Back to the revolution and not farting tainted sock accounts.
"Article V Convention of States: Backstop against runaway statism
A few years ago, former South Carolina Republican Sen. Jim DeMint said: "The United States is a terminal patient on an unsustainable course. Calling an Article V Convention of States would be too risky not to attempt."
He is more right today than even then...
There is risk in all things in life, but the potential benefit of an Article V Convention of States far outweighs the miniscule risk, as it takes two thirds of states, 34 of 50, just to convene a Convention, and a full three quarters (38 of 50) of all states to amend the Constitution...
In other words, Mason was smart enough to realize that eventually politicians in the national government will abuse the power given to them, and the states and the people would be powerless to stop them. He knew, as should we all, that only saintly men like George Washington would choose to limit his own authority. Congress will never seek to amend the Constitution for the express purpose of limiting itself, nor the Executive or Judicial branches. It must be up to the states and the people to do so...
So we constitutional conservatives are expected to trust the founders' wisdom in all things – except for Article V? Anyone who believes this is neither conservative, nor a constitutionalist."
Brent Smith