Senator Rick Scott (There was ALOT of Fraud

[goldmom]

Did you not comprehend what I wrote? It was rather long, and your attention span isn't what it used to be, I get it.

See, you make needless and baseless personal attacks and there goes even more credibility.
What makes me SMH is that you seem to be ignorant or even unaware that the guy you support is in full dementia, yet you don't hesitate to infer that I am the one struggling with my mental acuity.
I'm several years younger than the Delaware Dunce.
Suggest you back off.

 

[jfegaly]

Yes he saw the audit that proved fraud. He doesn't care, he just can't accept that the dems cheat.

It's ok, he doesn't have to believe in order for them to be punished for it.

and he knows he is caught in a corner. Answer no, and he is wrong. Answer yes, he acknowledges there was fraud due to the very thing he has been advocating “count every vote”. He is stuck.

 

[LizardGrad89]

and he knows he is caught in a corner. Answer no, and he is wrong. Answer yes, he acknowledges there was fraud due to the very thing he has been advocating “count every vote”. He is stuck.

There is no machine audit that proves fraud. All such claims have been debunked.

You continue to live in a fantasy world.

 

[jfegaly]

There is no machine audit that proves fraud. All such claims have been debunked.

You continue to live in a fantasy world.

deflection. ANY fraud, yes or no?

 

[LizardGrad89]

and he knows he is caught in a corner. Answer no, and he is wrong. Answer yes, he acknowledges there was fraud due to the very thing he has been advocating “count every vote”. He is stuck.

I keep telling you, the paper ballots printed by Dominion match the machine counts. An audit that shows that Windows 10 isn't fully up to date is a non sequitur. It has absolutely nothing to do with anything. But keep clutching at those straws.

 

[jfegaly]

I keep telling you, the paper ballots printed by Dominion match the machine counts. An audit that shows that Windows 10 isn't fully up to date is a non sequitur. It has absolutely nothing to do with anything. But keep clutching at those straws.

Again. ANY fraud? Yes or no? Pretty simple to answer really. It requires one word

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

There is no machine audit that proves fraud. All such claims have been debunked.

By the people that signed off on using the machines. I don't know if you are really that gullible, but we certainly are not.

 

[LizardGrad89]

deflection. ANY fraud, yes or no?

Deflection. Can you PROVE fraud, yes or no?

Heck, can you even DEFINE fraud? You seem to think a ballot with an unverified signature is proof of fraud. When you know what fraud is, get back to me.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

I keep telling you, the paper ballots printed by Dominion match the machine counts. An audit that shows that Windows 10 isn't fully up to date is a non sequitur. It has absolutely nothing to do with anything. But keep clutching at those straws.

The audit showed that the machine changed vote counts.

 

[jfegaly]

Deflection. Can you PROVE fraud, yes or no?

Heck, can you even DEFINE fraud? You seem to think a ballot with an unverified signature is proof of fraud. When you know what fraud is, get back to me.

i will answer after you. I am guessing you are deflecting because.....you’re stuck

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Deflection. Can you PROVE fraud, yes or no?

Heck, can you even DEFINE fraud? You seem to think a ballot with an unverified signature is proof of fraud. When you know what fraud is, get back to me.

Fraud is intentionally cheating.

The audit revealed that this was done AND was done on a machine designed for that purpose.

It's over, bro. You are just making the fall harder the longer you refuse to accept the truth.

 

[LizardGrad89]

i will answer after you. I am guessing you are deflecting because.....you’re stuck

When you understand elections you will realize that is a strawman argument and pointless question.

The only place I'm stuck is in trying to get you to think. At all. It's proving a Herculean task.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

and he knows he is caught in a corner. Answer no, and he is wrong. Answer yes, he acknowledges there was fraud due to the very thing he has been advocating “count every vote”. He is stuck.

Worse, admitting he is wrong means we are right.

I told him a year ago this would be the last presidential election for the dem party. You should have seen how upset that made him!

He's beginning to see now that I was right. I *never* troll here with my information. I may troll the sheep when I am proven right, but my information is always rock solid.

Keep watching...

 

[jfegaly]

When you understand elections you will realize that is a strawman argument and pointless question.

The only place I'm stuck is in trying to get you to think. At all. It's proving a Herculean task.

its yes or no. and you won’t answer. keep deflecting. #stuck

 

[LizardGrad89]

its yes or no. and you won’t answer. keep deflecting. #stuck

Try as I might to educate you, you insist on remaining ignorant. Shame.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

I keep telling you, the paper ballots printed by Dominion match the machine counts.

Actually, they don't. In the MI audit, they ran the same votes through the machine twice. The second time they switched the software to an earlier version before running the votes.

The votes changed by 60%.

It's over, bro.