ADVERTISEMENT

Military chopper crashes into airliner....terrorism or crazy accident?

I thought they said she was the 3rd member of the helo crew.

I think she was flying. They scrubbed her and her families social media prior to releasing her name. My guess is she just violated safety rules but whether she was a hire that was a PC hire we might never know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCSpell
No. Apparently if this ain't a guy, it's a lesbian. You should do better research before posting nonsense. Why would family members delete their own content? This person was an ass kissing Democrat fluffer. That information is out there, do your own research.
I really don't care about that but once again you proving my point. The right isn't focused on why the crash happened or how. They are focused on if the pilots were DEI hires and their sexuality. See how YOU pointed out she was lesbian? She how YOU focused on her gender? So YOU guys care more about sex, gender, sexuality.

Let You Know Black Boy GIF by Neesin
 
I really don't care about that but once again you proving my point. The right isn't focused on why the crash happened or how. They are focused on if the pilots were DEI hires and their sexuality. See how YOU pointed out she was lesbian? She how YOU focused on her gender? So YOU guys care more about sex, gender, sexuality.

Let You Know Black Boy GIF by Neesin
Do you have any questions as to why they withheld her name while they scrubbed her social media? I DO...ESPECIALLY since the last administration lied about EVERYTHING they did.
 
Just as we thought, all the while they tried to conceal the pilots identities.


That one doesn't hold water with me. If she was SIC (Second in command...aka "co-pilot"), then the PIC (Pilot in command) was the captain. While both can land the plane, usually in bad conditions - like that encountered in Toronto - the PIC is going to be at the controls - particularly if the SIC has a low amount of hours in the model of plane.
 
That one doesn't hold water with me. If she was SIC (Second in command...aka "co-pilot"), then the PIC (Pilot in command) was the captain. While both can land the plane, usually in bad conditions - like that encountered in Toronto - the PIC is going to be at the controls - particularly if the SIC has a low amount of hours in the model of plane.

Looking a video, it looks to me like the landing gear collapsed. If that happens, even Sully couldn't have saved it.
 
Looking a video, it looks to me like the landing gear collapsed. If that happens, even Sully couldn't have saved it.
Came in hot and hard...wonder if there was a sudden down draft? Wind was howling. The black box will tell the tale. They will be able to see if the pilot was pulling up or not when the plane came in.
 
Came in hot and hard...wonder if there was a sudden down draft? Wind was howling. The black box will tell the tale. They will be able to see if the pilot was pulling up or not when the plane came in.
Very possible it was wind shear. Wind was out of 270° at 28 KTS, gusting to 35. That in and of itself is not that bad, it is the crosswind component that is more critical. I think they were landing runway 24 (not sure). If so, that makes the crosswind component 50%, of those numbers, so 14, gusting 17. For big planes, that is nothing - they do that all of the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Capt Ron 1
Very possible it was wind shear. Wind was out of 270° at 28 KTS, gusting to 35. That in and of itself is not that bad, it is the crosswind component that is more critical. I think they were landing runway 24 (not sure). If so, that makes the crosswind component 50%, of those numbers, so 14, gusting 17. For big planes, that is nothing - they do that all of the time.
I find it kind of hard to believe someone with the capability to land a plane like that did not understand they were coming in to steep. I saw one blown up shot of the landing from the right rear, and it looks like it hit so hard a wing came off and the gear gave away. But these investigators are incredible, and I am sure they will know exactly what happened
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
I really don't care about that but once again you proving my point. The right isn't focused on why the crash happened or how. They are focused on if the pilots were DEI hires and their sexuality. See how YOU pointed out she was lesbian? She how YOU focused on her gender? So YOU guys care more about sex, gender, sexuality.

Let You Know Black Boy GIF by Neesin
But what if the crash happened because someone was operating the plane on characteristics other than merit and experience and people died?

We’re supposed to ignore that?

The “cause” has become clear, and ineptitude is the culprit.
 
As we all suspected

Biden DEI twink kills 70 people


What I posted earlier in this thread:

1.) Training mission
2.) Female trainee male instructor
3.) politically active and possible unqualified connection hire
4.) didn't maintain proper altitude.
5.) radar shows a right turn into the plane.

Now it seems common sense to me that a plane in front of you descending to your right to land at an airport also to your right, that you should maintain proper altitude and BANK LEFT. But I am not a pilot.

According to the X post her warrant officer co-pilot told her to turn LEFT.

Incompetent wokesters have hubris and no common sense. That's a deadly combination when dealing with situations like this.

 
Did she do it on purpose or was allowing her to even be in that spot what led to this. Sounds like she was really hard headed and known for ignoring protocol in the past according to some people who worked with her. Crazy she doesn't turn when told like that after having to be told to get lower and snowballing doing that apparently also.
 


What a fricking joke. Even the NTSB (or at least some lefty there leaking) is trying to preemptively blame anything but the person responsible for this tragedy. He starts telling her to head left as they were told by controllers 15 seconds before impact meaning there would literally be just a couple of seconds left after repeating what controllers told her but this clown and BS article is trying to blame him instead of the pilot ignoring instructions not once but twice because he didn't take control with just a couple of seconds. The only facts up for debate here are whether she did it purposely or whether this "strong" female got a bunch of people killed because she was hard headed and didn't like being given instructions on her flying.
 
Did she do it on purpose or was allowing her to even be in that spot what led to this. Sounds like she was really hard headed and known for ignoring protocol in the past according to some people who worked with her. Crazy she doesn't turn when told like that after having to be told to get lower and snowballing doing that apparently also.
No straight white male was going to tell her to do anything!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT