I just heard something on Newsmax

[kjfreeze]

I wished I would have recorded it, but they had a constitutional attorney on there that said when the Pennsylvania supreme court made the decision they did and the US Supreme Court upheld it (thanks to John Roberts) that it was incorrect. The courts don't decide voting, the legislation does. So that concept of allowing votes past the deadline will be stopped by the US Supreme Court. Anybody have any news about this?

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

So the SC will overturn itself?

Rs are saying count all the legal votes.

Ds want to count ALL the votes, legal or not.

One party is the party of law and order, and one party is the party of cheaters.

 

[Uniformed_ReRe]

The ruling is not that they should accept ballots that were sent late, but that they should not assume without a preponderance of evidence that ballots received after polls closed were actually sent late. The underlying rule itself was not changed.

Either way, Biden’s margin of victory in PA will likely be large enough to make this issue irrelevant.

 

[LizardGrad89]

The ruling is not that they should accept ballots that were sent late, but that they should not assume without a preponderance of evidence that ballots received after polls closed were actually sent late. The underlying rule itself was not changed.

Either way, Biden’s margin of victory in PA will likely be large enough to make this issue irrelevant.

Any postmark on election day is not late. It was election day, you voted. It's fair to not count them if they come in after the final tally has been certified, you could never certify an election if you had to wait for every single vote. There could always be one more out there.

All the efforts Trump made to ruin the post office so that ballots would be delayed, all because he thought he could stand at the podium on election night and say "I'm the President, and I say the voting is over, and I won". But then he found out that he couldn't do that. Well actually, he COULD, because he DID, but then he found out that he was going to be ignored. Too funny.

 

[DCandtheUTBand]

Yes I believe I posted about this. This was last BEFORE the election and before ACB took her seat. It was 4-4. PASC wants to count all ballots but the SC court will probably go 5-4 and say only valid ballots can be counted. They will need proper postmarks and signature matching.

IF while cheating MI and WI did anything obviously illegal or contrary to procedure then some of the cheating will be thwarted.

So lets hope MI and WI have large numbers of harvested ballots and no postmarks. Lets hope their law requires a post mark and signature verification. Lets also hope that the low IQ dem voters screwed up their ballots and most get tossed. Mail in was always about cheating so I have little sympathy

. <---my violin for any thrown out.

 

[LizardGrad89]

Yes I believe I posted about this. This was last BEFORE the election and before ACB took her seat. It was 4-4. PASC wants to count all ballots but the SC court will probably go 5-4 and say only valid ballots can be counted. They will need proper postmarks and signature matching.

IF while cheating MI and WI did anything obviously illegal or contrary to procedure then some of the cheating will be thwarted.

So lets hope MI and WI have large numbers of harvested ballots and no postmarks. Lets hope their law requires a post mark and signature verification. Lets also hope that the low IQ dem voters screwed up their ballots and most get tossed. Mail in was always about cheating so I have little sympathy

. <---my violin for any thrown out.

Mail-in was always about COVID.

Accept that MI and WI went blue.

Republicans always claim voter fraud. Then no voter fraud is found. Does that deter them? Nope. Next time, any election they don't win? Voter fraud. Too funny.

 

[LizardGrad89]

Yes I believe I posted about this. This was last BEFORE the election and before ACB took her seat. It was 4-4. PASC wants to count all ballots but the SC court will probably go 5-4 and say only valid ballots can be counted. They will need proper postmarks and signature matching.

IF while cheating MI and WI did anything obviously illegal or contrary to procedure then some of the cheating will be thwarted.

So lets hope MI and WI have large numbers of harvested ballots and no postmarks. Lets hope their law requires a post mark and signature verification. Lets also hope that the low IQ dem voters screwed up their ballots and most get tossed. Mail in was always about cheating so I have little sympathy

. <---my violin for any thrown out.

"Let's hope the low IQ Dems screwed their ballots and most get tossed".

This is hilarious on several levels. First, that you are willing to disenfranchise anyone who doesn't agree with you. Ethics much? Second, the Republicans have just as many low IQ types on their side as the Dems do, actually a lot more. It's not a coincidence that the better a state's educational system is, the bluer it votes.

 

[DCandtheUTBand]

just because something is ignored does not mean it does not exist.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Any postmark on election day is not late.

You think that includes an Election Day postmark that's put on there AFTER Election Day?

Keep watching...

 

[LizardGrad89]

just because something is ignored does not mean it does not exist.

