ADVERTISEMENT

Sheep I thought yall said wearing a mask worked?

Masks mandated in Alabama starting tomorrow at 5PM CDT. If I understand it correctly, the fine will be $500 in areas where one cannot social distance.
 
Perhaps there are still laggards worried about CO2 poisoning? LOL

Or perhaps masks don't do shit but identify the sheep more easily.

This isn't rocket surgery: If masks work, then places that have mandated mask wearing would have seen a massive decline in cases and deaths after mandating them.

They haven't. It's a hoax. Sheep on a roll in 2020.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueEyedGator17
Or perhaps masks don't do shit but identify the sheep more easily.

This isn't rocket surgery: If masks work, then places that have mandated mask wearing would have seen a massive decline in cases and deaths after mandating them.

They haven't. It's a hoax. Sheep on a roll in 2020.

They have. Stay fact-free my friend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UF_GATOR_FAN
A perfect example of the blind leading the blind.....
Completely devoid of evidence and logic

We were told masks stop the spread of hoax flu.

Areas that have mandated the wearing of masks, are still seeing hoax flu cases spread.

That proves masks do NOT stop the spread of hoax flu. Simple as that.
 
He's not wearing a mask. Please stop getting your information from shit sources.
200711185808-03-trump-walter-reed-0711-exlarge-169.jpg


https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/15/politics/coronavirus-partisan-gap-analysis/index.html

Do you think that this is photo-shopped? Or will you admit to being wrong? Aren't you the same medical expert that tried to say the flu shot and the flu vaccine were different?
 
We were told masks stop the spread of hoax flu.

Areas that have mandated the wearing of masks, are still seeing hoax flu cases spread.

That proves masks do NOT stop the spread of hoax flu. Simple as that.
So why are members of the trump administration, including trump himself (as pictured above), wearing masks if: 1) the whole thing is a hoax and/or 2) masks don't do any good?
Ghost, perhaps you should give donny (aka putin's puppet) a call and fill him in on your medical research??

Your entire post is filled with incorrect assumptions, but that's par for the course with the trumpettes.
 
200711185808-03-trump-walter-reed-0711-exlarge-169.jpg


https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/15/politics/coronavirus-partisan-gap-analysis/index.html

Do you think that this is photo-shopped? Or will you admit to being wrong? Aren't you the same medical expert that tried to say the flu shot and the flu vaccine were different?

Trump wore a black mask as he arrives to visit with wounded military members during a visit to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland. The institution requires mask-wearing.

Masks do help prevent the spreading of infectious bacteria. o_O
But he removed the mask as soon as he departed the hospital. :cool:

As with most of us, he'll wear a mask when it is required for medical reasons, but not when it is optional. And notice that in 6 months, he's not contracted the Communist Red Chinese Kung Flu. :p


PS
When I helped (lamaze) birth my children, I was robed and masked (required), and that was decades before the Kung Flu....
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: gatordad3
200711185808-03-trump-walter-reed-0711-exlarge-169.jpg


https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/15/politics/coronavirus-partisan-gap-analysis/index.html

Do you think that this is photo-shopped? Or will you admit to being wrong? Aren't you the same medical expert that tried to say the flu shot and the flu vaccine were different?

You said he was 'now wearing a mask'. He isn't. He wore a mask ONCE while visiting sick veterans. That was the smart thing to do, and notice NONE of you sheep here gave him credit for it.

Since then, he hasn't worn a mask. Now I'll ask you the same question: Can you admit that you were wrong about him now wearing a mask?
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatordad3
So why are members of the trump administration, including trump himself (as pictured above), wearing masks if: 1) the whole thing is a hoax and/or 2) masks don't do any good?
Ghost, perhaps you should give donny (aka putin's puppet) a call and fill him in on your medical research??

Your entire post is filled with incorrect assumptions, but that's par for the course with the trumpettes.

See above. He wore a mask ONCE while visiting sick patients. Smart thing to do, and none of you sheep gave him credit.

He hasn't worn one since, so he is NOT wearing one now as you claimed.

