I just heard something on Newsmax
- Thread starter kjfreeze
- Start date
Apparently Michigan had a dude born in 1850 that voted.
In person. I mean, if you're gonna cheat, go all out!
wtf are you talking about? I've never looted entire cities, nor firebombed a police car. You’ve lost it.
In fact, I have a Back the Blue sign in my yard.
Hubris is a representative term for someone who states he, if president, would do the things you stated you would do. It's not an insult.
I would venture to say someone looking for an insult so he can feel insulted could be termed a "snowflake".
Nope, I know what I’ve done. Like Trump, he’s making claims he can’t back up. A sure sign of desperation.
Cognative dissonance is the thinking the only way Trump can lose is by cheating. Nothing to do with his divisive rhetoric, mishandling the pandemic, 20 million out of work, etc.
These continual claims of cheating are just ridiculous. The implication is that somehow the Democrats are in charge of the nation's elections, and that every single one of the tens of thousands of election workers are part of a massive conspiracy to get rid of Trump and they are all keeping silent about it. Three seconds thought about these claims would show just how implausible this scenario is. Why we can't get these Republicans to give three seconds thought, I just don't know.
They are just desperate. They are so used to taking orders from Trump, they just repeat what he says without even thinking about whether or not it makes sense.
Trump out laid the gameplan even before election day. I warned these people that he wasn’t going to leave gracefully and they all said, no way. It’s now playing out.
Frankly, I’m enjoying their reaction. I cant wait to see them drag Trumps fat ass out of the WH kicking and screaming.
My stupid comment was a reply to your stupid comment. Felt obvious...you've lost it.
Why won't PA mail in vote counters let Republicans have an up close look at vote counting? If all is up and up, vote counters should welcome such.
If dems didnt cheat then they should mind us investigating them for cheating.
Precisely. Dems throw poll watchers out, board up windows and say they are done counting. Then at 4am they 'find' more ballots, count in darkness, then in morning when everyone wakes up, they announce the results.
Happened in WI. Happened in MI. Happened in GA. Happened in PA. And just announced that it happened last night in NV.
Guys when Trump is certified, please remember to focus your anger on the cheaters. And not the people who exposed the cheating.
Pa should be your guide. PASC said to count all ballots. Law says count qualified ballots. Your worker does not have to be corrupt but be given the wrong directions. i.e. Dont worry about ballots just count votes. So if and when SCOTUS says Pa law overrides the desires of the PASC many of these ballots will be thrown out for failure to match sigs, late postmarks, arriving after 8pm on Nov3, missing postmarks (cause dems manufactured them and they did not get mailed but dumped), voter role matching, dead persons names on ballots etc. Biden needed mail -in Trump did not so any ballots thrown out will help Trump regain Pa.
Sorry you don't overcome a 650K lead on election night without something odd if not cheating going on.
Now Ga I dont know but if any election law was ignored then Trump may bet some mail-ins thrown out there as well.
This the hanging chads all over again with the intent to bend election law to favor democrats and their cheating.
AND if its true and enough honest postmen come forward under oath and claim that their postmaster ordered backdating postmarks then then all the mail in ballots are spoiled and will have to be thrown out.
If it goes down this way there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth by honest voters who got disenfranchised by cheaters.
You overcome a 650K lead after election night when you told your side that the pandemic is real and to vote by mail for their safety. So if Democrats voted by mail and Republicans didn't, it sort of follows that there would a) be more mail in votes for the Democrats, and b) fewer Democratic votes on election night, as they were all sent by mail. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
BTW, Trump could still win Ga, after the mail-in ballots, they have to do the provisional ballots and they may not have done the military ballots yet either, although they could have been lumped in with the other mail-in ballots and counted. Not sure on their process there.
Because statistically nobody is winning ~80% of anything anywhere.
BTW Hiden now has a small lead in Georgia. Roughly 9,000 military ballots were left last night, which would put Trump back in the lead.
Shockingly...those ballots seems to have disappeared. I'm sure they will be 'found' soon.
Shockingly...those ballots seems to have disappeared. I'm sure they will be 'found' soon.
Talked to Nail by phone and he claims military ballots not due until 12th and usually go pub by high percentage.
Not due until 12th, doesn't mean most of them haven't already been received and counted. But if they have been set aside, that's fine. All votes count, and they will all be counted.
PS: I already know they lean Republican, which is why I brought them up. But let me ask you, if they are 80% Republican, is that possible, you know, statistically?
in such a small subset yeah ...hyperbole aside of me saying anywhere.Not due until 12th, doesn't mean most of them haven't already been received and counted. But if they have been set aside, that's fine. All votes count, and they will all be counted.
PS: I already know they lean Republican, which is why I brought them up. But let me ask you, if they are 80% Republican, is that possible, you know, statistically?
In a large group of ~ 1M mail-ins not likely or probable at all. Maybe 60-40 at best with Trump winning by ~50K.
But lets see those mail-ins that didn't qualify. Maybe its a small number and Biden wins. Maybe enough get thrown out to put Trump ahead again.
Only if there is a recount. There will be one in Georgia, not sure about Penn. And if he keeps Arizona and Nevada, even Penn won't matter.
Try to understand that the checkers are checking the ballots. They are checking signatures, etc. If they pass muster the first time, they will certainly pass muster the second. Don't expect more than a couple hundred difference in a recount, there never is.
Whistleblowers in two states (MI and PA) have come forward and will go on oath that their supervisors told them to backdate all mail-in ballots received after November 3rd.
Could be recounts in all contested states. If the dems didn't cheat, then they should be fine with this.
