ADVERTISEMENT

Murkowski and Collins vote no on Hegseth in test vote, but Pete

Recruiting increased under Austin from when he took over.
Let's fact check this with Grok:

Did enrollment in the US military increase or decrease after Lloyd Austin was named Sec of Def under Biden?

Grok:
I'm sorry, but I don't have sufficient data to provide a definitive answer on whether U.S. military enrollment specifically increased or decreased immediately following Lloyd Austin's appointment as Secretary of Defense under President Biden in January 2021. However, I can provide context based on available information and trends in military recruitment during that period.

Context and Available Data:
  • Lloyd Austin's Appointment: Lloyd Austin was confirmed as the 28th United States Secretary of Defense on January 22, 2021, becoming the first African American to hold the position. His tenure began during the Biden administration, which prioritized diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives within the military, among other policy shifts.
  • Recruitment Trends Before and During Austin's Tenure:
    • Pre-2021 Challenges: The U.S. military faced recruitment challenges in the years leading up to 2021, influenced by factors such as a strong economy (pre-COVID-19), low unemployment rates, and a shrinking pool of eligible recruits due to health, education, or legal issues. The COVID-19 pandemic further complicated recruitment efforts in 2020, with closures of schools and public spaces limiting recruiters' access to potential enlistees.
    • 2021 and Beyond: According to posts on X and web reports, the U.S. military experienced significant recruitment difficulties during the Biden administration, including under Austin's leadership. For instance, a post by
      @Jim_Banks
      on February 4, 2025, claimed that "Under Biden and Lloyd Austin, we had the worst recruitment crisis in 50 years." While this is a statement from a political figure and not a verified statistic, it reflects a sentiment echoed in other sources.
  • Specific Data Points:
    • 2022 Recruitment Shortfalls: The Army, in particular, missed its recruiting goal by about 15,000 recruits (25% of its target) in 2022, marking one of the worst recruiting years since the end of the Vietnam War draft in 1973. Other branches, such as the Navy and Air Force, also struggled but managed to meet adjusted targets in some years.
    • 2023 and 2024 Trends: While the Army continued to face challenges, there were reports of slight improvements in 2024, with the Army meeting its recruiting goals for the first time in two years, though still at historically low levels. However, these improvements were attributed to new strategies, such as increased bonuses or relaxed entry standards, rather than a direct link to Austin's policies.
  • Factors Influencing Recruitment:
    • DEI Initiatives: Critics, including some political figures and commentators on X, have argued that the Biden administration's focus on DEI initiatives under Austin's leadership—such as addressing racism, extremism, and gender diversity in the military—may have deterred some potential recruits. For example, posts on X, like one from
      @jackburton109
      , claim that "Lloyd Austin presided over the lowest recruitment in 80 years," linking this to a focus on DEI over lethality. However, this is a sentiment rather than a verified causal relationship.
    • Economic and Social Factors: Post-COVID economic recovery, a competitive job market, and changing societal attitudes toward military service (e.g., concerns about "woke" policies or vaccine mandates)) also contributed to recruitment challenges during this period.
    • Policy Shifts: Austin's tenure included high-profile policy decisions, such as the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021, which drew significant criticism and may have impacted public perception of military leadership. While this event did not directly cause a recruitment drop, it could have influenced trust in military institutions.

Conclusion:
While I cannot provide a precise statistic on military enrollment immediately following Austin's appointment in January 2021, the broader trend during his tenure (2021–2025) indicates a decrease in military recruitment, with the U.S. military facing some of its worst recruiting years in decades. This decline was influenced by a combination of factors, including pre-existing challenges, economic conditions, policy decisions, and public perception of the military under Austin's leadership. However, there is no direct evidence linking Austin's appointment itself to an immediate drop in enrollment; rather, the recruitment crisis deepened over time during his tenure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
23 percent of gen z is fully qualified to join the military without a waiver and 9 percent of that percentage is inclined to serve their country at all.

It's not Austin's fault we're breeding fat, stupid, cowardly children.
It’s his fault they let those people in the military, and then allow for them to stay fat.
 
Recruiting increased under Austin from when he took over. Retention rates are pretty much a flat line. I am so saddened on how much lack of understanding you guys have for DEI but that is an opinion. IDK man, you guys love being ignorant to topics.
Show the data.
 
Recruiting increased under Austin from when he took over. Retention rates are pretty much a flat line. I am so saddened on how much lack of understanding you guys have for DEI but that is an opinion. IDK man, you guys love being ignorant to topics.
Are you high. The Army had to create a fat camp and a dumb camp just to get some of these gen z idiots into boot camp.
 
Are you high. The Army had to create a fat camp and a dumb camp just to get some of these gen z idiots into boot camp.
I am saying the new batch of people are special and I am that we sure the similar opinions on these gen z kids but based on metrics everything I said was accurate.

You guys are some very emotional men. You guys let your feeling dictate too many opinions/thoughts. A lot of feminine energy from you guys 😂.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: nail1988

Your link is for the Army only. Let's look at their numbers for regular Army:

2020 recruiting goal was 61,200. They hit that goal 100%. (Trump's last year)

2021 recruiting goal was 57,500. They hit that goal 100% (Austin's first year)

2022 recruiting goal was 60,000. They missed that goal badly with only 44,901

2023 recruiting goal was 65,500. They missed that goal badly with only 50.161

2024 recruiting goal was 55,000. They hit that goal 100%

Your own numbers confirm how disappointing Army recruiting was under Austin. Trump's last year he was dealing with covid lockdowns and still did better than any year under Austin. That's incredible.
 

You do realize you’re facts and figures argue against what you’re saying and in favor of what we’re saying. Just for what it’s worth, lol.

And without the incredible November and December months in 2024 after Trump won the election they would’ve missed their goal again.

I mean, when you can sit there and post things that clearly don’t support your argument and act like they do that makes you either a liar, a zealot, or an ignorant fool. I’m thinking all three may apply in your case. That’s the price of being a true believer in an anti-Trump Guy I guess.
 
How much do you guys think you will ever gain with arguing with someone devoid of so much just common sense that thinks Biden did well as president On what planet did Biden do well as president. A complete waste of time engaging with that kind of thinking, if that's what you call it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Capt Ron 1
Killingagoodman, you are still the waste of space that you've always been imo.
I'll now leave you to others to continue to beat up on your idiocy....
 
  • Haha
Reactions: gatordad3
How much do you guys think you will ever gain with arguing with someone devoid of so much just common sense that thinks Biden did well as president On what planet did Biden do well as president. A complete waste of time engaging with that kind of thinking, if that's what you call it.
Everybody likes slapping around an arrogant idiot from time to time :) it’s like playing with your food
 
  • Haha
Reactions: gatordad3
You do realize you’re facts and figures argue against what you’re saying and in favor of what we’re saying. Just for what it’s worth, lol.

And without the incredible November and December months in 2024 after Trump won the election they would’ve missed their goal again.

I mean, when you can sit there and post things that clearly don’t support your argument and act like they do that makes you either a liar, a zealot, or an ignorant fool. I’m thinking all three may apply in your case. That’s the price of being a true believer in an anti-Trump Guy I guess.

Thank you for proving us right........again.
That is not what the data said. That is YOUR spin to be right. Give Trump credit for anything because he is around and then blame others for his failures. Even your lie indicates that enroll increased under Austin. He was still in charge until like 2 weeks ago.

They had in increase BEFORE the election....200,000 in FY 2023 to 225,000 in FY 2024, which ended September 30.

I have no idea why you guys have to lie about the dumbest shit.
 
That is not what the data said. That is YOUR spin to be right. Give Trump credit for anything because he is around and then blame others for his failures. Even your lie indicates that enroll increased under Austin. He was still in charge until like 2 weeks ago.

They had in increase BEFORE the election....200,000 in FY 2023 to 225,000 in FY 2024, which ended September 30.

I have no idea why you guys have to lie about the dumbest shit.
OK, Skippy
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT