Maybe because it doesn't speak about it at all, either way, that men with agendas have purposely mistranslated it to say things it actually does not say, in order to meet personal or political ends? Just a thought.
Sigh. Why post falsehoods? @NavigatorII has already posted multiple verses that mention homosexuality.
Imagine being so ignorant. I found a site that is appropriate for you. 🤣
Imagine being so ignorant. I found a site that is appropriate for you. 🤣
Flanking maneuver Facts for Kids - Kids encyclopedia facts
https://kids.kiddle.co › Flanking_maneuver
In military tactics, a flanking maneuver (also called a flank attack), is an attack on the sides or rear of an opposing force. If a flanking maneuver succeeds, the ...
I bolded your favorite position for attack.
Um, no, jackass.Imagine being so ignorant. I found a site that is appropriate for you. 🤣
Flanking maneuver Facts for Kids - Kids encyclopedia facts
https://kids.kiddle.co › Flanking_maneuver
In military tactics, a flanking maneuver (also called a flank attack), is an attack on the sides or rear of an opposing force. If a flanking maneuver succeeds, the ...
I bolded your favorite position for attack.
You are so desperate for a win here that it's sadly hilarious.
Again, imagine being so ignorant. A general you'll never be. 🤣
Stationed wide. As in, to the side of the formation. You know, flanked.Flanker: Noun
flank·er | \ ˈflaŋ-kər \
a football player stationed wide of the formation slightly behind the line of scrimmage as a pass receiver.
You literally posted that flanks are sides. Thank you for posting about how I am correct, and you are not.Again, imagine being so ignorant. A general you'll never be. 🤣
The flank movement is an offensive military tactic that seeks to circumvent the wings of the enemy positions attacking its flanks (sides) or the rear.
Flanking Maneuver
The flank movement is an offensive military tactic that seeks to circumvent the wings of the enemy positions attacking its flanks (sides) or the rear. Some of the possibilities offered by flank movement are: avoid the enemy's main defenses. opportunity to concentrate their forces only on the...military.wikia.org
I'm going to have to agree with this. Both the Panther and Hammerhead maneuvers involve a base element and a flanking element. I.e. Hammerhead right.You literally posted that flanks are sides. Thank you for posting about how I am correct, and you are not.
By the way, that website is incorrect. If you run a flanking maneuver, you swing wide and attack from the sides. To close in behind is to encircle your opponent. An encirclement maneuver comes after the flanking maneuver and is a separate strategy.
Spolier alert: You aren't getting laid tonight.You literally posted that flanks are sides. Thank you for posting about how I am correct, and you are not.
By the way, that website is incorrect. If you run a flanking maneuver, you swing wide and attack from the sides. To close in behind is to encircle your opponent. An encirclement maneuver comes after the flanking maneuver and is a separate strategy.
Nein. Flanking is every direction but a head on assault. Military.wiki sends you his regrets. Take the big L and move on, retreat.You literally posted that flanks are sides. Thank you for posting about how I am correct, and you are not.
By the way, that website is incorrect. If you run a flanking maneuver, you swing wide and attack from the sides. To close in behind is to encircle your opponent. An encirclement maneuver comes after the flanking maneuver and is a separate strategy.
Just like you took the gay advocacy group's word over the Bible.
Having an open border that then generates all the evil that is going on right now on our southern border is just plain wrong. I don't see how you can condone this but please go ahead. Most of my fellow Americana are good people and they are soon going to wake up and see you Democrats for the evil you and your party produce and vote you out of power.
@LizardGrad89 is too stupid to see that he's saying that anyone that lives in a gated (walled) community is evil as the people of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Wikipedia makes no mention of a maneuver from the rear being included in the definition of flanking. A classic flanking maneuver has always been a surprise ambush from one or both sides.
And to think this argument came from Navi making a poorly executed and unfunny joke about homosexuality.Wikipedia makes no mention of a maneuver from the rear being included in the definition of flanking. A classic flanking maneuver has always been a surprise ambush from one or both sides.
Flanking maneuver - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Homosexuality is a sin and @NavigatorII took @LizardGrad89 to school on flanking.
You are still our ranking village idiot. Stay entrenched in your position of fail. This is why Lincoln relieved McClellan (little Napoleon) of his command,,,,,,,,,he never learned about protecting against his "rear flank", and was forever paralyzed from moving forward.
OR rear....
Oh for two there bud, but thanks for stopping by. No day is complete until you've made a fool of yourself. Again.
I owned you on flanking, sorry there bub. Hope I didn't put too much of a hurt on that "rear flank" of yours. 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
You calling anyone else this is just ridiculously funny.
Here is what the DoD has to say about envelopments and flanks, note that they separate flanks and rear, because they aren't the same thing. 🤣
But how would you get there? Especially in ancient warfare? It wasn't til the concept of vertical envelopment was introduced that you could show up behind enemy lines.
Why does the regular wikipedia article contradict the simple wikipedia article?Pretty straightforward. Math guy should stick to math, again.
“In military tactics, a flanking maneuver (also called a flank attack), is an attack on the sides or rear of an opposing force”
Flanking maneuver - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
simple.m.wikipedia.org
And @EvilWayz how you get there is irrelevant. The term and tactical movement exists. Lizard was wrong again
Never said I was. I also wasn't moronic enough to say a gay advocacy group overrules the Bible on whether or not homosexuality is a sin (The Bible says it is).
Can we bring back @sadgator's thread on which 90 year-old he'd like to bang?Here is what the DoD has to say about envelopments and flanks, note that they separate flanks and rear, because they aren't the same thing. 🤣
vertical envelopment — A tactical maneuver in which troops that are air-dropped, airlanded, or inserted via air assault, attack the rear and flanks of a force, in effect cutting off or encircling the force.. (JP 3-18)
But just to educate you farther...
This is a flanking attack. Notice how the attack is on the SIDE. Also notice at the bottom how the arrows of attack to the SIDE are called "flanks".
This is a flanking attack. Again, note, an attack on the SIDE. Do you see an attack to the rear? You do not. Edit: Why is this picture not here? It's here in the preview. Let me look for another. Damn, it was a good one, too. Oh well.
Here is another flank attack. Note the blue armies ON THE SIDES, FLANKING THE ENEMY. Are they behind? THEY ARE NOT. Now, this picture is early in the battle, later, the Greeks swing around behind, in a DOUBLE ENVELOPMENT. Which is why the picture is titled Greek Double Envelopment.
This is an envelopment attack. Note how the attack comes around behind and ENVELOPES the opponent. Also note how each SIDE is noted as a FLANK. Now, do you see that notice on the rear? YOU DO NOT. See it's called a double envelopment because the opponent is being enveloped from both sides. If the rear were a flank, this would be called a triple flank maneuver, but there is no such thing as a triple flank, BECAUSE THERE ARE ONLY TWO FLANKS!
Once again, accept my superiority over you in ALL THINGS. Which TBH, isn't saying much.
Yeah, you're right, I'll just tell the DoD that they need to change their nomenclature because Navi said the rear is a flank.
🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
Ignore jfegs. He's dumber than the dog. I'll bet he's going to actually send an email to the DoD to tell them they are wrong, because Navi said so. 🤣🤣🤣
I wasn't around then but it's amazing how much he talks about false stuff or just lie because he's all in with Trump. He's the perfect person that was there Jan 6th. He's just that committed.
