Hows that Bondi hire?

[RussellCasse]

Pretty simple questions now for the entire board.

Do you think Pam handled the binder release well?

Did she say she had flight logs?
Dis she say names will be coming out tomorrow? (2 weeks ago)

Seems like a simple exercise to prove if you are correct about her being an honest broker, and not a liar that fumbled the issue.

Let the excuses begin. Should tell us who has the ability to be honest on here.

 

[gatordad3]

View embedded media

Damn! Trump also hires the hot women, unlike Biden, who appoints Sam Brinton, Rachel Levine, and Jen Psaki.

 

[Capt Ron 1]

Yes. SCAM Bondi jumped the gun. She said she had the documents on her desk. That she had flight logs ON HER DESK.

She lied. It is what it is.

Or are you saying she handled the release well?

If so, maybe you will be next on retard finders list.

Pretty simple Ron. Post the flight logs she had on her desk that she said would be released 2 weeks ago. Otherwise, she lied AND jumped the gun.

My challenge to you.

Did she say she had flight logs on her desk?
Did she say names would be coming out tomorrow (2 weeks ago)?

If so, show the board the logs and the names. Otherwise, go sit in the corner and pipe down.



Whatever comes out will be “redacted” for “National Security” reasons. In other words, they are going to protect people, and they need time to block out politicians names.

View embedded media

I have been CRYSTAL CLEAR on my position. Let me remind you AGAIN. 1. I TRUST TRUMP. 2. Mabe she is who you say she is....we will see. But if she is, she will be gone so fast her head will spin. 3. If rule #2 bothers you , refer back to rule #1

 

[instaGATOR]

Here's the kind of stuff that dear ole HustleCeasee never wants to know about Pam...

 

[RussellCasse]

Damn it feels good to be a gangster….and right again. Scam Bondi is a fraud.

 

[RussellCasse]

I have been CRYSTAL CLEAR on my position. Let me remind you AGAIN. 1. I TRUST TRUMP. 2. Mabe she is who you say she is....we will see. But if she is, she will be gone so fast her head will spin. 3. If rule #2 bothers you , refer back to rule #1

I just asked 3 simple questions of you.

1. Did she handle binder gate well?
2. Did she say she had the flight logs on her desk, and if so can you show me those logs she said she would release?
3. Did she say she was going to release names that were in the file on her desk? If so, what are the names?

Seems like a simple task.

 

[nail1988]

This should get real interesting. This was a inside job IMO

 

[Capt Ron 1]

Damn it feels good to be a gangster….and right again. Scam Bondi is a fraud.

View embedded media

My answer is....refer back to rule #1.

 

[Capt Ron 1]

From Alina Habba's Facebook page......

BREAKING: Alina Habba CONFIRMS that they are reviewing the Epstein Docs and prosecutions are actually coming.

"I just asked about this and where it's at, and I just want to say I understand and hear the American people's ask, and sometimes they mistakenly put it on me, and that's fine. I'm part of the administration, but I will say that I personally have checked in. They are going through it. You have to be patient because when you are wanting to prosecute and actually do something with the information that you have, you have to make sure that you save the integrity of the investigations so that we can bring these people to justice, so that we can hold grand juries, so that we can do certain things. You have to be careful.

The value for the American people to know immediately would undercut—you know, we have to do it. We have to expose it, and we're going to be transparent 100%. But we also have to make sure we're not putting any children in danger, putting any minors that don't want and do not deserve to be publicly identified in danger, and making sure that we put forth the information that would still assist us in getting these individuals to justice. It’s such a convoluted thing, but I will tell you, transparency is 100% coming.

We did get a ton of documents. Pam's letter, I think, was directed towards the SDNY, that we now know the individual in charge there had directives to go in, and the FBI said, 'Be the resistance, do not turn over the documents.' We have no tolerance for that. But I would just say to the American people, yes, they got the documents. Kash instructed those individuals that you must cooperate. One resigned, who was leading the charge in not cooperating, and now we have them, and we have to go through them.

There is a very large amount of documents, I've been told. They are going through them, and I also frankly believe in transparency. We have to give the American people transparency, and we have— we have been, frankly. And unfortunately, sometimes we have to wait a little bit to go through the documents; we are not machines. But I know that they are actively working on it."

 

[RussellCasse]

From Alina Habba's Facebook page......

BREAKING: Alina Habba CONFIRMS that they are reviewing the Epstein Docs and prosecutions are actually coming.

"I just asked about this and where it's at, and I just want to say I understand and hear the American people's ask, and sometimes they mistakenly put it on me, and that's fine. I'm part of the administration, but I will say that I personally have checked in. They are going through it. You have to be patient because when you are wanting to prosecute and actually do something with the information that you have, you have to make sure that you save the integrity of the investigations so that we can bring these people to justice, so that we can hold grand juries, so that we can do certain things. You have to be careful.

The value for the American people to know immediately would undercut—you know, we have to do it. We have to expose it, and we're going to be transparent 100%. But we also have to make sure we're not putting any children in danger, putting any minors that don't want and do not deserve to be publicly identified in danger, and making sure that we put forth the information that would still assist us in getting these individuals to justice. It’s such a convoluted thing, but I will tell you, transparency is 100% coming.

We did get a ton of documents. Pam's letter, I think, was directed towards the SDNY, that we now know the individual in charge there had directives to go in, and the FBI said, 'Be the resistance, do not turn over the documents.' We have no tolerance for that. But I would just say to the American people, yes, they got the documents. Kash instructed those individuals that you must cooperate. One resigned, who was leading the charge in not cooperating, and now we have them, and we have to go through them.

There is a very large amount of documents, I've been told. They are going through them, and I also frankly believe in transparency. We have to give the American people transparency, and we have— we have been, frankly. And unfortunately, sometimes we have to wait a little bit to go through the documents; we are not machines. But I know that they are actively working on it."

Still not answering the 3 questions. Why not?

Is pam so stupid that she didn’t realize this would undermine prosecutions when she went on foxnews and said she was releasing the names and logs she claimed were on her desk, then claimed they were not on her desk?

That’s an even bigger indictment on her. As an attorney, she didn’t know her actions would undermine the cases? Holy fook.

Or…she got caught lying. Pretty simple. Nice deflection attempt though.


Now, can you answer those 3 simple questions?

If not, then my point is….on point.

You are ok being gaslit, I am not.

Your non answer IS an answer fwiw.

The lack of common sense and logic is absolutely comical.

 

[kalimgoodman]

I just asked 3 simple questions of you.

1. Did she handle binder gate well?
2. Did she say she had the flight logs on her desk, and if so can you show me those logs she said she would release?
3. Did she say she was going to release names that were in the file on her desk? If so, what are the names?

Seems like a simple task.

You clearly won this debate.....

 

[Capt Ron 1]

Still not answering the 3 questions. Why not?

Is pam so stupid that she didn’t realize this would undermine prosecutions when she went on foxnews and said she was releasing the names and logs she claimed were on her desk, then claimed they were not on her desk?

That’s an even bigger indictment on her. As an attorney, she didn’t know her actions would undermine the cases? Holy fook.

Or…she got caught lying. Pretty simple. Nice deflection attempt though.


Now, can you answer those 3 simple questions?

If not, then my point is….on point.

You are ok being gaslit, I am not.

Your non answer IS an answer fwiw.

The lack of common sense and logic is absolutely comical.

You seem to have small mans syndrome? Maybe just below the belt?

 

[Gator Fever]

I think they will finally have all the stuff they were trying to hide at the SDNY etc. but I am not expecting many prosecutions to be coming from it and I think most of the big names will be names already put out there by some of those victims. Unless Epstein really was recording some of the people and they have that I a don't think this will add much to what is already out there.

 

[kalimgoodman]

I think they will finally have all the stuff they were trying to hide at the SDNY etc. but I am not expecting many prosecutions to be coming from it and I think most of the big names will be names already put out there by some of those victims. Unless Epstein really was recording some of the people and they have that I a don't think this will add much to what is already out there.

Why do you believe that they are hiding stuff?

 

[Gator Fever]

Why do you believe that they are hiding stuff?

Maybe not wanting everything out there about Prince Andrew to come out and not wanting all the high profile names to come out that flew to his island and stayed there.

 

[kalimgoodman]

Maybe not wanting everything out there about Prince Andrew to come out and not wanting all the high profile names to come out that flew to his island and stayed there.

Ok, I am always curious why people go to "stuff is being hidden" when they don't like the info that is released. Sometimes it isn't as "juicy" as we would like.

 

[RussellCasse]

You seem to have small mans syndrome? Maybe just below the belt?

And yet again. You won’t answer the question. I guess you can’t.

A non answer proves my point. Thanks for playing.

 

[RussellCasse]

I think they will finally have all the stuff they were trying to hide at the SDNY etc. but I am not expecting many prosecutions to be coming from it and I think most of the big names will be names already put out there by some of those victims. Unless Epstein really was recording some of the people and they have that I a don't think this will add much to what is already out there.

Bondi really muffed this. Big time. She already said the names and flight logs were on her desk.

There’s a reason she has gone silent and they have sent Habba to try and clean up her mess.

 

[nail1988]