Sheep told us wearing a mask would save lives. There's no proof it has. If that claim were valid, we would see a dramatic decrease in the number of hoax flu cases in areas where mask usage is mandated.

Which two states have the most hoax flu cases? NY and NJ. Both states mandate wearing masks.

Dots connect themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatordad3
We were told masks stop the spread of hoax flu.

Areas that have mandated the wearing of masks, are still seeing hoax flu cases spread.

That proves masks do NOT stop the spread of hoax flu. Simple as that.

Please learn some science theory. Correlation does not equal causation. sigh
 
  • Like
Reactions: sadgator
You said he was 'now wearing a mask'. He isn't. He wore a mask ONCE while visiting sick veterans. That was the smart thing to do, and notice NONE of you sheep here gave him credit for it.

Since then, he hasn't worn a mask. Now I'll ask you the same question: Can you admit that you were wrong about him now wearing a mask?
HAHAAHAHA
You know from a moment-to-moment basis, when putin's puppet is wearing a mask? lol

"When asked whether he would wear one, the president said: "If I were in a tight situation with people I would, absolutely." He added that people have seen him wearing one before."
(he's referring to masks in case you're wondering).

So either he's lying, or you're wrong. Which one do you think it is?

And if it is a hoax, why would he need to wear one at all? Why do pence and company wear them?

And as if he should be given credit for doing what everyone has been telling him to do all along. He should be held accountable for his deplorably bad handling of this pandemic, and his incompetence and narcissism has cost American lives, never forget that. It's truly a tragedy.
 
HAHAAHAHA
You know from a moment-to-moment basis, when putin's puppet is wearing a mask? lol

"When asked whether he would wear one, the president said: "If I were in a tight situation with people I would, absolutely." He added that people have seen him wearing one before."
(he's referring to masks in case you're wondering).

So either he's lying, or you're wrong. Which one do you think it is?

And if it is a hoax, why would he need to wear one at all? Why do pence and company wear them?

And as if he should be given credit for doing what everyone has been telling him to do all along. He should be held accountable for his deplorably bad handling of this pandemic, and his incompetence and narcissism has cost American lives, never forget that. It's truly a tragedy.
If there are signs posted at the entrance to a building saying masks are mandatory, or a local ordinance mandates their use, are you saying he should not comply with those edicts?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DCandtheUTBand
You said he was 'now wearing a mask'. He isn't. He wore a mask ONCE while visiting sick veterans. That was the smart thing to do, and notice NONE of you sheep here gave him credit for it.

Since then, he hasn't worn a mask. Now I'll ask you the same question: Can you admit that you were wrong about him now wearing a mask?
Just to disprove you again:
"And, sure enough, when asked why he didn’t wear a mask during a factory tour in Michigan, President Trump made clear that one reason was he didn’t want to be seen wearing one.

“I wore one in this back area, but I didn’t want to give the press the pleasure of seeing it,” Trump said when asked by reporters.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/05/21/trumps-reason-not-wearing-mask-sticking-it-media/

So looks like he has worn masks before....or is he lying? OR are you wrong?
 
Just to disprove you again:
"And, sure enough, when asked why he didn’t wear a mask during a factory tour in Michigan, President Trump made clear that one reason was he didn’t want to be seen wearing one.

“I wore one in this back area, but I didn’t want to give the press the pleasure of seeing it,” Trump said when asked by reporters.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/05/21/trumps-reason-not-wearing-mask-sticking-it-media/

So looks like he has worn masks before....or is he lying? OR are you wrong?

I didn't claim he had never wore a mask. I just claimed you were wrong about your claim that he was NOW wearing a mask.

Then I proved my claim with facts.

I win.
 
So if you wear a mask you don’t support Trump and if you don’t wear a mask you support Trump? Do I have that right?
 
Mask stops 5>7 Micron particles, mainly bacteria and dust.
Co-V is a 2>4 Micron virus.
Much like having a screen door in a submarine.... :rolleyes:

So on a scientific level, does wearing a mask keep anyone from getting CoV?
Does a mask cover the wet virus susceptible eyes?
Are sheep going to continue to chew their ignorant idiotic cuds? :cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
Seeing more and more people asking the same common sense question: "If masks save lives, how come people keep dying in areas where they are mandated?"

Dems will have to start running damage control soon in the form of......STUDIES!!!!! They will start paying 'scientists' to write long studies where "we conclude that wearing masks saves lives".

Sheep like @sadgator and @Nolec will then use that as 'evidence' that masks save lives. See if you don't have actual.....evidence.....sheep can be fooled by a study. In their mind a study is the same thing as evidence. Just look at how @BSC911 cites studies as 'evidence' that man-made climate change is real.
 
So sheep were lying when they said "Wearing masks saves lives!"?

Yeah, we already knew that. Now we have data to back it up.

Link? Where is this data? Please back it up like you say you can. Show us these numbers that prove that masks don't save lives. Watching.
 
Link? Where is this data? Please back it up like you say you can. Show us these numbers that prove that masks don't save lives. Watching.

Here you go - https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/19/us/states-face-mask-coronavirus-trnd/index.html

29 states mandate wearing masks in public.

Here's the number of hoax flu cases and deaths for these states - https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/

Every state that mandates wearing a mask is still reporting new hoax flu cases and deaths.

Sheep hoodwinked again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatordad3
Here you go - https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/19/us/states-face-mask-coronavirus-trnd/index.html

29 states mandate wearing masks in public.

Here's the number of hoax flu cases and deaths for these states - https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/

Every state that mandates wearing a mask is still reporting new hoax flu cases and deaths.

Sheep hoodwinked again.


EVERY STATE THAT DOES NOT MANDATE WEARING A MASK IS STILL REPORTING NEW CASES AS WELL.

You have to agree that the shutdown did flatten the curve. You can see and understand then that if you do not come in contact with the virus, you will not get it. That's why the curve flattened with the shutdown.
When states opened up the cases spiked. Anything you can do to minimize contact with enough of the virus to cause infection (viral load), will help your chances. Social distancing and masks are the easiest methods to accomplish that.
 
EVERY STATE THAT DOES NOT MANDATE WEARING A MASK IS STILL REPORTING NEW CASES AS WELL.

You have to agree that the shutdown did flatten the curve. You can see and understand then that if you do not come in contact with the virus, you will not get it. That's why the curve flattened with the shutdown.
When states opened up the cases spiked. Anything you can do to minimize contact with enough of the virus to cause infection (viral load), will help your chances. Social distancing and masks are the easiest methods to accomplish that.

I have no idea what point you are trying to make by saying states that don't mandate mask wearing are still reporting new cases.
 


I mean, some of yall need to start using your God-given brains: If you claim masks save lives, then mandate wearing masks to save lives, and people start wearing masks and STILL DIE WHILE WEARING MASKS....then guess what?

Wearing a mask didn't save their lives. This is common sense, yall.
 
EVERY STATE THAT DOES NOT MANDATE WEARING A MASK IS STILL REPORTING NEW CASES AS WELL.

You have to agree that the shutdown did flatten the curve.
You can see and understand then that if you do not come in contact with the virus, you will not get it. That's why the curve flattened with the shutdown.
When states opened up the cases spiked. Anything you can do to minimize contact with enough of the virus to cause infection (viral load), will help your chances. Social distancing and masks are the easiest methods to accomplish that.

So let's all go live in a cave by ourselves, way away from each other, forever... :rolleyes:
Or we can just do what makes sense and let 'herd immunity' take it's natural course.

Dear Nole-lick: Since both masks and no masks results in cases and deaths,
THAT PROVES THAT MASKS DON'T STOP THE VIRUS OR SAVE LIVES....

Cause & Effect --- The effect of a flattened curve,,,,, DOES NOT PROVE THAT A SHUTDOWN IS THE CAUSE.

Compare 'no shutdown' Sweden to 'shutdown' Belgium for cases and deaths. o_O
 
I have no idea what point you are trying to make by saying states that don't mandate mask wearing are still reporting new cases.
So let's all go live in a cave by ourselves, way away from each other, forever... :rolleyes:
Or we can just do what makes sense and let 'herd immunity' take it's natural course.

Dear Nole-lick: Since both masks and no masks results in cases and deaths,
THAT PROVES THAT MASKS DON'T STOP THE VIRUS OR SAVE LIVES....

Cause & Effect --- The effect of a flattened curve,,,,, DOES NOT PROVE THAT A SHUTDOWN IS THE CAUSE.

Compare 'no shutdown' Sweden to 'shutdown' Belgium for cases and deaths. o_O

I will agree that we're probably best off if you'd go live by yourself in cave, though I suspect you've long been there.
Your totally faulty logic: "Since both .... or save lives" Duh.... According to that flawed logic since people die from heart attack at home and in hospitals.... neither saves lives!!!! See, doesn't work since there are more factors involved.

I'll await your learned opinion ( that differs from any educated person) on why the curve flattened in this country,, if it was NOT the shutdown.

Note that Belgium is the 22nd most densely populated county, at 376 people per sq. Km, compared to Sweden's 22.5 people/ sq. Km. Now compare a geographically proximate county, Finland, with a similar pop. density as Sweden, and though pop. densities are similar, Sweden has more sq. Km and therefore about double the total pop. Sweden total covid deaths = 5500, to Finland less than 400. That no shutdown causes 10x the deaths.
 
I'll await your learned opinion ( that differs from any educated person) on why the curve flattened in this country,, if it was NOT the shutdown.

What impact did hospitals stopping elective surgeries have on capacity?

BTW self-isolation in small groups doesn't work. 66% of cases in NYC came from people who self-isolated.
 
Compare totally shutdown NY City with anywhere you like.... :rolleyes:
Blue states shutdown and still lead the nation in CoV deaths.
1. NY
2. NJ
3, ILL
4. Mass
5 Calif.

BTW, I don't know anyone in my community (or in my extended remote family) that's tested positive or has had CoV. o_O

Nobody in my local (within 20 miles) American Legion, AmVets, VFW, or Fleet Reserve have had it or tested positive for it. o_O

Some business have been shutdown, but masks are not now, nor have they ever been mandatory here. Generally, the old or otherwise susceptible choose to wear masks, but even those are not 100% The only things that are closed down are the places that serve alcohol, mostly bars (idiocy). We still meet at other (private) places, have a beer, and discuss things of importance to us.

Living in a cave is your solution, not mine.
Being an idiot is your fate, not mine. :rolleyes:

Show scientific proof that lock-downs flatten the curves. o_O
(crickets on the way) :oops:
 
Compare totally shutdown NY City with anywhere you like.... :rolleyes:
Blue states shutdown and still lead the nation in CoV deaths.
1. NY
2. NJ
3, ILL
4. Mass
5 Calif.

BTW, I don't know anyone in my community (or in my extended remote family) that's tested positive or has had CoV. o_O

Nobody in my local (within 20 miles) American Legion, AmVets, VFW, or Fleet Reserve have had it or tested positive for it. o_O

Some business have been shutdown, but masks are not now, nor have they ever been mandatory here. Generally, the old or otherwise susceptible choose to wear masks, but even those are not 100% The only things that are closed down are the places that serve alcohol, mostly bars (idiocy). We still meet at other (private) places, have a beer, and discuss things of importance to us.

Living in a cave is your solution, not mine.
Being an idiot is your fate, not mine. :rolleyes:

Show scientific proof that lock-downs flatten the curves. o_O
(crickets on the way) :oops:

As usual , you said compare Sweden to Belgium. I shut your trap on it, so now you move your goalposts.
What impact did hospitals stopping elective surgeries have on capacity?

BTW self-isolation in small groups doesn't work. 66% of cases in NYC came from people who self-isolated.


Already asked you what flattened the curve. Waiting your answer. Watching, waiting. You brought up cave life so I assumed you were happy with your new living quarters, trying to get away from your alien anal probe friends.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT