ADVERTISEMENT

Next up FSU/UF

Doesn’t the SEC have more national titles in the last 20-30 years than any other conference by a long shot? Sorry the SEC can’t win the national title every single year. I’m pretty sure UF, Bama, LSU, Auburn and UT have all won a national title in the last 20-30’years. Know other conference is even close. That is why the SEC gets the respect they do.

As for Auburn I actually think they have improved since the Oregon game they are just losing to teams that are better than Oregon. Not sure your argument is making any sense. The SEC doesn’t build play anybody yet they have multiple programs that are capable and have won national titles, yet other conferences can’t seem to do the same?? Mmmm very interesting analysis. I guess it is because the PAC-10, Big 12, Big 10 and ACC play such demanding schedules. I mean Clemson and Ohio State have just played such a tough schedule so far! LOL

The ACC just might be the worst major conference ever. They literally have Clemson and nobody else. Who is their second best team? Wake Forest, lmao. Those jokers nearly lost to that awful Nole team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ih8f$u
Yes they could. Every1 thought bama was the greatest team of all time last yr. They play a real team in Clemson and catch a beat down. Georgia lost to Texas. When the SEC plays the best of other conferences, they lose too. However, this is the SEC's greatest trick. They play nobody during the yr and claim their conference is the best without proving it. The 2 best last yr got smacked around by Texas and Clemson. Why would we immediately assume that Bama is the best?

Oregon lost to Auburn at the beginning of the yr, teams change. Auburn has gotten worse and Oregon has gotten better.
Hey, it’s Danny Kanell!
 
Or is Clemson just that good...
That comment was mainly geared at the other teams in the ACC. Yes Clemson is good. What about the rest of the conference? Who is the 2nd best team in the ACC? Is that team even ranked in the top 25 b
 
All I know is we are the best 5 loss team you’ll face all year. Get ready for a war.

However,,,, :cool:
~ 5 loss Mizzou beat WVa 38-7, and WVa just won @ #24 K-St
~ 5 loss SCa beat #4 UGly in Athens.... :eek:

But I agree that the crims will give it all they got next week in the SWAMP.
 
That comment was mainly geared at the other teams in the ACC. Yes Clemson is good. What about the rest of the conference? Who is the 2nd best team in the ACC? Is that team even ranked in the top 25 b

I dont like rankings. They are skewed. Was Georgia ranked ahead of Texas last yr? Wasnt Bama ahead of clemson? Rankings are meaningless to me. I realize thats how most "measure" how good a team is but its horribly inaccurate. Dont get it twisted.... I dont think this is a strong yr for the ACC. We may very well be the worst of the p5s this yr. I think we fluctuate a lot in conference rankings from yr to yr.
 
However,,,, :cool:
~ 5 loss Mizzou beat WVa 38-7, and WVa just won @ #24 K-St
~ 5 loss SCa beat #4 UGly in Athens.... :eek:

But I agree that the crims will give it all they got next week in the SWAMP.

We would whip their ass in the dance off before the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: instaGATOR
I dont like rankings. They are skewed. Was Georgia ranked ahead of Texas last yr? Wasnt Bama ahead of clemson? Rankings are meaningless to me. I realize thats how most "measure" how good a team is but its horribly inaccurate. Dont get it twisted.... I dont think this is a strong yr for the ACC. We may very well be the worst of the p5s this yr. I think we fluctuate a lot in conference rankings from yr to yr.
You are talking about a 1 off/game scenario where upsets happen all the time. See USCjr over UGA. Should USCjr be ranked ahead of UGA since they beat them even though they are 4-7 on the year?? Rankings are determined by your body of work and what you have accomplished during the entire season.

Rankings are very meaningful because it takes the body of work not just 1 game.
 
You are talking about a 1 off/game scenario where upsets happen all the time. See USCjr over UGA. Should USCjr be ranked ahead of UGA since they beat them even though they are 4-7 on the year?? Rankings are determined by your body of work and what you have accomplished during the entire season.

Rankings are very meaningful because it takes the body of work not just 1 game.

How fo you judge someones body of work? Clemson has a far better body of work than Bama IMO and its not even close. I actually think Clemson has better wins than Bama. The SEC is pretty strong this yr but Bama only played Lsu....and was a punt return away from a blowout
 
How fo you judge someones body of work? Clemson has a far better body of work than Bama IMO and its not even close. I actually think Clemson has better wins than Bama. The SEC is pretty strong this yr but Bama only played Lsu....and was a punt return away from a blowout
Clemson has better wins than Bama?? Both of their best wins was against Texas A&M
 
Wake Forest is better than a and m.... Hate to break that to you. This is what i mean by living in the sec bubble.
Huh? No they aren’t. They just lost to Clemson 52-3. WK got crushed by VT also. A&M lost to Clemson by 14 points. Did you even know that? I’m guessing you didn’t. Talk about a bubble
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: NorthJerseyGator
Huh? No they aren’t. They just lost to Clemson 52-3. WK got crushed by VT also. A&M lost to Clemson by 14 points. Did you even know that? I’m guessing you didn’t. Talk about a bubble

Transitive property always works in football huh? Clemson is much better now then when they played a and m.
 
ACC is terrible. They get their second best team in the orange Bowl as well by contract. They will likely be unranked and with 4-5 losses.

Thats what happens when you constantly play ACC teams. We just beat up on each other.
 
Transitive property always works in football huh? Clemson is much better now then when they played a and m.
Never said it did but don’t try and tell me Wake Forest is better than A&M either. Look at Wake’s other losses as well. They are pretty bad losses.
 
ACC is terrible. They get their second best team in the orange Bowl as well by contract. They will likely be unranked and with 4-5 losses.

I remember 2005, the year FSU was 8-4 and ACC champ and got the Orange bowl. And lost. Bad as the ACC is this year, it's been worse.
 
A and m 31

Arkansas 27
Ok and that’s just 1 game yet you are the same person not telling us to use transitive property and that is basically what you are doing.

Look at WFs total body of work. A very underwhelming 7-3 record. They’ve got crushed a few times as well. They certainly wouldn’t be favored in a game against A&M.

A&M is just an above average team but still better than Wake Forest. They aren’t great by no means but they are competitive and haven’t got their doors blown off like Wake has a few times.
 
Let's get an outside opinion (AP) on both the SEC and the ACC right now. o_O

1. LSU
3. Clem
4. UGly
5. Bama
11. UF
15. AU

ACC - Only 1 Team even in the Top 25 :rolleyes:
(hell, the LAC10/12 and the 'Group of 5' has more than the ACC's 1) :D:p:D

SEC - 3 Teams in the Top 5, and 2 more Teams in the top 15 (5 total).... :eek:

#2 conference is the Big10/12

2. tOSU
8. PSU
10 Minn
12. Wis
13. Mich
17. Iowa
1 Top 5, 2 Top 10's, 2 Top 15's, with a total of 6 in the Top 25.
 
Va, Va Tech and Wake are the next in line after Clemson. Not sure which is the best of that group, but I would put them all in between TAMU and UT as far as strength goes. Well, VA Tech might be equal to the Aggies, so I guess they would be the #2 in the ACC. Which would make them the 6th best team were they in the SEC.
 
How fo you judge someones body of work? Clemson has a far better body of work than Bama IMO and its not even close. I actually think Clemson has better wins than Bama. The SEC is pretty strong this yr but Bama only played Lsu....and was a punt return away from a blowout

Huh? I think Bama’s schedule is week but Clemson’s is hella weak. If you’re gonna bash Bama’s schedule you damn sure can’t say Clemson has any quality wins. Their best win is A&M who’s gonna end up with 5 losses in what you call the overrated SEC. Clemson hasn’t beat a ranked team all year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GwinnettDawg
Huh? I think Bama’s schedule is week but Clemson’s is hella weak. If you’re gonna bash Bama’s schedule you damn sure can’t say Clemson has any quality wins. Their best win is A&M who’s gonna end up with 5 losses in what you call the overrated SEC. Clemson hasn’t beat a ranked team all year.

Neither has bama. Bama plays the easiest schedule damn near every yr. You dont win 98% of your conference games because your conference is good. The SEC leg humpers are always good for a lugh tho. Yet over the past 5 yrs its pretty even if wins and losses against each other. I have to dig up the stats constantly for people and show them. The sec was far better for about 10 straight yrs. Its not that way anymore. You guys were claiming bama was the team ever last yr..... Then clemson steam rolled them
 
Neither has bama. Bama plays the easiest schedule damn near every yr. You dont win 98% of your conference games because your conference is good. The SEC leg humpers are always good for a lugh tho. Yet over the past 5 yrs its pretty even if wins and losses against each other. I have to dig up the stats constantly for people and show them. The sec was far better for about 10 straight yrs. Its not that way anymore. You guys were claiming bama was the team ever last yr..... Then clemson steam rolled them

Yea, that’s the point. Bama’s schedule is weak but homerism and SEC hate can’t even keep you from admitting Clemson’s is worse. If you think Bama hasn’t beat anybody, and they haven’t, then the same is true for Clemson. And no I didn’t think Bama was the best team last year. Pretty sure the posts are still on here. And said LSU would win the SEC in preseason. So it has nothing to do with pumping them up.
 
Yea, that’s the point. Bama’s schedule is weak but homerism and SEC hate can’t even keep you from admitting Clemson’s is worse. If you think Bama hasn’t beat anybody, and they haven’t, then the same is true for Clemson. And no I didn’t think Bama was the best team last year. Pretty sure the posts are still on here. And said LSU would win the SEC in preseason. So it has nothing to do with pumping them up.

Clemsons is dedinitely not worse. Its even at worst for clemson
 
Clemsons is dedinitely not worse. Its even at worst for clemson
Both Bama and Clemson played A&M but Bama will also have played LSU and Auburn. Clemson played mighty Wake Forest as their 2nd toughest opponent.
 
Bama lost to LSU..... I only care about wins. Auburn is terrible.
Well Auburn is better than anybody on Clemson’s schedule. Sorry you walked right into that one. Clemson has ZERO wins then in your scenario.
 
I dont like rankings. They are skewed. Was Georgia ranked ahead of Texas last yr? Wasnt Bama ahead of clemson? Rankings are meaningless to me. I realize thats how most "measure" how good a team is but its horribly inaccurate. Dont get it twisted.... I dont think this is a strong yr for the ACC. We may very well be the worst of the p5s this yr. I think we fluctuate a lot in conference rankings from yr to yr.
Ranking aren't meaningless but they usually get corrected by the end of the year. Week 1-5 half of the teams in the top 15 aren't close to where they will be at the end of the year and there will probably be 3-4 that aren't ranked at all by the end of the season.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT