ADVERTISEMENT

Senator Rick Scott (There was ALOT of Fraud

Yet the dems on this board know more than someone on the Homeland Security and Government affairs committee. Uhuh

It’s still a tough road for Trump to win this way because even if the congress or senate object to the electoral vote in a particular state, they eventually vote on it. We’ll see who is a RINO or who has balls.
 
It’s still a tough road for Trump to win this way because even if the congress or senate object to the electoral vote in a particular state, they eventually vote on it. We’ll see who is a RINO or who has balls.

agreed. Let’s see how consistent @LizardGrad89 is. I am guessing he will be calling for an investigation any minute now
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
agreed. Let’s see how consistent @LizardGrad89 is. I am guessing he will be calling for an investigation any minute now

An investigation of what? If you are saying Voldemort should be investigated, well, he was, and was found to have defrauded Medicare of millions. But somehow he escaped prosecution. I guess money talks, even money you stole.

If you think I'm going to want an investigation into "election fraud" because this shyster didn't like the outcome of the election, not so much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sadgator
An investigation of what? If you are saying Voldemort should be investigated, well, he was, and was found to have defrauded Medicare of millions. But somehow he escaped prosecution. I guess money talks, even money you stole.

If you think I'm going to want an investigation into "election fraud" because this shyster didn't like the outcome of the election, not so much.

mr irrelevant strikes again, and continues to solidify the nickname. Love it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
So for you, the "path to relevancy" starts with agreeing with your positions?

Sorry, I prefer to be right.

no, it begins with character. You have none. #counteveryillegalvote and now #notsoconsistentafterall #hypocrite
 
LizardGrad89 owns this entire board...Rivals should rename it “Block 89”...seriously, it’s been amazing to watch...

he’s been right on every single point...and yet...well...

funny thing. “Own” or “in someones head” are message board cliches that really equate to....I got no good comeback, so I “own“ you, “I am in your head”. They are the argument of witless children
 
Mo Brooks has said he will challenge the electors on Jan 6th. WIngnut said today he will back him, so there's 2 hours for one state.

Gaetz and Scott will likely tag team on another.

Trump holds all the cards, as always.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: sadgator
I question whether the Dems actually control social media as stated above. I mean, the entire discussion regarding "election fraud evidence" has happened over Twitter. Without Twitter I doubt the "Stop the Steal" movement gets off the ground.
 
Trump holds all the cards, as always.

More like...

Donald-Trump_Card-Joker_Photo.jpg


would you like a pillow cushion for your chair to watch Biden’s inauguration or bean bag?...we’d like to make this as comfortable for you as possible...
 
no. He was right about no fraud? Show me.

Show us there was fraud. And not your twitter or gateway pundit crap. Show us where an investigation by the DOJ or a similar state agency took place and found real fraud. And I don't mean something like meemaw forgot she mailed in a ballot and voted on voting day. Shit happens in every election, and if you knew ANYTHING about elections you would understand this.

And while you are at it, you can try to explain how the Dominion machines managed to massively change the election count, considering that every person who voted on a dominion machine had a hard copy of their ballot printed out which they hand carried to the ballot box, then when the recounts happened, the paper ballots were used in the recount and the counts came out the same?

And then you can explain this massive mail in ballot fraud. Considering that every mail in ballot is entered in to the system the same way the live ballots are entered, which is tied to the voter registration lists, how the Democrats were able to print hundreds of thousands of these ballots overnight when they didn't even know which people had and hadn't voted yet? Remember the details that go into a ballot, son. Every precinct in every county in every state has their own unique ballot, which has their precinct information on there, and any state or local election as it pertains to that specific area. Thousands of potential individual ballot types per state, printed overnight and delivered to the counting halls. And let's not forget that all paper isn't created equal. Paper comes in different weights and brightnesses. To keep the fake ones from looking like obvious fakes, the printer has to have the same paper used in each individual state and/or county, depending on at what level the type of paper to be used was mandated. And then there is the time and motion issue. Even disregarding the time it would take to find out which registered voters didn't vote and could therefore have fake ballots printed, the fastest printers in the world can run off about 150 copies a minute. The claim for Pennsylvania was, what? 400,000 votes? I remember seeing that number. Well, if you had 100 machines running at full blast it would take over 26 hours to print them all. Just to print them. To print any faster than that would require taking over a printing house, and there are only a few of the big printing companies left, it would be easy to investigate those locations. Trump's lawyers would have certainly looked into that option, you know, if they actually believed any of this occurred. So more likely it was done with commercially purchased machines, and back to the 26 hour issue. Which was just for Pennsylvania and not for the other states, so double or maybe triple these numbers for the nation. Weren't they supposed to have been driven in from a remote location as well? Yet the claim was that night the ballots showed up. Tell me, how would that be possible? Let's not forget that this kind of production would leave a trail. Where are the paper companies that sold these huge truckloads of paper to step forward and say they did this? After all, selling paper isn't a crime. It would only take one invoice for a truckload of paper in the correct size, weight and brightness to be all the evidence you would need. Or one invoice for the sale of 100 top of the line copiers, which is also not a crime, so the company would have no issue stepping forward. So where are these invoices? Where are the thousands of people it would take to pull this off? WHERE IS ANYTHING?

My God, it only takes FIVE MINUTES of critical thinking to realize the whole thing is ridiculous. Can't you even use that soup you store in your cranium for 5 minutes for something useful, like thought?
 
  • Like
Reactions: sadgator
Mo Brooks has said he will challenge the electors on Jan 6th. WIngnut said today he will back him, so there's 2 hours for one state.

Gaetz and Scott will likely tag team on another.

Trump holds all the cards, as always.

Wingnut doesn't really narrow it down, they are all wingnuts.
 
Show us there was fraud. And not your twitter or gateway pundit crap. Show us where an investigation by the DOJ or a similar state agency took place and found real fraud. And I don't mean something like meemaw forgot she mailed in a ballot and voted on voting day. Shit happens in every election, and if you knew ANYTHING about elections you would understand this.

And while you are at it, you can try to explain how the Dominion machines managed to massively change the election count, considering that every person who voted on a dominion machine had a hard copy of their ballot printed out which they hand carried to the ballot box, then when the recounts happened, the paper ballots were used in the recount and the counts came out the same?

And then you can explain this massive mail in ballot fraud. Considering that every mail in ballot is entered in to the system the same way the live ballots are entered, which is tied to the voter registration lists, how the Democrats were able to print hundreds of thousands of these ballots overnight when they didn't even know which people had and hadn't voted yet? Remember the details that go into a ballot, son. Every precinct in every county in every state has their own unique ballot, which has their precinct information on there, and any state or local election as it pertains to that specific area. Thousands of potential individual ballot types per state, printed overnight and delivered to the counting halls. And let's not forget that all paper isn't created equal. Paper comes in different weights and brightnesses. To keep the fake ones from looking like obvious fakes, the printer has to have the same paper used in each individual state and/or county, depending on at what level the type of paper to be used was mandated. And then there is the time and motion issue. Even disregarding the time it would take to find out which registered voters didn't vote and could therefore have fake ballots printed, the fastest printers in the world can run off about 150 copies a minute. The claim for Pennsylvania was, what? 400,000 votes? I remember seeing that number. Well, if you had 100 machines running at full blast it would take over 26 hours to print them all. Just to print them. To print any faster than that would require taking over a printing house, and there are only a few of the big printing companies left, it would be easy to investigate those locations. Trump's lawyers would have certainly looked into that option, you know, if they actually believed any of this occurred. So more likely it was done with commercially purchased machines, and back to the 26 hour issue. Which was just for Pennsylvania and not for the other states, so double or maybe triple these numbers for the nation. Weren't they supposed to have been driven in from a remote location as well? Yet the claim was that night the ballots showed up. Tell me, how would that be possible? Let's not forget that this kind of production would leave a trail. Where are the paper companies that sold these huge truckloads of paper to step forward and say they did this? After all, selling paper isn't a crime. It would only take one invoice for a truckload of paper in the correct size, weight and brightness to be all the evidence you would need. Or one invoice for the sale of 100 top of the line copiers, which is also not a crime, so the company would have no issue stepping forward. So where are these invoices? Where are the thousands of people it would take to pull this off? WHERE IS ANYTHING?

My God, it only takes FIVE MINUTES of critical thinking to realize the whole thing is ridiculous. Can't you even use that soup you store in your cranium for 5 minutes for something useful, like thought?

so are you saying NO fraud? Simple yes or no will do

seems like your goalposts have moved quite a bit. DOJ or state agency huh....Mr irrelevant strikes again
 
Interesting. When asked a simple yes or no question about ANY election fraud. @LizardGrad89 goes radio silent. See, you didn’t have to re-type the Old Testament to settle this. Just a simple yes or no would have sufficed. My guess is, you would end up in the same situation you did when you made a choice between count every vote and count every legal vote. Quite the dilemma I am sure for someone who takes no issue with illegal voting.

Tough corner to get of for sure. Good luck

edit: hastag “owned”. Hashtag “in your head.“.
 
Last edited:
You can’t “prove” a negative. However, State certified results are conclusive and we do have that, for each and every state “in question. No other credible evidence has been presented (well unless you count drunk chicks and farts as “evidence”). No fraud.

Can’t wait to see all of us patriots cheering together for America’s success on Biden’s Inauguration Day. It is going to be glorious!
 
You can’t “prove” a negative. However, State certified results are conclusive and we do have that, for each and every state “in question. No other credible evidence has been presented (well unless you count drunk chicks and farts as “evidence”). No fraud.

Can’t wait to see all of us patriots cheering together for America’s success on Biden’s Inauguration Day. It is going to be glorious!

so you are willing to say ZERO fraud?
 
Interesting. When asked a simple yes or no question about ANY election fraud. @LizardGrad89 goes radio silent. See, you didn’t have to re-type the Old Testament to settle this. Just a simple yes or no would have sufficed. My guess is, you would end up in the same situation you did when you made a choice between count every vote and count every legal vote. Quite the dilemma I am sure for someone who takes no issue with illegal voting.

Tough corner to get of for sure. Good luck

edit: hastag “owned”. Hashtag “in your head.“.

Yes he saw the audit that proved fraud. He doesn't care, he just can't accept that the dems cheat.

It's ok, he doesn't have to believe in order for them to be punished for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
so are you saying NO fraud? Simple yes or no will do

seems like your goalposts have moved quite a bit. DOJ or state agency huh....Mr irrelevant strikes again

Not playing your strawman game any longer.

When you have a clue about how any of this works, come back.
 
Show us there was fraud. And not your twitter or gateway pundit crap. Show us where an investigation by the DOJ or a similar state agency took place and found real fraud. And I don't mean something like meemaw forgot she mailed in a ballot and voted on voting day. Shit happens in every election, and if you knew ANYTHING about elections you would understand this.

And while you are at it, you can try to explain how the Dominion machines managed to massively change the election count, considering that every person who voted on a dominion machine had a hard copy of their ballot printed out which they hand carried to the ballot box, then when the recounts happened, the paper ballots were used in the recount and the counts came out the same?

And then you can explain this massive mail in ballot fraud. Considering that every mail in ballot is entered in to the system the same way the live ballots are entered, which is tied to the voter registration lists, how the Democrats were able to print hundreds of thousands of these ballots overnight when they didn't even know which people had and hadn't voted yet? Remember the details that go into a ballot, son. Every precinct in every county in every state has their own unique ballot, which has their precinct information on there, and any state or local election as it pertains to that specific area. Thousands of potential individual ballot types per state, printed overnight and delivered to the counting halls. And let's not forget that all paper isn't created equal. Paper comes in different weights and brightnesses. To keep the fake ones from looking like obvious fakes, the printer has to have the same paper used in each individual state and/or county, depending on at what level the type of paper to be used was mandated. And then there is the time and motion issue. Even disregarding the time it would take to find out which registered voters didn't vote and could therefore have fake ballots printed, the fastest printers in the world can run off about 150 copies a minute. The claim for Pennsylvania was, what? 400,000 votes? I remember seeing that number. Well, if you had 100 machines running at full blast it would take over 26 hours to print them all. Just to print them. To print any faster than that would require taking over a printing house, and there are only a few of the big printing companies left, it would be easy to investigate those locations. Trump's lawyers would have certainly looked into that option, you know, if they actually believed any of this occurred. So more likely it was done with commercially purchased machines, and back to the 26 hour issue. Which was just for Pennsylvania and not for the other states, so double or maybe triple these numbers for the nation. Weren't they supposed to have been driven in from a remote location as well? Yet the claim was that night the ballots showed up. Tell me, how would that be possible? Let's not forget that this kind of production would leave a trail. Where are the paper companies that sold these huge truckloads of paper to step forward and say they did this? After all, selling paper isn't a crime. It would only take one invoice for a truckload of paper in the correct size, weight and brightness to be all the evidence you would need. Or one invoice for the sale of 100 top of the line copiers, which is also not a crime, so the company would have no issue stepping forward. So where are these invoices? Where are the thousands of people it would take to pull this off? WHERE IS ANYTHING?

My God, it only takes FIVE MINUTES of critical thinking to realize the whole thing is ridiculous. Can't you even use that soup you store in your cranium for 5 minutes for something useful, like thought?
You were on a roll. Then you inferred you had actually done 5 minutes worth of "critical thinking" at the end...
 
You were on a roll. Then you inferred you had actually done 5 minutes worth of "critical thinking" at the end...

Did you not comprehend what I wrote? It was rather long, and your attention span isn't what it used to be, I get it.
 
LizardGrad89 owns this entire board...Rivals should rename it “Block 89”...seriously, it’s been amazing to watch...

he’s been right on every single point...and yet...well...

Not so much. What's really been amazing has been watching this crew push illogical arguments, imaginary evidence, and anonymous twitter posts as proof of election fraud.

It's like playing basketball against people who insist on tying their feet together. I'm not much of a basketball player, but I can run rings around a bunch of people lying on the ground.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT