ADVERTISEMENT

Tariffs

Actually I’m questioning the tariff revenue numbers, or more precisely if they represent a net positive when you take costs into account, and asking the question why it’s necessary to subsidize American industry with taxpayer money if the tariffs are in fact a net positive.

I try to keep you up with the discussion Ghost, but I haven’t figured out how to type phonetically yet.
Again, revenue to Treasury is fungible. You do know what that means, don't you?
 
I commented early in this thread but hopefully the below helps some of the Trump tactic doubters understand how negotiations work. However, to open I’ll just say no one knows what the end result will be, and the short and long term impacts on the US economy.

1) No one and I mean no one, starts a major contract negotiation on this scale to improve their position without having leverage and a goal to improve their situation of a current trade agreement. However, when you control over 50% of the world’s consumption power, you are in a position of strength, regardless of debt.

2) Tariff use is only the front end attention getter. Not only are they effective in getting your current Trade partner’s attention which you’re trying to remedy issues with, it lets the others you’re not currently trading with have to have an opportunity in prospecting their alternative options to you.

3) During the negotiations, there will be lots of posturing from both sides of the table. As new alternative options emerge for Trump and the other side sees this (foreign investment, new trade partners, and better negotiated trade deals with smaller partners removing or reducing tariffs from their markets etc) the reliance on the bigger vested trade partners is diminished and further leverage is gained with your main Trade partners like China.

3) So new tariff/trade deals are already on the table from other countries not wanting to miss this opportunity. Foreign company investments are being made in US based production to not lose their market share and US companies are shifting production back to USA and shifting money and some jobs here. When foreign product is built here, it will reduce consumer cost either through transportation savings or working around tariff impacts to make them competitive in the US markets. Did I mention we represent over 50% of the world’s consumption power? Again, leverage.

4) Trump’s goal is not to tariff the world and make the US richer again that way. His goal is to make America’s trade deals better and the US stronger financially, that’s it How we get there is going to be a combination of things imo and all are better for the long term health of this country. I implore you to look past the legacy media fear mongering, as things are moving very positively early. We are seeing concessions on both sides as a resulting outcome. (US/China)

In closing, this isn’t about politics, it’s about business and improving our debt situation and future trade reliance outside of the US. Some foreign investment will take longer but there are both short term and long term impacts in all this. So don’t look at 5 years down the line for foreign factory production as a downside, it’s for long term gains for our country and to open discussions on other products which foreign countries tariff us on for entry today. US products will also be opened for markets in many of these countries where foreign tariff barriers have excluded them prior, again making Us companies more profitable and able to expand their global footprint.

Sit back and watch it unfold, get past your short term impacts and propaganda (see today’s market news on recession fears, lol) things will be bumpy but I can honestly say it’s going better than I expected which likely means it will get better faster too. China has to figure out how to manage it publicly with their own country as they portray a tough exterior but make no mistake about it, we represent so much buying power, they don’t want to lose it. The fact we are two of the largest production and consuming entities working together means they’ll find a way to compromise. And at this point, Trump’s improving of the US situation will not only reduce our debt quicker but set the stage for better negotiations going forward with other nations globally.

Meantime, just sit back and watch it all unfold.
Thanks Gator. This is the most well written analysis and explanation of what and why Trump is moving forward with the use of tariffs than I have read anywhere. If someone can't read what you have written and understand what is happening, then they have a serious problem of comprehension.
 
From a negotiating POV, yes.

Losing - well, companies are pulling back spend due to tariffs, DOGE, which is why, in part we saw the lackluster job growth and .3 percent GDP contraction. Raises and bonuses will be less. That’s current income.

If then you pull back (which we have), it lowers growth. It can be a cycle.

Agreed on long term holdings. Bad time to sell. I bought a lot at prices not seen in years (think Mag-7)
VERY simple solution...BUY AMERICAN...and this is the intention. No tariffs on American made goods. And the car business sure is doing quite well despite tariffs. We are down from 150 new vehicles on our lot, to 30. So I am not buying overall companies pulling back...unless they support our adversary China. The place that killed millions with covid, and want to end American power.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gators2014
I commented early in this thread but hopefully the below helps some of the Trump tactic doubters understand how negotiations work. However, to open I’ll just say no one knows what the end result will be, and the short and long term impacts on the US economy.

