any other type of case.
The most common recourse is to appeal the judge’s erroneous ruling to a higher court.
Appellate courts can overturn lower court decisions that unfairly ignore or misapply the law. The appeals process provides a key check on judges who disregard the law.
Reprimand: Judges may be reprimanded publicly for their unethical behavior. Additional education: The just may have to complete additional education as a corrective measure.
Suspension: A judge may face suspension, either with or without pay, for a specified period of time.
Can a president get rid of a federal judge? Federal judges can only be removed through Impeachment by the House of Representatives and conviction in the Senate. Judges and Justices serve no fixed term — they serve until their death, retirement, or conviction by the Senate.
The only conditions that can be grounds for their removal are proven misbehavior and incapacity to act as judge. Article 124 of the Constitution states that by an order of the President that even a Supreme Court justice can be removed from his or her office.
Some jurisdictions (as in Free Florida) have elected judges that are put there by the 'sovereign citizens of the Republic of Florida, who have to run for re-election. If they have "performance problems" (such as an inordinate number of cases being overturned), you can count on their opponents to trot them out prior to the election. (where they can become un-elected)
-----
While in Demonrat run places like Boston, where judges are appointed, nothing happens.
Often, they get laterally promoted (or actually promoted!).
==========
So, where does the fault/blame reside when politics and/or politicians go evil?
Or when judges sell out their required neutrality to any bias?
Or when entrenched teachers or life long bureaucrats begin to erode the freedoms of all.
-----
A majority of Americans have long FAILED IN THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES AS CITIZENS.
So it's 'look in the mirror' time all around, because the attitude of 'Let George Do It' aint working well, and it never has.....
Civic engagement takes those responsibilities further by working on problems that affect everyone in the community. Citizenship is the common thread that connects all Americans. We are a nation bound by the shared values of freedom, liberty, and equality. Explore some of the rights and responsibilities you will gain as a citizen. It is the responsibility of American citizens to inform themselves, then vote, and engage in civil discourse at all levels: local, state, and national. At the local level, active participation probably has the most immediate effect, since it is local politics that has the most direct effect on everyday life of most Americans.
(so get up off your asses and 'giterdone')
Should I Consider U.S. Citizenship? | USCIS
Citizenship is the common thread that connects all Americans. We are a nation bound not by race or religion, but by the shared values of freedom, liberty, and equality. Throughout our h
www.uscis.gov
