….(pick your reason why), you: a) fire Stricklin and b) go hire a hot shot OC/QB coach for a fraction of the cost and tell Napier that if he doesn’t like it, he can resign and forgo his buyout.
For two years, I have said that Napier needs to be a CEO and not an OC and that he has been mediocre at best since Clemson. We have seen that prove to be true.
If you get Lane, then disregard, but part of our issue here is that there are not a lot of great candidates and you have a ridiculous buyout.
If the OC is all that, then he can replace Napier after 1-2 years. If he’s all that than Napier can focus on the thousand other things that weigh on a modern HC.
The key difference here is telling Napier versus suggesting. And firing SS to show that lack of results and poor contracts have consequences.
For two years, I have said that Napier needs to be a CEO and not an OC and that he has been mediocre at best since Clemson. We have seen that prove to be true.
If you get Lane, then disregard, but part of our issue here is that there are not a lot of great candidates and you have a ridiculous buyout.
If the OC is all that, then he can replace Napier after 1-2 years. If he’s all that than Napier can focus on the thousand other things that weigh on a modern HC.
The key difference here is telling Napier versus suggesting. And firing SS to show that lack of results and poor contracts have consequences.