1) No one and I mean no one, starts a major contract negotiation on this scale to improve their position without having leverage and a goal to improve their situation of a current trade agreement. However, when you control over 50% of the world’s consumption power, you are in a position of strength, regardless of debt.

2) Tariff use is only the front end attention getter. Not only are they effective in getting your current Trade partner’s attention which you’re trying to remedy issues with, it lets the others you’re not currently trading with have to have an opportunity in prospecting their alternative options to you.

3) During the negotiations, there will be lots of posturing from both sides of the table. As new alternative options emerge for Trump and the other side sees this (foreign investment, new trade partners, and better negotiated trade deals with smaller partners removing or reducing tariffs from their markets etc) the reliance on the bigger vested trade partners is diminished and further leverage is gained with your main Trade partners like China.

3) So new tariff/trade deals are already on the table from other countries not wanting to miss this opportunity. Foreign company investments are being made in US based production to not lose their market share and US companies are shifting production back to USA and shifting money and some jobs here. When foreign product is built here, it will reduce consumer cost either through transportation savings or working around tariff impacts to make them competitive in the US markets. Did I mention we represent over 50% of the world’s consumption power? Again, leverage.

4) Trump’s goal is not to tariff the world and make the US richer again that way. His goal is to make America’s trade deals better and the US stronger financially, that’s it How we get there is going to be a combination of things imo and all are better for the long term health of this country. I implore you to look past the legacy media fear mongering, as things are moving very positively early. We are seeing concessions on both sides as a resulting outcome. (US/China)

In closing, this isn’t about politics, it’s about business and improving our debt situation and future trade reliance outside of the US. Some foreign investment will take longer but there are both short term and long term impacts in all this. So don’t look at 5 years down the line for foreign factory production as a downside, it’s for long term gains for our country and to open discussions on other products which foreign countries tariff us on for entry today. US products will also be opened for markets in many of these countries where foreign tariff barriers have excluded them prior, again making Us companies more profitable and able to expand their global footprint.

Sit back and watch it unfold, get past your short term impacts and propaganda (see today’s market news on recession fears, lol) things will be bumpy but I can honestly say it’s going better than I expected which likely means it will get better faster too. China has to figure out how to manage it publicly with their own country as they portray a tough exterior but make no mistake about it, we represent so much buying power, they don’t want to lose it. The fact we are two of the largest production and consuming entities working together means they’ll find a way to compromise. And at this point, Trump’s improving of the US situation will not only reduce our debt quicker but set the stage for better negotiations going forward with other nations globally.

Meantime, just sit back and watch it all unfold.
Excellent explanation. The people that need to read this the most will likely ignore. Such is life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gators2014
I don’t say that - at all. At least try to get it right.

Take immigration.

What I said there on Trump, again, and again, and again.

I’ll give you a hint, it rhymes with “A plus”
You did get immigration right. You also said his stance on abortion would crush him and pubs. Both cruised to easy wins. You also said he was wrong about tariffs. Early signs are that will be another winner for him.

On the reverse Ghost, you think everything he does is perfectly thought out or when it doesn’t work out, is “stolen”.

He is a matter of “theology” for you. Which is fine.

Most of my comments be it on abortion, “mean tweets”, J6, taking credit for OWS or now the broad application of tariffs, is don’t let the 20 percent tank the 80 percent.
I go on his track record. If he has a track record for performing well, I continue to believe he will perform well.

It's not that hard.
 
Remember when Kalim tried to clown us about watching too much FOX when in fact almost if not all of us ditched FOX years ago, then cried about it?

 
Might want to check those numbers.
You're right, @GhostOfMatchesMalone has no freaking clue what he's talking about.

1 year ago today the DOW was at 37,903. Right now it's at 41,023. That's +8.2%.

1 year ago today the S&P was at 5018. Right now it's at 5651. That's +12.6%

1 year ago today the NASDAQ was at 15,605. Right now it's at 17,878. That's +14.6%.
 
You're right, @GhostOfMatchesMalone has no freaking clue what he's talking about.

1 year ago today the DOW was at 37,903. Right now it's at 41,023. That's +8.2%.

1 year ago today the S&P was at 5018. Right now it's at 5651. That's +12.6%

1 year ago today the NASDAQ was at 15,605. Right now it's at 17,878. That's +14.6%.
He got excited because the market dipped on weaker than expected GDP yesterday. The GDP was weaker than expected cause imports surged. Imports surged cause countries were trying to get their goods in before Trump's tariffs kicked in.

Which, ironically, proves the tariffs DO work.

So the markets have gained 8-14% in the last year. @grandhavendiddy thats what you remind the in laws the next time they call.
 
He doesn’t think anything through. He said he was going to get an Ukraine ceasefire immediately. He hasn’t.

He said he’d get a ceasefire in Gaza, he hasnt.

He said he’d open up the Red Sea. He hasn’t,

He said people were lining up for trade deals with us. They’re not.

The point is all these things are extremely hard. You can’t just make them happen by executive order.

Then when he can’t deliver, he looks like a clown to everyone but the maga voters, who let’s be honest, aren’t the most demanding crew. No matter how badly he screws up, all he has to do is hold up a picture of a Latin person and say he’s a gang member, or hold up a picture of a purple haired tranny.
You're like a toddler who cries if he doesn't get what he wants RIGHT NOW. Most voters don't take a minute by minute approach to voting decisions. They'll look back at a body of work when they enter the ballot box.

1) He's got both sides talking, and now there appears to be a rare earth minerals deal with Ukraine in the works. We're as close as we've ever been to reaching peace. What did Biden do to end the war?
2) Hamas leaders just left Cairo seeking peace. It's a centuries-long conflict, it's not going to happen overnight https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/26/middleeast/hamas-cairo-ceasefire-hostage-talks-intl-latam/index.html
3) Again, he's working on it. It's messy. This one may not go his way. You can't win them all. https://gcaptain.com/operation-roug...-houthi-targets-as-shipping-crisis-continues/
4) Yes, they are. You have no clue what you're talking about, once again. https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/here-every-country-working-trade-deals-us

You're right, they are hard. We just hit the 100 day mark. Put your binkie back in, grab blanky, and let the adults work on these issues.
 
I like how lefties will say something to the effect of “ well yeah, everyone knows we have to do something about trade, but trump is doing it a stupid way”…. All the while they have never, ever done anything but aid china in the process. They got no plan, in fact, they denied this even a problem until 5 minutes ago.
 
I like how lefties will say something to the effect of “ well yeah, everyone knows we have to do something about trade, but trump is doing it a stupid way”…. All the while they have never, ever done anything but aid china in the process. They got no plan, in fact, they denied this even a problem until 5 minutes ago.
Ray Charles can see how this will be AMAZING for our economy when it all gets done. EVERY trade deal will be exponentially better for the USA. Libs just are against ANYTHING Trump wants now. They have not come forward with ONE single idea to help...just against anything Trump wants. What they fail to realize is...most of America is on to them now for opening the borders, covering up FJB's dementia, and 25% inflation. They are not on a sustainable path
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gators2014
You're like a toddler who cries if he doesn't get what he wants RIGHT NOW. Most voters don't take a minute by minute approach to voting decisions. They'll look back at a body of work when they enter the ballot box.

1) He's got both sides talking, and now there appears to be a rare earth minerals deal with Ukraine in the works. We're as close as we've ever been to reaching peace. What did Biden do to end the war?
2) Hamas leaders just left Cairo seeking peace. It's a centuries-long conflict, it's not going to happen overnight https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/26/middleeast/hamas-cairo-ceasefire-hostage-talks-intl-latam/index.html
3) Again, he's working on it. It's messy. This one may not go his way. You can't win them all. https://gcaptain.com/operation-roug...-houthi-targets-as-shipping-crisis-continues/
4) Yes, they are. You have no clue what you're talking about, once again. https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/here-every-country-working-trade-deals-us

You're right, they are hard. We just hit the 100 day mark. Put your binkie back in, grab blanky, and let the adults work on these issues.
I can tell you living in an area where there are 2 SF's bases and one huge test base that something is going to happen concerning Iran/Houthi's REAL soon. You can just feel it around here. I can tell you our active duty feel that they are going to be called on soon.
(not to go over....talking about the people deployed already) They are on high alert. (this could be to put pressure on Iran, or it could be we ARE going to attack soon. I think the latter)
 
It seems he doesn't understand why Trump is doing what he does, so he assumes Trump doesnt know what he is doing either.
I do have some concerning news.

Our Builder rep (he calls on the big track home builders, like Ryan Homes, as well as the national multi family builders) was at corporate today and his update was no bueno.

The single family projects are decent, they project flat to slightly down. But the multi family builders who would normally have 60-80 projects going on might have 2-5 right now. Investors are scared and sitting on the sidelines waiting to see how things play out. No capital = 2025 projects become 2026 projects.

It doesn’t really affect our core business, but it’s more of a concerning signal more broadly.
 
I do have some concerning news.

Our Builder rep (he calls on the big track home builders, like Ryan Homes, as well as the national multi family builders) was at corporate today and his update was no bueno.

The single family projects are decent, they project flat to slightly down. But the multi family builders who would normally have 60-80 projects going on might have 2-5 right now. Investors are scared and sitting on the sidelines waiting to see how things play out. No capital = 2025 projects become 2026 projects.

It doesn’t really affect our core business, but it’s more of a concerning signal more broadly.
My step son has been in Construction business for 20 years. they have slowed down. I asked him why....he said "no workers, they are gone" Self deportation I guess....
 
You're right, @GhostOfMatchesMalone has no freaking clue what he's talking about.

1 year ago today the DOW was at 37,903. Right now it's at 41,023. That's +8.2%.

1 year ago today the S&P was at 5018. Right now it's at 5651. That's +12.6%

1 year ago today the NASDAQ was at 15,605. Right now it's at 17,878. That's +14.6%.
From ChatGPT:
As of May 1, 2025, here are the approximate one-year returns for the major U.S. stock indices:


  • S&P 500: The index has returned approximately 6.80% over the past year. YCharts+1YCharts+1
  • NASDAQ Composite: The index has returned approximately 12.52% over the past year. MarketWatch
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average: The index has returned approximately 7.07% over the past year.


Not identical, but directionally right. 6.8% is not (historically) great, but not bad. It's off 300-400 basis points, in nominal terms.

The average annual return of the S&P 500 since 1926 is approximately:


10%–11% per year (nominal)


  • This includes both capital appreciation and dividends.
  • The real return (adjusted for inflation) is closer to 7% per year.

Breakdown:​


  • Price return only: ~7.5% annually
  • Dividends: ~2%–3% annually (varies by decade)
  • Inflation: ~2%–3% annually on average, reducing real returns

This long-term average smooths over substantial volatility, including major downturns (e.g., Great Depression, 2008 crisis) and bull markets (e.g., post-WWII boom, 2010s).

Now - where @bradleygator is correct, is that these up turns have happened when: a) tariffs are getting paused or removed and b) when Bessent and not Navarro has been the "adult in the room".

My post on Tariffs (this thread) said (essentially, but feel free to pull the receipts), "Trump's success is not getting dragged down ideologically but Navarro."

I am 100% with @Capt Ron 1 that says, "all is well that ends well". My stock portfolio is up. I bought a LOT of MSFT at ~360. It is trading at 430 now. I am likely going to sell, take a short run hit (but perhaps not) and diversify out.

So...let's keep following the data and give credit where credit is due is when Trump makes adjustments and the numbers prove to be positive.
 
From ChatGPT:
As of May 1, 2025, here are the approximate one-year returns for the major U.S. stock indices:


  • S&P 500: The index has returned approximately 6.80% over the past year. YCharts+1YCharts+1
  • NASDAQ Composite: The index has returned approximately 12.52% over the past year. MarketWatch
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average: The index has returned approximately 7.07% over the past year.


Not identical, but directionally right. 6.8% is not (historically) great, but not bad. It's off 300-400 basis points, in nominal terms.

