If you think the polls are wrong...

[Uniformed_ReRe]

You should read this:

Yes, the Polls Could Be Wrong. but That Could Help Biden, Not Just Trump

This article was originally published at nbcnews.com on October 27, 2020

cookpolitical.com

He does a good job of explaining that, while there is some truth to the recent criticism of polling, especially in Florida and the Midwest, Trump is still likely underperforming compared to 2016.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

You should read this:

Yes, the Polls Could Be Wrong. but That Could Help Biden, Not Just Trump

This article was originally published at nbcnews.com on October 27, 2020

cookpolitical.com

He does a good job of explaining that, while there is some truth to the recent criticism of polling, especially in Florida and the Midwest, Trump is still likely underperforming compared to 2016.

We have early and mail-in voting numbers now. Polls are meaningless at this point.

And Cook Political is known liberal. Come on, man!

 

[nail1988]

We have early and mail-in voting numbers now. Polls are meaningless at this point.

And Cook Political is known liberal. Come on, man!

Cook is DC swamp creature who has bet the farm on a blue wave using the #Fakepolls. Ths clown did the same thing in 2016

Here's What Early Voting Numbers Are Telling Us

After 2016, it’s hard to have a lot of faith in the polls, so the question is, how do we assess the state of the race? In 2016, most state polls were as bad as national polls, and cherrypicking...

pjmedia.com

 

[kjfreeze]

Well remember around this time Killary had a 99% chance of winning.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Like I said, we have actual vote numbers now, polls are irrelevant.

 

[jfegaly]

Better yet, if you think they are right, you have been asleep for a couple decades

 

[Sunburnt Indian]

Better yet, if you think they are right, you have been asleep for a couple decades

Or you can't clearly define math's simplest equation.

 

[BlueEyedGator17]

You should read this:

Yes, the Polls Could Be Wrong. but That Could Help Biden, Not Just Trump

This article was originally published at nbcnews.com on October 27, 2020

cookpolitical.com

He does a good job of explaining that, while there is some truth to the recent criticism of polling, especially in Florida and the Midwest, Trump is still likely underperforming compared to 2016.

lol. Omg! Trump underperforming??? Please! He’s killing it. More than 2016 will be voting for Trump. Landslide!

 

[IrishPokerDog]

You should read this:

Yes, the Polls Could Be Wrong. but That Could Help Biden, Not Just Trump

This article was originally published at nbcnews.com on October 27, 2020

cookpolitical.com

He does a good job of explaining that, while there is some truth to the recent criticism of polling, especially in Florida and the Midwest, Trump is still likely underperforming compared to 2016.

not according to IBD/Tipp..... their latest shows only a 4 point lead by Biden; less than the deficit Trump had in 2016

 

[fatman76]

There seems to be a whole lot of gaslighting going on with these polls. On social media, the news media, etc. one can see much more tangible support for Trump than for Biden. All across the country I see and hear anecdotal evidence of Trump support that conflicts with what is being reported by (most of) the various pollsters.

This past Saturday, I drove across the river to Kentucky to visit my parents and my brother visiting from out of town. Along the way, I passed by the Evansville riverfront, where there was a citizens Trump rally of about 200 people. You just don't see that kind of support for Biden.

Maybe it's the "shy" Trump voters who don't want to tell pollsters they're voting for Trump. Maybe there really is a huge silent army of Biden voters who will take down Trump. Maybe these pollsters and the media that report on their numbers are trying to discourage and suppress the conservative vote. Maybe these poll numbers will be used as a pretext to frame Trump as cheating his way to a second term should he get re-elected.

In summary, I think Trump probably loses the popular vote, but ekes out an electoral college win. I also believe that if Trump is re-elected, these pollsters need to be held to public scrutiny, and frankly shouldn't be trusted going forward.

It's more liberal hypocrisy. They throw a fit when you try to force in person voting, require an ID, etc. that the R's are interested in suppressing the vote.

But when polls intentionally skew their results, that's another form of suppressing the vote. Their goal is to discourage opposition voters. No one wants to go vote for a loser, or waste their time.

The dead giveaway is the rapid surge by R's in these polls as we get closer to the election. There simply aren't that many swing/undecided voters out there to cause such shifts (especially if the polling methodology doesn't change). These "surges" are pollsters trying to save face because all that matters is what they predict right before we vote.

 

[instaGATOR]

Trump in a landslide, just like I've been saying for months now.... iG 🤓

When someone calls me a BRAINWASHED CONSERVATIVE....
I wonder if it was:

~ The Lefty school teachers?

~ The Lefty professors?

~ The Lefty fake news media?

~ The Lefty Hollywood entertainment?

~ The Lefty celebrities?

~ Or the Lefty social media platforms that did it????
==========

"Why do you keep on posting things that you know will trigger people?"

Me -- Cause Ph,,,k'em, that why....

 

[Uniformed_ReRe]

View embedded media

View embedded media

Like I said, we have actual vote numbers now, polls are irrelevant.

The people you are quoting from Twitter are using TargetSmart as their source for turnout stats.

Yet the actual CEO of TargetSmart seems awfully confident that Trump is not doing well.

 

[fatman76]

The people you are quoting from Twitter are using TargetSmart as their source for turnout stats.

Yet the actual CEO of TargetSmart seems awfully confident that Trump is not doing well.

View embedded media

You're talking about a 9% advantage of a total surge of 1.7MM voters. That's 159k votes in a state Trump won by 1.17MM votes in 2016.

And you're also assuming there are zero registered D's voting for Trump. Polling at Trump's rallies have shown 15-30% registered D's, so that's a shaky assumption at best.

And no where did he say Trump isn't doing well in FL, he just provided a data point and explained it.

 

[gator1776]

You're talking about a 9% advantage of a total surge of 1.7MM voters. That's 159k votes in a state Trump won by 1.17MM votes in 2016.

And you're also assuming there are zero registered D's voting for Trump. Polling at Trump's rallies have shown 15-30% registered D's, so that's a shaky assumption at best.

And no where did he say Trump isn't doing well in FL, he just provided a data point and explained it.

FACTS AND REASON HAVE NO PLACE IN THIS DOJO

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

The people you are quoting from Twitter are using TargetSmart as their source for turnout stats.

Yet the actual CEO of TargetSmart seems awfully confident that Trump is not doing well.

View embedded media

You do know TargetSmart is what Hiden is using as well, right?

The numbers speak for themselves.