OK, so despite the checks in the system, the audits, the independent commissions that review everything, the fact that election officials are themselves elected and so the position changes over all the time, but nobody ever comes out and says "I found all this fraud by my predecessor", you KNOW there is fraud. YOU know this. Because why? What information do you have that NOBODY involved with actual elections has? Dying to hear this one.

 

[DCandtheUTBand]

"Let's hope the low IQ Dems screwed their ballots and most get tossed".

This is hilarious on several levels. First, that you are willing to disenfranchise anyone who doesn't agree with you. Ethics much? Second, the Republicans have just as many low IQ types on their side as the Dems do, actually a lot more. It's not a coincidence that the better a state's educational system is, the bluer it votes.

LOL...yeah indoctrination is why they are more blue. Oh you confuse me for a democrat! I an a republican...I believe in a democratic republic not a democracy. If some one actively want to over turn that then yeah I am glad when their ignorant @ss gets disenfranchised. They are a threat to my way of life and f&ck them.

You mistake me for the RINOs and Milquetoast pubs who play by Marquees of Qeeunsbury rules. Homey don't play that . I am a Lee Atwater type and any dirty trick is good for me as long as its legal. Democrats pols are evil, corrupt SOBs and to be defeated not compromised with.

While I am not a loudmouth cad dems are lucky I was not POTUS. I would make Trump look like a choir boy and I would have had PI s digging up dirt and handing over to Barr on all my enemies and many would have been indicted by now. Nixon would have been a piker compared to me. I would follow the law though while running through democrats like Sherman's march to the sea.

I hate dem pols like you TDS guys hate Trump. But my hate has been for a lot longer and is based on rational thought.

Hope we are clear.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

OK, so despite the checks in the system, the audits, the independent commissions that review everything, the fact that election officials are themselves elected and so the position changes over all the time, but nobody ever comes out and says "I found all this fraud by my predecessor", you KNOW there is fraud. YOU know this. Because why? What information do you have that NOBODY involved with actual elections has? Dying to hear this one.

Why do dems always shit their pants when someone mentions voter fraud? If you didn't commit voter fraud then you shouldn't care if we investigate. That was the standard when the Trump-Russia investigation happened.

What changed?

 

[jfegaly]

OK, so despite the checks in the system, the audits, the independent commissions that review everything, the fact that election officials are themselves elected and so the position changes over all the time, but nobody ever comes out and says "I found all this fraud by my predecessor", you KNOW there is fraud. YOU know this. Because why? What information do you have that NOBODY involved with actual elections has? Dying to hear this one.

no voter fraud EVER found?

https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/docs/pacei-voterfraudcases.pdf

 

[goldmom]

The ruling is not that they should accept ballots that were sent late, but that they should not assume without a preponderance of evidence that ballots received after polls closed were actually sent late. The underlying rule itself was not changed.

Either way, Biden’s margin of victory in PA will likely be large enough to make this issue irrelevant.

You mean with or without "legal" ballots? When did "illegal" ballots become irrelevant?

 

[gator1776]

You mean with or without "legal" ballots? When did "illegal" ballots become irrelevant?

When Biden took the lead 🤣🤣

 

[GatorTheo]

It's freakin' ridiculous we have to worry about this. We have the technology to do much better. We need picture ID and vote in person electronically. We can even have mobile voting units to go to the neighborhoods. And each location is manned by observers from both parties.

 

[fsumc]

In Wisconsin the head of elections official was adamant everything was on the up and up and encouraged everyone who was skeptical to go and observe the process for themselves. Right next door in Michigan people attempt to do so and windows are taped up and legitimate poll watchers are kicked out. In Philadelphia the poll watchers are kicked out or stood 25 to 100 feet away. People have every right to be suspicious, especially with astronomically high voter turnout numbers that have never been seen before.

it’s amazing how Florida went from the laughing stock of running an election to being the example of how it should be run. Knowing how many votes are out and full transparency. It’s really not as difficult as these other states are pretending it is. “Oh but COVID!!!” LOL

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

It's freakin' ridiculous we have to worry about this. We have the technology to do much better. We need picture ID and vote in person electronically. We can even have mobile voting units to go to the neighborhoods. And each location is manned by observers from both parties.

This election is a perfect example of why dems always fight Voter ID. Because it makes cheating for more difficult.

 

[Sunburnt Indian]

Where does a circle begin and where does it end?
Clearly define math's simplest equation?
Name the 3 lowest hard metric numbers.

Every "low IQ" conservative here can answer these 3 questions.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

“Oh but COVID!!!” LOL

Have we noticed how dems and media suddenly don't give a shit about covid?

As many said, it magically cured itself on November 4th.

 

[gatordad3]

Have we noticed how dems and media suddenly don't give a shit about covid?

As many said, it magically cured itself on November 4th.

I can't remember who but someone very significant to the libs actually said using covid for mail in voting is inexcusable.

 

[gator1776]

Have we noticed how dems and media suddenly don't give a shit about covid?

As many said, it magically cured itself on November 4th.

I’ve been telling people for months that Covid Will suddenly become what is after election day, nasty little mild pandemic that unfortunately will take some of our elderly just like all viral pandemics do every couple of years. It is a nasty one then I got to tell you. Mostly just because it’s new to our immune system’s and every day of the mortality rate goes down and every day it becomes less and less of a problem just like we all knew it would.

 

[jfegaly]

They are finding discrepancies everywhere.

Donna Brydges born in 1901 voted via absentee ballot in Mason County Michigan. That would make her 119 years old

June Aiken born 1900 voted via absentee ballot in Jackson County Michigan. 120 years old. But hey, lets count EVERY vote and not EVERY legal vote

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

They are finding discrepancies everywhere.

Donna Brydges born in 1901 voted via absentee ballot in Mason County Michigan. That would make her 119 years old

June Aiken born 1900 voted via absentee ballot in Jackson County Michigan. 120 years old. But hey, lets count EVERY vote and not EVERY legal vote

Come on, man!

 

[Uniformed_ReRe]

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

 

[Uniformed_ReRe]

View embedded media

This is what I meant by “crackpot.”

 

[kjfreeze]

Mail-in was always about COVID.

Accept that MI and WI went blue.

Republicans always claim voter fraud. Then no voter fraud is found. Does that deter them? Nope. Next time, any election they don't win? Voter fraud. Too funny.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

This is what I meant by “crackpot.”

You think it's crackpot because you don't think the dems are cheating.

*I* think that is crackpot.

 

[LizardGrad89]

LOL...yeah indoctrination is why they are more blue. Oh you confuse me for a democrat! I an a republican...I believe in a democratic republic not a democracy. If some one actively want to over turn that then yeah I am glad when their ignorant @ss gets disenfranchised. They are a threat to my way of life and f&ck them.

You mistake me for the RINOs and Milquetoast pubs who play by Marquees of Qeeunsbury rules. Homey don't play that . I am a Lee Atwater type and any dirty trick is good for me as long as its legal. Democrats pols are evil, corrupt SOBs and to be defeated not compromised with.

While I am not a loudmouth cad dems are lucky I was not POTUS. I would make Trump look like a choir boy and I would have had PI s digging up dirt and handing over to Barr on all my enemies and many would have been indicted by now. Nixon would have been a piker compared to me. I would follow the law though while running through democrats like Sherman's march to the sea.

I hate dem pols like you TDS guys hate Trump. But my hate has been for a lot longer and is based on rational thought.

Hope we are clear.

I have never confused you with a democrat. You are the epitome of a know it all Republican.

You talk like Trump talked, and you seem to be under the same delusion, that the president is a king who can do as he pleases. You'd go thought the Democrats like Sherman. LOL, The word for that is hubris.

Oh, and BTW, nobody believes in a true democracy. We would have to vote on every rule and law change, and everything else our governmental representatives now deal with. No I believe in a representative democracy, where everyone has a vote, and all votes count the same (the democracy part), towards choosing our representatives (the representative part), not with some "intermediate" level of voters who actually vote for the president, and we are voting for the voters.

Question: Are you a religious person? Because if you are against "indoctrination", you cannot be a religious man, because nobody indoctrinators the young like a religion.

 

[jfegaly]

I have never confused you with a democrat. You are the epitome of a know it all Republican.

You talk like Trump talked, and you seem to be under the same delusion, that the president is a king who can do as he pleases. You'd go thought the Democrats like Sherman. LOL, The word for that is hubris.

Oh, and BTW, nobody believes in a true democracy. We would have to vote on every rule and law change, and everything else our governmental representatives now deal with. No I believe in a representative democracy, where everyone has a vote, and all votes count the same (the democracy part), towards choosing our representatives (the representative part), not with some "intermediate" level of voters who actually vote for the president, and we are voting for the voters.

Question: Are you a religious person? Because if you are against "indoctrination", you cannot be a religious man, because nobody indoctrinators the young like a religion.

Quack quack quack

 

[DCandtheUTBand]

I have never confused you with a democrat. You are the epitome of a know it all Republican.

You talk like Trump talked, and you seem to be under the same delusion, that the president is a king who can do as he pleases. You'd go thought the Democrats like Sherman. LOL, The word for that is hubris.

Oh, and BTW, nobody believes in a true democracy. We would have to vote on every rule and law change, and everything else our governmental representatives now deal with. No I believe in a representative democracy, where everyone has a vote, and all votes count the same (the democracy part), towards choosing our representatives (the representative part), not with some "intermediate" level of voters who actually vote for the president, and we are voting for the voters.

Question: Are you a religious person? Because if you are against "indoctrination", you cannot be a religious man, because nobody indoctrinators the young like a religion.

First I am a conservative who votes republican.

I believe on our form of republican government. I strongly support the electoral college.

Yes I favor conservatism being taught to our young. I did not say I opposed indoctrination but that public schools indoctrinate with left leaning values. Its why I sent/send my kids to private school.

LOL president as king? You mean Trump rightfully stepping aside to let governors run their states during COVID while Biden has said he would unconstitutionally lockdown the USoA via executive order?

You mean zer0's DACA edict? Or the many other pen and phone edicts emanating from his anal orifice.

Tell ya one thing if Chinese Joe and his ho win, a lot of lawyers will be getting rich over the next 2-4 years because Mitch will shut it down and every EO springing from Medimucil Joes arse will be in court.

I hope I am writing thank yous to ACB.

Hubris well that was zer0. As for me I am not POTUS and that was the qualifier. If I was then it would not be hubris it would be a mission to protect this country from its domestic enemy the demon Rat party.

 

[Sunburnt Indian]

Where does a circle begin and where does it end?
Clearly define math's simplest equation?
Name the 3 lowest hard metric numbers.

Every "low IQ" conservative here can answer these 3 questions.

I put this on display because someone said there are as many low IQ among Republicans as Democrats. This is not true. Far more Democrats fall below the mean 98 IQ U.S average. I clearly defined math's simplest equation for one here. Where I failed miserably? Getting through to him was completely beyond my reach.

 

[BSC911]

First I am a conservative who votes republican.

I believe on our form of republican government. I strongly support the electoral college.

Yes I favor conservatism being taught to our young. I did not say I opposed indoctrination but that public schools indoctrinate with left leaning values. Its why I sent/send my kids to private school.

LOL president as king? You mean Trump rightfully stepping aside to let governors run their states during COVID while Biden has said he would unconstitutionally lockdown the USoA via executive order?

You mean zer0's DACA edict? Or the many other pen and phone edicts emanating from his anal orifice.

Tell ya one thing if Chinese Joe and his ho win, a lot of lawyers will be getting rich over the next 2-4 years because Mitch will shut it down and every EO springing from Medimucil Joes arse will be in court.

I hope I am writing thank yous to ACB.

Hubris well that was zer0. As for me I am not POTUS and that was the qualifier. If I was then it would not be hubris it would be a mission to protect this country from its domestic enemy the demon Rat party.

You seem really committed. I think you should take up arms.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Yall noting the change in tone of the sheep ITT? They've gone from giddy and braggadocios this morning to angry and pissy now. ReRe even left the board in a huff and said he wasnt coming back LOL

This is nothing, the meltdowns are on the way and will be glorious LOL

 

[BamaFan1137]

I have never confused you with a democrat. You are the epitome of a know it all Republican.

You calling someone else a know it all...intentional or not, that's freaking hilarious.

 

[BamaFan1137]

You seem really committed. I think you should take up arms.

Like how you looted entire cities and firebombed police cars?

 

[gator1776]

I have never confused you with a democrat. You are the epitome of a know it all Republican.

You talk like Trump talked, and you seem to be under the same delusion, that the president is a king who can do as he pleases. You'd go thought the Democrats like Sherman. LOL, The word for that is hubris.

Oh, and BTW, nobody believes in a true democracy. We would have to vote on every rule and law change, and everything else our governmental representatives now deal with. No I believe in a representative democracy, where everyone has a vote, and all votes count the same (the democracy part), towards choosing our representatives (the representative part), not with some "intermediate" level of voters who actually vote for the president, and we are voting for the voters.

Question: Are you a religious person? Because if you are against "indoctrination", you cannot be a religious man, because nobody indoctrinators the young like a religion.

Says the guy that can’t have a discussion without insulting somebody.

 

[LinksGator]

Dems.............votes are corrupted by Putin, we need to control.

Republicans...................can you check on that ballot from 127 year old in Michigan, it might be an issue.By the way she was not Russian?

 

[LinksGator]

Biden wants a LID on Arizona and Nevada.