The average annual return of the S&P 500 since 1926 is approximately:


10%–11% per year (nominal)


  • This includes both capital appreciation and dividends.
  • The real return (adjusted for inflation) is closer to 7% per year.

Breakdown:​


  • Price return only: ~7.5% annually
  • Dividends: ~2%–3% annually (varies by decade)
  • Inflation: ~2%–3% annually on average, reducing real returns

This long-term average smooths over substantial volatility, including major downturns (e.g., Great Depression, 2008 crisis) and bull markets (e.g., post-WWII boom, 2010s).

Now - where @bradleygator is correct, is that these up turns have happened when: a) tariffs are getting paused or removed and b) when Bessent and not Navarro has been the "adult in the room".

My post on Tariffs (this thread) said (essentially, but feel free to pull the receipts), "Trump's success is not getting dragged down ideologically but Navarro."

I am 100% with @Capt Ron 1 that says, "all is well that ends well". My stock portfolio is up. I bought a LOT of MSFT at ~360. It is trading at 430 now. I am likely going to sell, take a short run hit (but perhaps not) and diversify out.

So...let's keep following the data and give credit where credit is due is when Trump makes adjustments and the numbers prove to be positive.
I honestly believe the only ay this can go is WAY up. Might have another big bump in the road....but short lived I believe. By the mid terms...this economy will be singing like never before.
 
I honestly believe the only ay this can go is WAY up. Might have another big bump in the road....but short lived I believe. By the mid terms...this economy will be singing like never before.
What IS true is that people have short memories. If MSFT is at 475 and the S&P is at 5,750 come next year and there are a series of trade deals, GM committing to build new plants not just take up Fort Wayne unused capacity, new investments and the 10 year sitting at 3.5 or so, along with real regulatory reform, etc. the right should have a very good outcome in the mid-terms.

I try to avoid TDS and TSS. But I look at results. The border has been an A+. Only judges and progressives are getting in his and the countries way. Oil is way down. $2.99 is many places where I live. That is a great answer. DEI is being purged. A to A+.

Need to get this right while shifting 40 years of (insert your uncharitable term) of going only to the lowest cost locations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
What IS true is that people have short memories. If MSFT is at 475 and the S&P is at 5,750 come next year and there are a series of trade deals, GM committing to build new plants not just take up Fort Wayne unused capacity, new investments and the 10 year sitting at 3.5 or so, along with real regulatory reform, etc. the right should have a very good outcome in the mid-terms.

I try to avoid TDS and TSS. But I look at results. The border has been an A+. Only judges and progressives are getting in his and the countries way. Oil is way down. $2.99 is many places where I live. That is a great answer. DEI is being purged. A to A+.

Need to get this right while shifting 40 years of (insert your uncharitable term) of going only to the lowest cost locations.
I fully agree here.
 
My step son has been in Construction business for 20 years. they have slowed down. I asked him why....he said "no workers, they are gone" Self deportation I guess....
Our warehouse (where certain products are fabricated and kitted) is like being in Mexico. Absolutely no change or problems finding workers since Trump took office. But it's literally polka music and no English at all in that building.
 
What IS true is that people have short memories. If MSFT is at 475 and the S&P is at 5,750 come next year and there are a series of trade deals, GM committing to build new plants not just take up Fort Wayne unused capacity, new investments and the 10 year sitting at 3.5 or so, along with real regulatory reform, etc. the right should have a very good outcome in the mid-terms.

I try to avoid TDS and TSS. But I look at results. The border has been an A+. Only judges and progressives are getting in his and the countries way. Oil is way down. $2.99 is many places where I live. That is a great answer. DEI is being purged. A to A+.

Need to get this right while shifting 40 years of (insert your uncharitable term) of going only to the lowest cost locations.
No one is going to get everything right, but I don't understand how any reasonable person is upset.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCSpell
From ChatGPT:
As of May 1, 2025, here are the approximate one-year returns for the major U.S. stock indices:


  • S&P 500: The index has returned approximately 6.80% over the past year. YCharts+1YCharts+1
  • NASDAQ Composite: The index has returned approximately 12.52% over the past year. MarketWatch
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average: The index has returned approximately 7.07% over the past year.


Not identical, but directionally right. 6.8% is not (historically) great, but not bad. It's off 300-400 basis points, in nominal terms.

The average annual return of the S&P 500 since 1926 is approximately:


10%–11% per year (nominal)


  • This includes both capital appreciation and dividends.
  • The real return (adjusted for inflation) is closer to 7% per year.

Breakdown:​


  • Price return only: ~7.5% annually
  • Dividends: ~2%–3% annually (varies by decade)
  • Inflation: ~2%–3% annually on average, reducing real returns

This long-term average smooths over substantial volatility, including major downturns (e.g., Great Depression, 2008 crisis) and bull markets (e.g., post-WWII boom, 2010s).

Now - where @bradleygator is correct, is that these up turns have happened when: a) tariffs are getting paused or removed and b) when Bessent and not Navarro has been the "adult in the room".

My post on Tariffs (this thread) said (essentially, but feel free to pull the receipts), "Trump's success is not getting dragged down ideologically but Navarro."

I am 100% with @Capt Ron 1 that says, "all is well that ends well". My stock portfolio is up. I bought a LOT of MSFT at ~360. It is trading at 430 now. I am likely going to sell, take a short run hit (but perhaps not) and diversify out.

So...let's keep following the data and give credit where credit is due is when Trump makes adjustments and the numbers prove to be positive.
My numbers were literally a point in time (whenever I hit post reply).
 
  • Like
Reactions: grandhavendiddy
From ChatGPT:
As of May 1, 2025, here are the approximate one-year returns for the major U.S. stock indices:


  • S&P 500: The index has returned approximately 6.80% over the past year. YCharts+1YCharts+1
  • NASDAQ Composite: The index has returned approximately 12.52% over the past year. MarketWatch
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average: The index has returned approximately 7.07% over the past year.


Not identical, but directionally right. 6.8% is not (historically) great, but not bad. It's off 300-400 basis points, in nominal terms.

The average annual return of the S&P 500 since 1926 is approximately:


10%–11% per year (nominal)


  • This includes both capital appreciation and dividends.
  • The real return (adjusted for inflation) is closer to 7% per year.

Breakdown:​


  • Price return only: ~7.5% annually
  • Dividends: ~2%–3% annually (varies by decade)
  • Inflation: ~2%–3% annually on average, reducing real returns

This long-term average smooths over substantial volatility, including major downturns (e.g., Great Depression, 2008 crisis) and bull markets (e.g., post-WWII boom, 2010s).

Now - where @bradleygator is correct, is that these up turns have happened when: a) tariffs are getting paused or removed and b) when Bessent and not Navarro has been the "adult in the room".

My post on Tariffs (this thread) said (essentially, but feel free to pull the receipts), "Trump's success is not getting dragged down ideologically but Navarro."

I am 100% with @Capt Ron 1 that says, "all is well that ends well". My stock portfolio is up. I bought a LOT of MSFT at ~360. It is trading at 430 now. I am likely going to sell, take a short run hit (but perhaps not) and diversify out.

So...let's keep following the data and give credit where credit is due is when Trump makes adjustments and the numbers prove to be positive.
My numbers were literally a point in time (whenever I hit post reply).
 
Nissan is struggling. They supposedly have ~18 months to right the ship. I saw an add that promoted the fact they were tariff free because the cars are made here. It may help them with a come back. They have to fix the transmission issue that have given them a bad rap over the years.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: nail1988
He got excited because the market dipped on weaker than expected GDP yesterday. The GDP was weaker than expected cause imports surged. Imports surged cause countries were trying to get their goods in before Trump's tariffs kicked in.

Which, ironically, proves the tariffs DO work.

So the markets have gained 8-14% in the last year. @grandhavendiddy thats what you remind the in laws the next time they call.
Listening to the radio the other day. If imports had been normal, instead of the increase, GDP would have been around 2% for the quarter.
They also talked about how Biden's GDPs #s were not really accurate, as all were over inflated because of all the Government spending.
They also predicted that once the tariffs or new trade deals kick in and our Exports increase and Imports decrease, the GDP well take off.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT