KABOOM!!!!!! Our President Trump sues the FBI

[armbar73]

Trump isn't a politician. He's a Patriot. That's why politicians like obama, Hiden and the Bushes hate him.

This is a terribly naive and/or stupid statement. He campaigned for and held a political office. He may not be a career politician, but he is a politician.

And, I actually think he is brilliant at the game of politics. Nobody turns bad press to their advantage like Trump.

 

[RayGravesGhost]

We'll see if that's the case when he's indicted

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

This is a terribly naive and/or stupid statement.

You fell for the 'Trump is 0-70 in election court cases' lie. You're in no position to call anyone else here naive or stupid.

 

[RayGravesGhost]

Please tell us what election court cases trump won... this ought to be good 🤣

 

[BayouGator1995]

This is a terribly naive and/or stupid statement. He campaigned for and held a political office. He may not be a career politician, but he is a politician.

And, I actually think he is brilliant at the game of politics. Nobody turns bad press to their advantage like Trump.

Politicians yield and submit to the special interests they serve (i.e. deep state establishment). Trump NEVER did that. He put this country before political BS. And it showed in his accomplishments.

 

[RayGravesGhost]

Politicians yield and submit to the special interests they serve (i.e. deep state establishment). Trump NEVER did that. He put this country before political BS. And it showed in his accomplishments.

Uhhh...ever heard of evangelicals?
He turned over the whole idea of SCOTUS appointments to them

How about oil interests?
He went and begged OPEC to keep oil prices artificially high in the middle of the pandemic

Agriculture special interests?
He paid them the biggest subsidies in history


the village idiot strikes again

 

[armbar73]

You fell for the 'Trump is 0-70 in election court cases' lie. You're in no position to call anyone else here naive or stupid.

I actually gave him a compliment on his political savvy and this is the best you can do.

First, I never said 0-70. I said fourty plus. The article below states over 50 dismissed by state and federal courts. Now, I know the next thing you are going to try claim technicalities or some other nonsense. When you are the plaintiff in a case and it gets dismissed, you pretty much lost. The fact is he isn’t fairing well with lawsuits.

Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented...

www.reuters.com

 

[Capt Ron 1]

We'll see if that's the case when he's indicted

RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

First, I never said 0-70. I said fourty plus. The article below states over 50 dismissed by state and federal courts.

Actually, here's what your link says:


"Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President Donald Trump and his allies challenging the election or its outcome."

This is how it's so easy to dupe people who want to be duped.

'His allies' in this case refers to the plantiffs in almost all of the 0-70 or 0-50 cases. And typically, the plantiffs were disgruntled voters in swing states that felt the election was stolen from them. So they filed a suit that really wasn't organized and was basically them saying 'Dammit this aint right!' with no actual legal case supporting that.

And Trump's team has admitted that most of those cases should have never been brought to a court and SHOULD have lost.

But the media needed to create the narrative that the election was safe and secure, so they spun all these frivolous suits from disgruntled voters as actually being from Trump, cause they lost.

This lie was started by dem operative Marc Elias. Who, coincidentally, is currently part of John Durham's CRIMINAL investigation into the 2016 election.

You would know all this, if you had actually researched this topic, instead of blindly accepting talking points that were fed to you by lefty media sources.

But you wanted to believe that Trump was losing a lot of cases, so you never questioned.

Yet when you see a link saying Trump has actually WON most of the election cases, THAT you question LOL

This is how sheep stay hoodwinked.

 

[NavigatorII]

We'll see if that's the case when he's indicted

 

[jfegaly]

Actually, here's what your link says:


"Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President Donald Trump and his allies challenging the election or its outcome."

This is how it's so easy to dupe people who want to be duped.

'His allies' in this case refers to the plantiffs in almost all of the 0-70 or 0-50 cases. And typically, the plantiffs were disgruntled voters in swing states that felt the election was stolen from them. So they filed a suit that really wasn't organized and was basically them saying 'Dammit this aint right!' with no actual legal case supporting that.

And Trump's team has admitted that most of those cases should have never been brought to a court and SHOULD have lost.

But the media needed to create the narrative that the election was safe and secure, so they spun all these frivolous suits from disgruntled voters as actually being from Trump, cause they lost.

This lie was started by dem operative Marc Elias. Who, coincidentally, is currently part of John Durham's CRIMINAL investigation into the 2016 election.

You would know all this, if you had actually researched this topic, instead of blindly accepting talking points that were fed to you by lefty media sources.

But you wanted to believe that Trump was losing a lot of cases, so you never questioned.

Yet when you see a link saying Trump has actually WON most of the election cases, THAT you question LOL

This is how sheep stay hoodwinked.

Language/verbiage is very important. The media knows this, but unfortunately I have yet to meet a lib that doesn’t get caught in the trap. Crazy

 

[nail1988]

Says who Gay-RayGraves....I mean, BSCHizoid911......Salon? Vox? Vanity Fair? Cosmopolitan? CNN? MSNBC?

At this juncture, it's quite obvious how stupid you and the rest of Lib-Tard Nation looks. Here's what you continually deny....

1) Andrew Weissman - proved there was no Russian Collusion Robert Mueller vehemently tried to find...

2) "impeachment #1" came up empty much to the anger of Botox Nancy Vodka-losi....

3) "impeachment #2" (see #2)

4) Cassiy "Smollett" Hutchinson's testimony about Trump's behavior in the Beast limo with the Secret Service guy proved to be a farce as the SS guy proved she wasn't even there.....

5) FBLie Mar-A-Lago Raid proves to be another witch-hunt as Trump calls out Merrick Garland's bluff on releasing the affidavit in its present unredacted form....

So there, 5-0......but hey we know you're toying with the idea of becoming a Drag Queen story-time-teller. You do support pedophiles after all🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

[armbar73]

Actually, here's what your link says:


"Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President Donald Trump and his allies challenging the election or its outcome."

This is how it's so easy to dupe people who want to be duped.

'His allies' in this case refers to the plantiffs in almost all of the 0-70 or 0-50 cases. And typically, the plantiffs were disgruntled voters in swing states that felt the election was stolen from them. So they filed a suit that really wasn't organized and was basically them saying 'Dammit this aint right!' with no actual legal case supporting that.

And Trump's team has admitted that most of those cases should have never been brought to a court and SHOULD have lost.

But the media needed to create the narrative that the election was safe and secure, so they spun all these frivolous suits from disgruntled voters as actually being from Trump, cause they lost.

This lie was started by dem operative Marc Elias. Who, coincidentally, is currently part of John Durham's CRIMINAL investigation into the 2016 election.

You would know all this, if you had actually researched this topic, instead of blindly accepting talking points that were fed to you by lefty media sources.

But you wanted to believe that Trump was losing a lot of cases, so you never questioned.

Yet when you see a link saying Trump has actually WON most of the election cases, THAT you question LOL

This is how sheep stay hoodwinked.

I’m going out of a limb that if “his allies” had won half of those 50, you would bend the narrative to match your view and consider those wins.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

I’m going out of a limb that if “his allies” had won half of those 50, you would bend the narrative to match your view and consider those wins.

This is so dishonest and the left ALWAYS does this. Whenever bad behavior is highlighted on their side, they NEVER admit it, they ALWAYS attempt to project that the 'other side' is just as bad, so their bad behavior is actually standard behavior.

No, I wouldn't lie about the results, because if I did, it would be painfully easy to set the record straight, as I did here with you.

What YOU should be doing is focusing on why you were lied to. And ask yourself 'Ok, if they lied to me about this, have they lied to me about anything else?'

Unless of course, you just love hearing bad stories about Trump, and could care less if they are rooted in reality, or complete lies.

If that's what makes you horny, then carry on.

 

[NavigatorII]

I’m going out of a limb that if “his allies” had won half of those 50, you would bend the narrative to match your view and consider those wins.

You still aren't getting it. They're not coming after Trump. They are coming for us.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Language/verbiage is very important. The media knows this, but unfortunately I have yet to meet a lib that doesn’t get caught in the trap. Crazy

I think they just want to hear that Trump is a meanie. They don't care if it's a lie or not.

 

[RayGravesGhost]

trump hasn't won a election case....

If he won one...what was the outcome?
Did he get a participation award and told to go home?

What where the decisions of the court?

 

[armbar73]

This is so dishonest and the left ALWAYS does this. Whenever bad behavior is highlighted on their side, they NEVER admit it, they ALWAYS attempt to project that the 'other side' is just as bad, so their bad behavior is actually standard behavior.

No, I wouldn't lie about the results, because if I did, it would be painfully easy to set the record straight, as I did here with you.

What YOU should be doing is focusing on why you were lied to. And ask yourself 'Ok, if they lied to me about this, have they lied to me about anything else?'

Unless of course, you just love hearing bad stories about Trump, and could care less if they are rooted in reality, or complete lies.

If that's what makes you horny, then carry on.

Sorry man, but you move the goalposts and dismiss pretty much anything that doesn’t fit your narrative as a lefty source.

Are you not being dishonest and doing what you accuse me of by taking a few snippets and immediately assuming I’m liberal?

Here’s the irony. I voted for DJT twice and tend to vote Republican unless the candidate is a total $hitbird. I’m not a big fan, but he was better than the alternative, twice. I’m not far right and at most center-right the other way. But that does not mean that Trump is my ride or die and I take what he says as the gospel. I‘m a big fan of Desantis and would vote for him all day, every day over Trump.

I don’t buy into Trump being this beacon of integrity and the savior of the little guy. He’s just better at making people think he is. None of them are above criticism. They are ALL lying and manipulating for power, greed, self-preservation and their own interests. That is not exclusive to one party or the other.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Sorry man, but you move the goalposts and dismiss pretty much anything that doesn’t fit your narrative as a lefty source.

Interesting comment from a guy that's been posting here a day. Do you realize you just did the same thing you accused me of AND in the same sentence? LOL

I've only seen you source Pew Research and Reuters. Both are known to be slanted to the left.

Are you not being dishonest and doing what you accuse me of by taking a few snippets and immediately assuming I’m liberal?

Here’s the irony. I voted for DJT twice and tend to vote Republican unless the candidate is a total $hitbird.

And the reality is, you are about the 50th poster that's come here out of nowhere, immediately starts slamming Trump, but gives us the 'hey I'm not a liberal, i voted for him twice' line.

I mean maybe the 51st guy is telling the truth, but I'm gonna assume he's just like the 50 that came before him.

 

[RayGravesGhost]

malone translation: If you criticize trump you can't be a republican or conservative

If you don't cite Newsmax, RedState, OAN, the Gateway Pundit, & Fox News as your news sources then you're a lefty communist

armbar is NOT PURE ENOUGH !!!

 

[Sunburnt Indian]

Chapter 4, Summer of Violence is good reading in Rigged by Mollie Hemingway. Many, many judges just aren't interested in the mountains of vote fraud evidence available to all of us. A judge shows interest and his home address becomes available to the Antifa and BLM arms of the former Democrat Party.

Biden is illegitimate. Anyone who has slept through a course in physics knows it.

 

[BamaFan1137]

malone translation: If you criticize trump you can't be a republican or conservative

If you don't cite Newsmax, RedState, OAN, the Gateway Pundit, & Fox News as your news sources then you're a lefty communist

armbar is NOT PURE ENOUGH !!!

Buy a mirror. You do the exact same thing in the opposite direction, genius.

 

[RayGravesGhost]

I do?

Please show me where I've challenged anyone's party affiliation because they've criticized Biden?

Hell, show me where I've challenged anyone's party affiliation?

I call you a trumpanzee (which you are) but have I said you're not a republican?
Have I said you're not a conservative?

And that's the easy example since we have differing political viewpoints

The trumpanzees here do it to other conservative republicans
They attack their own for not being loyal enough to trump

Do you see anyone from the progressive side here attacking other democrats for not being loyal enough to Biden?

Doesn't happen


This is just ANOTHER perfect example of conservative lying around here

1. They believe in party (or demagogue) over country/democracy

2. They love to make false equivalency claims that "everyone else does what they do". No, everyone else doesn't.


Please show us where I've questioned someone else's political affiliation or claimed someone was lying about theirs because of some 50 imaginary posters that came before them

 

[BCSpell]

This is so dishonest and the left ALWAYS does this. Whenever bad behavior is highlighted on their side, they NEVER admit it, they ALWAYS attempt to project that the 'other side' is just as bad, so their bad behavior is actually standard behavior.

No, I wouldn't lie about the results, because if I did, it would be painfully easy to set the record straight, as I did here with you.

What YOU should be doing is focusing on why you were lied to. And ask yourself 'Ok, if they lied to me about this, have they lied to me about anything else?'

Unless of course, you just love hearing bad stories about Trump, and could care less if they are rooted in reality, or complete lies.

If that's what makes you horny, then carry on.

Kind of like the lie someone else on here keeps spreading about 400 Classified Documents found. They seem to forget that Trump had a standing order to de-classify thousands of documents.

Funny how the DOJ wants to keep everything secret, is fighting to keep the Warrant and Affidavit from being released, refusing to produce an accurate list of documents and items seized, BUT yet, they keep leaking things they think will make Trump look bad to the MSM. Just plain FUNNY.

 

[RayGravesGhost]

Kind of like the lie someone else on here keeps spreading about 400 Classified Documents found. They seem to forget that Trump had a standing order to de-classify thousands of documents.

The 3 charges in trump search warrant have nothing to do with classification so he could have declassified the entire government if he liked

This has been explained 1000x times...
How dense is that thing you call your skull? 🤣

Funny how the DOJ wants to keep everything secret, is fighting to keep the Warrant and Affidavit from being released, refusing to produce an accurate list of documents and items seized, BUT yet, they keep leaking things they think will make Trump look bad to the MSM. Just plain FUNNY.

Newsflash...the DOJ is SUPPOSED to keep everything secret when investigating that's actually to the suspect's benefit

Now we know you don't understand how the DOJ is supposed to work because you're a trumpanzee but its OK

donald trump has screwed up again...

His court filing for a special master which has been thrown back in his face with questions for trump to answer to the judge

DOJ will have PLENTY of opportunity to speak thru court filings to whatever it wants about this investigation

 

[Capt Ron 1]

Newsflash...the DOJ is SUPPOSED to keep everything secret when investigating that's actually to the suspect's benefit

Then why is the NYT and Washington post reporting stories multiple times a day, son?