ADVERTISEMENT

NCAA to pass rule to try and cut down on grad transfers?

Gator Fever

Bull Gator
Feb 13, 2008
27,596
10,629
113
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/04/sports/ncaa-final-four-graduate-transfers.html

The graduate transfer rule, the rare N.C.A.A. regulation that gives leverage to the athlete, has been used by hundreds of players since it was relaxed in 2011. And at a moment when athletic admission graft, shoe company payola and questions about whether a transcendent (and unpaid) figure like Zion Williamson should even risk playing college basketball at all, the graduate transfer rule casts the beleaguered N.C.A.A. as reasonable and almost munificent.

It is also a rule that may not last much longer.

In two weeks, the N.C.A.A.’s primary legislative body, the Division I Council, will vote on a measure that could severely restrict graduate transfers. The proposed rule change would require that colleges accepting graduate transfers be docked a scholarship the next year if the transfer does not earn his secondary degree within a year.....

The rule itself seems to have come straight from the mouth of Kentucky Coach John Calipari, who suggested to ESPN in 2016 — long before the committee began its work — that “if the kid gets his grad degree in one year, fine; if he doesn’t, you’ve got to use the scholarship for two years.”
----------------------

I wonder how much this will affect football if it does pass as some think it will. I would think a player you already know what you are getting may be worth the scholarship loss the next year.
 
They have already initiated the era of unrestricted free agency with the transfer portal waiting period waivers they’ve granted this year, so why would they even give a crap about grad transfers...

Which is dumb in my opinion. I like the rule of sitting out a yr if you transfer. Now people can just wah wah about anything and get approval to play right away.
 
Not liking where you fall on the depth chart is now apparently a “mitigating circumstance” under the transfer/waiver rule given their decision as to Martel and Fields.

sadgator isn’t sure how he feels about it...the rule had a purpose, but it’s a sham anyway. If you’re gonna go, you’re gonna go...and coaches can move without penalty, so why not players?
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/04/sports/ncaa-final-four-graduate-transfers.html

The graduate transfer rule, the rare N.C.A.A. regulation that gives leverage to the athlete, has been used by hundreds of players since it was relaxed in 2011. And at a moment when athletic admission graft, shoe company payola and questions about whether a transcendent (and unpaid) figure like Zion Williamson should even risk playing college basketball at all, the graduate transfer rule casts the beleaguered N.C.A.A. as reasonable and almost munificent.

It is also a rule that may not last much longer.

In two weeks, the N.C.A.A.’s primary legislative body, the Division I Council, will vote on a measure that could severely restrict graduate transfers. The proposed rule change would require that colleges accepting graduate transfers be docked a scholarship the next year if the transfer does not earn his secondary degree within a year.....

The rule itself seems to have come straight from the mouth of Kentucky Coach John Calipari, who suggested to ESPN in 2016 — long before the committee began its work — that “if the kid gets his grad degree in one year, fine; if he doesn’t, you’ve got to use the scholarship for two years.”
----------------------

I wonder how much this will affect football if it does pass as some think it will. I would think a player you already know what you are getting may be worth the scholarship loss the next year.
Those fvckers are clueless. They come up with this as they allow pouting underckassmen to transfer over playing time and be eligible immediately. Ok then.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oozie7
Which is dumb in my opinion. I like the rule of sitting out a yr if you transfer. Now people can just wah wah about anything and get approval to play right away.

Yea the NCAA is getting it ass backwards as usual. Grad transfers ain't the problem, if anything that should be encouraged more. Graduate early and you're free to go where you want. Win-win if we really wanna keep pushing this student-athlete narrative, they're earning the right to transfer by investing in their education. What they need to kill are the freshmen and sophomores or whoever transferring, applying for a waiver, and playing ASAP for no real reason.
 
This is a hard to respect from an organization that allows millionaire coaches to job-hop like brazen man-hoes.

This is and always will be the DUMBEST argument i have ever heard. The coaches can do it why cant the palyers. Its like when my 3 yr old wants ice cream at midnight just becuz im eating. Grow a spine. Lifes not fair
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dannygator1989
Yea the NCAA is getting it ass backwards as usual. Grad transfers ain't the problem, if anything that should be encouraged more. Graduate early and you're free to go where you want. Win-win if we really wanna keep pushing this student-athlete narrative, they're earning the right to transfer by investing in their education. What they need to kill are the freshmen and sophomores or whoever transferring, applying for a waiver, and playing ASAP for no real reason.

What is going to start happening is the occasional gem that gets missed and goes to a non-power 5 school will be recruited by the bigger schools to transfer there "to increase their NFL profile".

The one year no-play rule wasn't designed to force kids to stay at a school, it was to eliminate the incentive for coaches to poach kids from other schools.
 
This is and always will be the DUMBEST argument i have ever heard. The coaches can do it why cant the palyers. Its like when my 3 yr old wants ice cream at midnight just becuz im eating. Grow a spine. Lifes not fair

It’s not fair but I think the reason they’re getting pushback on this is because of the straight up lying a lot of coaches are doing when it comes to recruiting. For example some coaches accept jobs with other teams before signing day, but then the staffs wait until after signing day to announce it because those coaches are tied to a recruit. So the recruit signs expecting that coach to be there and he isn’t. Right or wrong we know players choose schools for a coach, it’s easy to say choose a school regardless of coach but it’s that coach recruiting a player for years and sitting in his living room with his family recruiting him to a school.

It’s an easy fix for that too. But like with everything else the NCAA is always reacting instead of making the first move.
 
I'm honestly surprised that none of the big national media organizations, like the NY Times, WSJ or WaPo haven't done a big, muck-raking, expose on the money behind college football, especially guys like Jimmy Sexton. How has that guy gotten away his hustle all this time without being scrutinized?

When the Jameis Winston stuff was going down at FSU, the NYTimes had a guy actually living in Tallahassee, full-time, for months, just cranking out article after article, with dirt that he had been digging up.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT