ADVERTISEMENT

Regarding Coronavirus

gator1776

Ring of Honor
Gold Member
Jan 19, 2011
44,588
80,081
113
So most on here have seen the report I produced on COVID back in October. I will post it again with some updated numbers. The mortality rate continues to decline, and if you take those under 50 with no risk factors, your mortality rate falls to roughly 0.02%.

Current numbers:
Where things stand as of today:

Worldwide Cases: 69,951,283
Global Deaths: 1,534,537
Global Mortality Rate given Known Cases: 2.1%
This represents a reduction in mortality rate of roughly 2.1% since July 19, 2020

US Confirmed Cases: 14,728,508
US Deaths: 282,198
US Mortality Rate given Known Cases: 1.9%
This represents a reduction in mortality rate of 1.85% since July 19, 2020

A reasonable estimate of the number of unknown cases is at least double the number of known cases, and possibly much higher. The reason for this is that a large number of people that are "exposed" to COVID 19 and "catch" COVID 19 either never have symptoms or have very mild symptoms and do not get tested. If we use double the number of known cases (which is a very conservative estimate) then the mortality rates change:
Global Mortality Rate: 1.1%
US Mortality Rate: 0.9%

What follows is the full report..........IT IS MY OPINION THAT COVID, WHILE REAL, AIN'T ALL THAT BAD AND IS BEING USED BY THE FEW TO CONTROL THE MANY THROUGH FEAR.

I also found this funny............in a sad sort of way............

130482531_3641565292569228_1691892591753506714_n.jpg
 
THIS WAS MEANT ONLY AS A SUMMARY OF MY PERSONAL EXPERIENCES, I DO NOT REPRESENT ANYONE ELSE BUT MYSELF IN THIS REPORT. I PRESENT TO HOPEFULLY BE HELPFUL TO THE LAY PUBLIC AND I REMIND EVERYONE TO FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE LOCAL AND STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENTS AND THE CDC.



Coronavirus, a summary of my experiences, thoughts, and putting the pandemic in context.


First my credentials for those unfamiliar: I am board certified by the ABIM and ABMS in Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Medicine, Critical Care Medicine, and Hospice and Palliative Care Medicine. I am also board certified in Pediatrics by the American Board of Pediatrics. I work mostly as a Pulmonary and Critical Care doctor and I am or have been the medical director or co-medical director of two different hospital’s intensive care units during the entire COVID 19 pandemic. I have personally cared for hundreds of infected coronavirus patients ranging in severity from mild hospital cases to severe ICU cases on life support, many of whom sadly did not survive. I offer this information as a matter of personal opinion and experience. It is in no way meant to be personal medical advice and if you think you are infected you should seek treatment from your local physician immediately.

Where things stand as of today:

Worldwide Cases: 69,951,283
Global Deaths: 1,534,537
Global Mortality Rate given Known Cases: 2.1%
This represents a reduction in mortality rate of roughly 2.1% since July 19, 2020

US Confirmed Cases: 14,728,508
US Deaths: 282,198
US Mortality Rate given Known Cases: 1.9%
This represents a reduction in mortality rate of 1.85% since July 19, 2020

A reasonable estimate of the number of unknown cases is at least double the number of known cases, and possibly much higher. The reason for this is that a large number of people that are "exposed" to COVID 19 and "catch" COVID 19 either never have symptoms or have very mild symptoms and do not get tested. If we use double the number of known cases (which is a very conservative estimate) then the mortality rates change:
Global Mortality Rate: 1.1%
US Mortality Rate: 0.9%

I want to point out I’m not talking about the number of coronavirus cases. There will be surges in the number of coronavirus cases. The key thing to watch is the mortality rate.

So why has the mortality rate gone down? The answer lies in several dynamics in this case:
A) Improved Treatments
B) Reduced Viral Virulence
C) Group Immunity (intentionally avoiding the phrase "Herd Immunity" which is used incorrectly by the media)
D) Improved Testing

Let’s explore this some more.

My current treatment approach:


1) Asymptomatic positive: Nothing.

2) Mildly symptomatic positive with no respiratory symptoms: Supportive care (Tylenol, Hydrate, Chicken Soup, Rest).

3) Symptomatic with respiratory symptoms w/o hypoxemia: Supportive care plus Zithromax and Steroids (Dexamethasone or Prednisone).

4) Symptomatic with respiratory symptoms with hypoxemia and chest-Xray changes: Admit to hospital, convalescent plasma (IgG antibody to COVID from donors), Remdesivir, High Dose Dexamethasone, and the Vitamins (Zinc, MVI, possible Vit D).

5) Severely Symptomatic with Respiratory Failure: Everything listed under 4 plus high flow oxygen first, then BiPAP if need. Self-prone position as much as possible. Avoid intubation and positive pressure ventilation if at all possible. If intubated and ventilated, adopt ARDS treatment protocols and/or Airway Pressure Release Ventilation and prone 18 hours a day. Heavy sedation when on vent, often with addition of paralytic agent.

***All hospitalized patient should be put on double the standard dose of anticoagulation for DVT prevention as these patients do tend to be hypercoagulable***
Patient with risk factors may be bumped up a number depending on presentation.

**Risk Factors can be divided into one of five categories in order of importance in my experience: Age, Morbid Obesity, Diabetes, COPD, other comorbidities.
 
A) Improved Treatments.

Key in treatment is early recognition of those with hypoxemia and Xray change and quick treatment with plasma, anti-viral (Remdesivir), and high-dose steroids. In my experience and in the experience of my colleges, the early treatment with this combination really does seem to save lives. Prior to these therapies and back when COVID 19 first started, it was not unusual for me to have 10-12 ICU patients with COVID 19 on the ventilator. These days, for the last 2 months, I have averaged about 3 ventilated COVID 19 patients a week. That represents a tremendous improvement. Keeping the patient off the vent is key. If you don't go on the vent, you have a substantially higher survival rate. If you do go on the vent you have a 55-60% "survival" rate nationally. This mirrors my experience. I caution that "survival" simply means survival to discharge, but it doesn't quantify what shape you may be in at discharge.

How does this combination therapy work? Why is it such a game changer?

When you get COVID 19 infection your body has a natural immune response to the infection. In a small percentage of people, the immune system is hyper-responsive and attacks not just the virus but also the human body, most frequently in COVID, the lungs. This leads to Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) which causes the Respiratory Failure through shunt physiology in the lung. This leads to severe hypoxemia (low oxygen levels) and eventual scaring of the lung. At its fullest expression, this leads to death due to suffocation.

So, the COVID IgG antibody, either from plasma from donors who have recovered from COVID or the new monoclonal IgG COVID AB soon to be on the market (the one the president received), binds to the Coronavirus preventing it or killing it before it infects more airway and lung cells thus preventing infection and the potential hyper-immune response. The more IgG AB you have to COVID, the less virus is left to worsen the infection. The anti-viral Remdesivir kills the Coronavirus that infects your body thereby reducing the number of virions left alive, something in medicine referred to as lowering your viral load. How well Remdesivir works remains unproven. The high dose Dexamethasone reduces your immune response (which is what Plaquenil does as well in theory, but not as effectively as steroids).

So, in summation, after exposure and infection, if you are treated with this "cocktail," the IgG binds to much of the Coronavirus in your body rendering it less infectious and eventually killing the virus. Most of the small percentage of virus that eludes the IgG will likely be killed by the Remdesivir. If there is still enough virus left (live or dead) to cause a hyper-immune response in the susceptible population, the dexamethasone greatly reduces the immune response. This combination seems extremely effective if given early. If given too late in the course (when they are already near 100% oxygen requirements or on the vent) it is seldom effective and often too late.

B) Reduced Viral Virulence.

Reduced viral virulence is the natural evolution of every viral plague or bacterial plague throughout history.
The purpose of a virus is to reproduce its genetic code, which is an RNA code in this case. Therefore, it serves no purpose for the virus to kill its host which it is using to reproduce its genetic code to then be released by millions of viral particles through the host. The host in this case being us. If a virus mutates in such a way that it becomes more virulent, and kills off its host, then less of that virus is replicated and released. Those mutations therefore die out. The mutations that allow the virus to replicate with little-to-no damage to the host are replicated and released in much higher numbers and win out over time. This is a key reason why, historically, most viral and bacterial "plagues" weaken over time and you see a generally predicable decline in mortality rate within the first few years. There is no reason to suspect that COVID 19 will be any different, and we are—indeed—seeing lowering mortality rates. The key here is to realize the mortality rates are declining not just in the US (where we have all these amazing treatments at our fingertips as doctors) but also around the world, including many countries with little access to quality healthcare.

If you want further proof of how super-virulent viruses die out before they spread, well, ever wonder why all Ebola outbreaks are very time limited and geographically limited? They kill off the host too fast and at too high a percentage to spread.

C) Group Immunity.

Too much has been made of the term "herd immunity." It is being applied incorrectly here as it is not herd immunity that is lowering the mortality rate. Herd immunity usually refers to immunoglobulin immunity, which requires specific antibodies, which develop only after specific exposure to the infection or through immunization. In theory, once you reach a critical threshold for number of people in a society with immunoglobulins to the virus, you have reached "herd immunity." In that state, usually around 50-70% of the herd with IgG antibodies to COVID, less people can get infected, there are fewer host, and therefore the viral numbers drop because less virus is replicated which, in turn, protects the part of the herd that may not have enough IgG antibodies. But this is just one way in which a herd can show immunity or, more so in my meaning, protection from a viral infection.

In understanding this, I prefer the term “group immunity” because it allows for inclusion of all aspects of the human immune response, not just immunoglobulins. The human immune system has a vast armamentarium of weapons to fight invaders of which immunoglobulins are just one branch. The human immune system fights infections with numerous types of cells and other components including T-cells, B-cells, Natural Killer Cells, Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes (basophils, eosinophils, neutrophils), Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Cytokines, and the Complement System. It is through the combination of all of these responses that we attack and kill invaders to our body. In addition, the largest defense we have against invaders—the largest organ of our body—is the skin. It is my contention as a doctor that both the US and the World is developing a group immunity to COVID (or already had one to some extent), making us less susceptible to catching the virus and/or allowing us to fend it off better if we do catch it. Eventually, after enough have been exposed or vaccinated when available, there will then also be a more classic "herd immunity" at least temporarily for however long the IgG to COVID 19 is being produced by the herd (unknown at present).

It is also my contention that this group immunity did not just develop this year but was somewhat already in place. How is that possible? Because COVID 19 is not the first coronavirus to which our bodies have been exposed. Coronavirus as a cause for upper respiratory tract infection (URI, aka cold virus), has been around for a hundred years having first been discovered in the 1920s. There are several types of coronaviruses including, but not limited to, several common cold viruses, MERS, SARS, and COVID 19 (aka SARS2). As a species on this planet, Homo Sapiens Sapiens (aka humans) have been exposed to coronaviruses for a minimum of 100 years and likely for several thousands of years. As such, our body, in particular our immune system, has already evolved to be less susceptible to coronaviruses as a mechanism of survival and natural selection. So when a novel strain of coronavirus comes along, such a SARS and SARS2 (aka COVID 19) our bodies already are familiar enough with the new strain to prevent most of us from either catching it or catching a severe case of the new virus as a function of our combined immune system, not just antibodies. This is why most that are infected with COVID 19 get common cold like symptoms and nothing more. Occasionally, as with many URI viruses, more susceptible humans develop a viral pneumonia or a deeper infection termed a lower respiratory infection (LRI) which can be far more serious and can lead to hyper-immune responses, ARDS, and even death. Over time, through natural selection, the more susceptible Homo Sapiens Sapiens die off, the group immunity improves, and the virus becomes less virulent.

Much has been made of the phrase "common cold." Many have taken exception to referring to COVID as a "common cold virus." The definition of a common cold is a viral infection of the upper respiratory system, including the nose, throat, sinuses, eustachian tubes, trachea, larynx, and bronchial tubes. There are over 200 types of common cold viruses using this definition with rhinoviruses making up the majority. Almost all cold viruses clear up in less than two weeks with minimal complications. Many of these URI viruses can, on occasion, lead to LRI and viral pneumonias, which often get misdiagnoses as bacterial pneumonias and are, therefore, under reported. Some are more likely to lead to LRIs—such as COVID 19—but COVID 19 is a URI of which the vast majority of people that "catch" COVID 19 get either no symptoms or only mild "cold-like" symptoms. So—and really this is all semantics—does that not make COVID 19 just another version of the other Coronaviruses that cause a "cold," albeit a nastier version? Your response to this question is often more a reflection of your politics than a reflection of the medical facts.
 
D) Improved Testing.

This is a simple concept. Over the last 6 months we have greatly improved our ability to test people for infection with COVID 19. As such, we no longer reserve the test to hospitals for use on more symptomatic patients. Pretty much anyone in the US can get a COVID test if they want one. We also screen asymptomatic people in many settings, such as college football players, on a weekly or bi-weekly or even more frequent schedule. As such, we are diagnosing far more people with mild-to-asymptomatic cases of COVID that would not have been tested back in March or April. This gives us a better understanding of the actual spread and epidemiology of the infection. As such, the number of COVID 19 cases has gone up while the hospitalization rate and mortality rate has gone down indicative of the fact that we are diagnosing a much higher number of mild cases. If there is a big enough surge in new COVID cases in a certain area, the hospitalization rate may temporarily go up, but the mortality rate will continue to decline unless we outstrip our resources. Mortality rate and absolute bed availability should be the only numbers watched in regard to need for any further shutdowns.

In summation, COVID 19 is weakening and our ability to test for it, understand it, and fight it has improved exponentially since March of this year. The virus weakening in a viral pandemic is predictable and consistent with our historical experience with viral pandemics. What needs to be applauded is our nation’s response to this pandemic. Keeping politics out of this, in the history of medicine I have never heard or seen the development of so many weapons—so fast—to fight a new disease. It's unheard of. Within the course of less than 6 months we have gone from having basically nothing to stop this virus in its extreme form to having a literal armamentarium of medicines that, when used early and properly, has an amazing effect on the survivability of this disease. This cannot be understated. This is a new blueprint developed by Western Medicine lead by the United States on how to respond to a new global pandemic. We should be extremely proud to be Americans in this regard. Our researchers, drug companies, doctors (excluding myself) and nurses should be recognized as heroes on the highest of levels. What they have done, the speed with which they have responded, the achievements for which they are responsible, the tools they have given us to fight this virus, and the lives they have saved can never be underestimated.

____________________________________________________________

Regarding the outbreak amongst the Florida and Ole Miss football teams:
It was inevitable. COVID 19 is an Upper Respiratory Infection (URI) or a "cold" virus. Cold viruses are highly infectious. Since they were not living in a bubble, something I do not advocate in the first place, it was inevitable that there would be a "COVID outbreak" in the SEC.

Some key things to understand here: Age is by far the biggest risk factor. According to the CDC website updated 10/14/2020, the total number of deaths from COVID 19 in the United States in the age range of 15-24 is 374. So, in the age range of most college athletes, the mortality rate of COVID 19 is 0.004% (374).

By way of comparison, your risk of dying in an automobile crash in the age range of 15-24 is 0.005%. Aside from scooters at Florida, I have not heard of a plan to shut down colleges and college sports due to driving cars..............

In addition, young people tend to almost always get a milder case or no symptoms at all from COVID infection. I have not heard that any of the players that have tested positive of being symptomatic and have certainly not heard of any of them needing to seek medical care for their infection outside the confines of the team medical staff. This would be consistent with the reality that most kids don't get very sick from this infection.

This is why it was relatively very safe to play college sports this fall and this year and why the mass hysteria and fear over kids of all ages going back to school was overblown and not based in scientific fact. Far more damage is done to our nation, our colleges, our students and our kids by denying them access to schools, school food programs, and normal socialization than would ever be done by Coronavirus. The numbers don't lie.

In summary, while a nuisance, thankfully there is very little risk of any of our players or college athletes around the nation of dying or even getting a severe case of this version of the cold virus.

____________________________________________________________



History of Plagues

Some on here have taken exception to my description of this COVID 19 pandemic as being "wonderfully mild." While I admit I use that intentionally as a hyperbolic phrase, it is based in historical fact. Some context here would help. I have spent a career training for the inevitable pandemic we all knew was coming. Why inevitable, because historically there is a major pandemic of some sort every 50-100 years. The last major pandemic in terms of death rate was the 1918 Influenza pandemic.

Most thought it would be an influenza virus mutation again. The last three "pandemics" have been influenza viruses. Instead, it turned out to be a new strain of coronavirus. We were taught to fear this coming pandemic because of the risk it might outstrip our resources (ventilators, ICU beds, Hospital beds, Medicines, Doctors, Nurses) leading to millions of deaths in under a year. We were told as doctors we would have to triage resources and have to pick who would live and die at the doors of our hospitals. No doctor ever wants to send someone home to die whom we might have been able to save because we don't have the resources to help them. The very thought of that is one I have had to prepare to face a few times in my life as a Marine Corp battalion surgeon and a Pulmonary/Critical Care physician. Thankfully, wonderfully, I have not had to follow through on mass casualty triage (yet). COVID 19 never pushed us that far and has, by historical comparison and what we prepared for as Pulmonary doctors, been a wonderfully mild pandemic. And I hope and pray to God that continues, which, as of now, there is every indication that trend of a wonderfully mild pandemic will continue.

This does not mean I am making light of this real public health threat, or that I lack empathy for those that died from COVID, it just means I have a much better perspective than what has been fed to America by an irrational fear-mongering media in a feeding frenzy of fear and negativity. So why use the hyperbolic phrase "wonderfully mild pandemic?" To make people think and challenge what we are being told. If anyone truly thinks I lack empathy, I will share that the image of having to do one-handed chest compressions while ambu-bag mask ventilating a rare under-30 COVID patient, otherwise perfectly healthy, from the head of the bed—who eventually died that day from COVID 19-related vasculitis—is one of the images from my career that will haunt my memories forever.

So, quickly, by the numbers for perspective, the following is a list of famous pandemics and epidemics through history (keep in mind regarding these numbers that the world’s population is anywhere from 3 times to 1000 times bigger now than during these plagues):

-Influenza of 1918 killed 100 million people world-wide, most in 1918. That reflects a mortality rate of 5.5% of the world’s population in roughly one year.

-Smallpox is estimated to have killed anywhere from 10 million to 100 million or 90% of the indigenous population in the Western Hemisphere between 1492 and 1525 leading to the collapse of both the Aztec and Inca Empires as well as the Mississippian culture of the Central and Eastern United States (exact population numbers of indigenous population are unknown).

-Cocoliztli epidemic was a form of enteric hemorrhagic fever that killed 15 million inhabitants of Mexico and Central America between 1545 and 1548 and was felt to be due to Salmonella paratyphi C.

-The Black Death, caused by Yersinia pestis, killed 100-130 million people between 1346-1353, or roughly 1/3 to 1/2 of the world population at the time. A mortality rate of approximately 32%

-The Antonie Plague AD 165-180 killed 5 million people in the Roman Empire and lead to the destabilization of the Empire itself and marked the beginning of its decline. It was likely a smallpox plague. That reflects a mortality rate of 2.6% of the estimated world’s population.

-COVID 19 numbers to date show a worldwide mortality of 1,088,804 or roughly 0.01% of the world’s population.

I could go on and on, but when you compare both the raw numbers and the numbers as a percentage of total world population at the time of the different plagues, there is little doubt that our current COVID pandemic pales in comparison both in raw numbers and certainly as a percentage of world population, thus making it, thankfully, a wonderfully mild pandemic to date.

____________________________________________________
 
Shutting down the nation.

The cure should never be worse than the disease.
Once it was clear that we would not outstrip our resources, the concept of shutting down our nation and hiding in our houses was not just no longer necessary, it became a bad idea. It was clear by mid-to-late April that continuing the shutdown was unnecessary and potentially far more dangerous to the health of our nation. Through the loss of jobs, insurance, reduced access to health care, impact on our mental health, lack of normal socialization through in-class education for our kids, lack of school lunch programs, and the havoc caused by the continued shutdown on our economy, it was clearly evident that we were going to hurt and kill far more people by shutting down our nation than COVID was ever going to kill. So, while the shutdown the first 3-4 weeks made sense and was reasonable until we knew what we were dealing with, continuing the shutdown after we realized that we were not going to outstrip our medical resources became growingly unreasonable and more harmful than the virus. It is now clear to not just economists but to an ever-growing number of physicians, epidemiologists and public health experts that prolonged shutdowns do far more harm to our public health than benefit in the setting of COVID. It doesn't even prevent the spread of COVID as clearly evidenced over the last 6 months, it only delays its spread. To delay its spread at the expense of the economy and the health of our nation is irrational and pointless. It is only a useful tool on those rare occasions when the number of severely infected patients outstrips our resources which should be handled locally and regionally (such as in NYC in March/April), not nationally, and would appear to be, thankfully, mostly unnecessary.

So, please, for God's sake, local and state governments, stop shutting everything down and stop spreading fear. Go back to life, practice good hygiene, and realize the odds of you catching and dying from COVID are roughly 0.01% in your lifetime as of today. OH, and the news agencies and some of our federal government bureaucracies need to stop the fear mongering as well.

____________________________________________________________

MASKS

This is a very controversial topic with a ton of misinformation out there. It doesn't help when the director of the CDC goes on national television and completely gets it wrong on how masks work by holding up a surgical mask and saying it "protects you from COVID." I'm sure this was not his intention to convey misinformation, allow me to clarify.

So, in short, the only mask type that protects you from getting COVID from someone else is the N95 when worn correctly.

The surgical masks when worn correctly prevent you from spreading COVID to others but does not protect you from getting COVID, though it might reduce the viral load of the initial infection in theory.


All other "masks" that you guys are buying and "wearing" are all much less effective in preventing you from spreading COVID and offer you little-to-no protection from getting COVID 19. A mask worn with your nose exposed is pointless, though cute.

DO MASKS WORK

Well, in theory, if we all had surgical masks and we all wore them correctly at all times, yes. It probably reduces the spread of COVID 19 some or reduces the viral load if you are infected, but not 100% and likely not as much as some would want you to believe. The fact that Europe is having a large outbreak of COVID 19 despite all the mask mandates you have in many European countries is further proof that, as an exercise, getting millions of people to wear the correct mask and wear it correctly is problematic.

As a doctor, I recommend you follow your local and state recommendations, and the CDC recommendations on the wearing of masks, but I don't find them very effective as a preventative measure because it is impossible to get millions of people to wear the right mask the right way all the time especially in a country that values freedom and liberty over safety. Is it possible and therefore more effective in a nation like China, yes, but do I fear COVID enough to want to adopt a Chinese form of government to enforce mask wearing, no. As for me I say, give me liberty, or give me death. That said, as a good citizen that wants to protect my fellow citizens, I voluntarily follow the guidelines and wear the correct mask in the correct way whenever I am out in public within 6 feet of other people.

As always, I continue to urge hand washing, covering your mouth when you sneeze or cough, carrying hand sanitizer, and social distancing when reasonable. As symptomatic people are far more likely to spread the virus than asymptomatic people, I urge you that if you have cold like symptoms stay home and isolate yourself and rest for a few days, unless you need medical attention. As a voter, I don't find masks to be an effective preventative strategy for reasons stated above.

To the director of the CDC I say, with respect, working vaccines are better than masks and will be 1,000 times more effective in preventing the spread than the mask, especially since you misspoke on how the mask works to prevent the spread of the disease.

_________________________________

Vaccine: Take it when available, still think we will have one by the end of 2020 or beginning of 2021, which will still be a record pace.

__________________________

THIS WAS MEANT ONLY AS A SUMMARY OF MY PERSONAL EXPERIENCES, I DO NOT REPRESENT ANYONE ELSE BUT MYSELF IN THIS REPORT. I PRESENT TO HOPEFULLY BE HELPFUL TO THE LAY PUBLIC AND I REMIND EVERYONE TO FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE LOCAL AND STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENTS AND THE CDC.
 
Apologies to @GhostOfMatchesMalone who I am sure is a much more knowledgeable expert on viral respiratory tract infections than me, I'm only a Pulmonary and Critical Care doctor, I'm of course not in his league.

:)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DCandtheUTBand
I just keep taking my elderberry juice bottled with 100 proof vodka every morning. (I grow elderberries) with zinc and B-12. I am outside most of the day so I leave the D alone even though it is in the house.
@BSC911 is going be upset that you don't like the D
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT