Honest debates???
- Thread starter kalimgoodman
- Start date
You don't believe that orange thinks Biden sucks? You don't believe that Trump is being prosecuted based 100% on politics?
I believe that honest is honest and that lies are lies. I don't care that some people refer to optics when reality says something else entirely.
If the Democrats had voted honestly, that single Republicans vote wouldn't have mattered and that white woman would have been expelled as she should have been. That is a hard truth and whether you agree or not, here we are. Screw her and screw the Dems who voted similarly.
Folks, don't be fooled by this bs thread title. I bumped a thread from January on Georgia voter suppression that many of you particpated in. Was that honest debate?
I tried to debate by asking him legitimate questions to which no answers were given or no support for his position. That's why this thread title and any meaning behind it is bs.
I tried to debate by asking him legitimate questions to which no answers were given or no support for his position. That's why this thread title and any meaning behind it is bs.
Last edited:
Orange, I answered the Georgia stuff multiple times. You just got annoyed that I was annoyed about answering it again. I told you to use the search engine to find my response and you think you're too good or something to use the search engine. I don't like answering the same question 1000xs.
There is no such thing as an inappropriate Grogu reference.
Everyone here knows what @kalimgoodman is doing. His thread on Tennessee was his latest race-baiting thread, and the board has had enough of his antics. That's why posters who normally don't say anything started chiming in to call him out.
He started this thread to try to paint himself as the 'victim' cause people can't 'debate' him and are calling him out.
He's being called out for his lies and race-baiting. Period.
Anyone who states their opinion as if it is fact is either pushing an agenda or is a moron who doesn't know the difference. Judging by the general atmosphere we live in where the grifters smell an easy mark in the MAGA extremists, I'd guess the former for this one.- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.youtube.com
So you're saying you don't know the difference between what you just said....and what you just said?
I don't follow. Once again, your tower of intellect is just too advanced for me.You mean by throwing money at something and hoping the bullshit sticks? 😂
Mentioning the lefts gullibility when you mentioned MAGA gullibility was irrelevant?
You gaslighting me bro? 😂
Try again.
First of all, climate change has nothing to do with the country being built on slavery. So yes, it was irrelevant. Second, you pointing out some fringe 2012 bullshit tells me you aren't serious about talking about it anyway.
It's your ilk that are fringe lunatics so either you own their dogma or you don't. It's a bundled package, the lunatics come as a prize pack and you don't get to cherry pick. Sorry for your luck. 😂
Gullibility is relevant to gullibility.
It is really getting old explaining the obvious to stupid people.
I like that you think that you being an actual cultist is equivalent to me being in the same hemisphere politically as a couple of morons. It's cute.
Navi isn't a cult member. He may prefer Trump to the known alternatives but he has been critical of Trump on several occasions.
Just FYI...most cult members are not critical of their cult leaders.
I've declared "winning" something?
Sounds like deep down you're admitting you've lost these arguments
Some here present data and some like you rely on opinion...perfect example is the SCOTUS
You've been presented data proving the influence of financial corruption of conservative justices
And your response was some irrelevant nonsense about democrat leaks which were "investigated" by the conservative justice and not to be found
You live by factless opinions...others rely on actual data
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...ter-suppression-lobbying-election-action-plan
Rightwing group pours millions in ‘dark money’ into US voter suppression bid
Tax filings reveal advocacy arm of Heritage Foundation spent $5m on lobbying in 2021 to block voting rights in battleground states
Brendan Fischer and Ed Pilkington
Fri 13 Jan 2023 05.00 EST
The advocacy arm of the Heritage Foundation, the powerful conservative thinktank based in Washington, spent more than $5m on lobbying in 2021 as it worked to block federal voting rights legislation and advance an ambitious plan to spread its far-right agenda calling for aggressive voter suppression measures in battleground states.
Previously unreported 2021 tax filings from Heritage Action for America, which operates as the foundation’s activist wing, shows that it spent $5.1m on contracting outside lobbying services. The outlay comes on top of $560,000 the group invested in its own in-house federal lobbying efforts that year, as well as registered lobbying by Heritage Action staffers in at least 24 states.
The 990 tax filing was obtained by the watchdog group Documented and shared with the Guardian. It points to the pivotal role that Heritage Action is increasingly playing in shaping the rules that govern US democracy.
The efforts help explain the unprecedented tidal wave of restrictive voting laws that spread across Republican-controlled states in the wake of the 2020 presidential election. The Brennan Center reported that more voter suppression laws were passed in 2021 than in any year since it began monitoring voting legislation more than a decade ago.
Last edited:
Now I kind of remember when you were critical of Trump but can you point to when NavigatorII was?
If you're looking for a link, no I cannot. I've slacked on my indexing for when people on this board speak ill of Trump. 😂
If you're asking in what context he was critical of Trump, he has said things like he doesn't know when to shut up, he can be stubborn and immature and that he's not the greatest at picking his battles.
He also may have criticized him over not cleaning house when he got elected (personnel choices) and for not pushing through to finish the wall when he had Congress...but I wouldn't bet my life on these last two.
Thanks, I just don't remember him ever saying anything negative about him but I could be wrong.
A couple? Have you seen the last clown car of 2020 Dim candidates running for primaries and who are the next crop of lunatics for 24? 😂
No kidding. Trump's not perfect. He made mistakes, particularly in trusting people surrounding him. But to be fair, the pool of people existing the cesspool of the Swamp is like recruiting from the winners of the Special Olympics. That was a flaw but where do we find quality help? On the other hand, the Potato goes out of his way to find every bearded lady from the circus and other freaks to be in his administration. There IS a difference.😂😂😂
I've said several times Trump effed up by not building the wall one day one or sanctioning Mexico into forcing them to building a wall on their southern border. I think that was what Trump had in mind originally, we have less of a problem with Mexicans than we do with the sludge that matriculates through their country unfettered right to our border. We could have funded a huge wall on their southern border for a song compared to what it will cost us. Trump didn't have the sense of urgency of getting that done because he didn't realize the House and Senate can flip on you during midterms. They almost always do. This is my biggest complaint with Trump.......and looking back, Jeff Sessions was a useless cuck and a complete waste of an AG.
