ADVERTISEMENT

Kyle Rittenhouse found NOT GUILTY on ALL COUNTS

Another full blown RACIST Piece of S**t. Fortunately, with the scum network that he, she or it is on, hardly anyone watches this B****h.


"I find these people disgusting.…
I’m disgusted at what I’m seeing." -- Cross


Cross said she took issue with Gaetz and Gosar offering to hire Rittenhouse as a congressional intern after the trial concluded, claiming the Republicans were celebrating the outcome of the trial.

Well, that's likely because she identifies more with interns that are more like her, i.e. Monica....
 
I wouldn’t be surprised if Trump encourages Rittenhouse to file a defamation/slander suit against Biden, and even funds it. I might pitch in a few bucks as much as I hate Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
You can't sue a sitting president, but I wonder if you can sue his campaign?


You brought up a good point. Technically, Biden didn’t say “Rittenhouse is a white supremacist.” His campaign used Rittenhouse’s picture in a way that implies as such. So, Biden likely couldn’t be sued in his personal capacity, even if he wasn’t president. And “Biden for President” was probably dissolved after the election.

But, that leaves plenty of s—- stirring media outlets for Rittenhouse to go after.
 
Actually there are blacks involved through association in that the reason for the Kenosha riots in the first place was the shooting of a black man, Jacob Blake, so you can associate it even indirectly to a black man.
Oh, you mean the "UN-ARMED" black man, who was carring a KNIFE, while violating a restraining order, who was resisting arrest, fought through being tazed, before being shot, who also admitted on National TV in an interview that he had a knife and probably shouldn't have resisted arrest.
 
You brought up a good point. Technically, Biden didn’t say “Rittenhouse is a white supremacist.” His campaign used Rittenhouse’s picture in a way that implies as such. So, Biden likely couldn’t be sued in his personal capacity, even if he wasn’t president. And “Biden for President” was probably dissolved after the election.

But, that leaves plenty of s—- stirring media outlets for Rittenhouse to go after.
Implied or otherwise is still culpability. However, Al Charlatan basically lit the torches for rioters and never even was questioned about it.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: BCSpell
1637443336625-png.863076
 
Except, with this crappy prosecuter, same results.
I don't understand why people complain about the prosecutor being crappy in the Rittenhouse case. It made it that much easier for the jury to come to the correct conclusion. And the judge was good.

OJ got off despite Ito unfairly aiding the prosecution.

OJ got off due to jury nullification, his race, and the feeling that the prosecution and judge were "cheating" OJ out of a fair trial.
 
I don't understand why people complain about the prosecutor being crappy in the Rittenhouse case. It made it that much easier for the jury to come to the correct conclusion. And the judge was good.

OJ got off despite Ito unfairly aiding the prosecution.

OJ got off due to jury nullification, his race, and the feeling that the prosecution and judge were "cheating" OJ out of a fair trial.
My point was, because this prosecuter and the case he brought being really bad (never should have been charged in the first place), and then all the crap he did in the courtroom, that even if Rittenhouse was a young black man, the jury still would have come to the correct conclusion.
 
I don't understand why people complain about the prosecutor being crappy in the Rittenhouse case. It made it that much easier for the jury to come to the correct conclusion. And the judge was good.

OJ got off despite Ito unfairly aiding the prosecution.

OJ got off due to jury nullification, his race, and the feeling that the prosecution and judge were "cheating" OJ out of a fair trial.
Furthermore, the jury was bullied by the mob and in the case of KR, the jurors were not intimidated by the threats from the mob. The people of Wisconsin apparently have much more integrity than the people of California when it comes to performing their judicial duty.
 

Rosenbaum had multiple convictions in Pima County, spending just over 14 years in prison. He served the first 10 years on his first rape charge. However, for the two other rape charges he only received sentences of 30 months.

WRN Investigates reported that Rosenbaum was charged by a grand jury with 11 counts of child molestation and inappropriate sexual activity around children, including anal rape. The victims were five boys ranging in age from nine to 11 years old.

According to Yahoo News, “Hours before the fatal encounter, Rosenbaum had been released from a local hospital in the wake of a suicide attempt. He had pending charges in Wisconsin for alleged domestic abuse and jumping bail at the time of his death.”
 
Last edited:

Rosenbaum had multiple convictions in Pima County, spending just over 14 years in prison. He served the first 10 years on his first rape charge. However, for the two other rape charges he only received sentences of 30 months.

WRN Investigates reported that Rosenbaum was charged by a grand jury with 11 counts of child molestation and inappropriate sexual activity around children, including anal rape. The victims were five boys ranging in age from nine to 11 years old.

According to Yahoo News, “Hours before the fatal encounter, Rosenbaum had been released from a local hospital in the wake of a suicide attempt. He had pending charges in Wisconsin for alleged domestic abuse and jumping bail at the time of his death.”
That is despicable that a violent act as rape only adds to a few years behind bars. He should have been castrated and left tied to a fire ant mound.
 
If you were upset by the verdict in this case, then the media sources you trusted to inform you about the trial, lied to you.

Anyone that followed this trial and understood the law, knew that the prosecution had very little case going into the trial. During the course of the trial, prosecution and its own witnesses completely undermined what little case they had, and by the time it was handed to the jury to decide, it had been decided.

If your media sources are telling you that this verdict was racist, a miscarriage of justice or shouldn't have happened, then you are being lied to.

And I suspect most of you on the left are fine with that, as long as it's the lie you want to hear.
 
Wizards 1st Rule is -- 'People are Stupid'

"People are stupid; given proper motivation, almost anyone will believe almost anything. Because people are stupid, they will believe a lie because they want to believe it's true, or because they are afraid it might be true. People's heads are full of knowledge, facts, and beliefs, and most of it is false, yet they think it all true.

People are stupid; they can only rarely tell the difference between a lie and the truth, and yet they are confident they can, and so are all the easier to fool."

And then there are the total Village Idiots like the GhostofBrainless....
 
  • Like
Reactions: EvilWayz
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT