Heather Dinich...
- Thread starter sadgator
- Start date
She is attractive enough
But what an astonishingly pointless position she does
Thanks Heather, so now we know, Utah losing last night hurt their chances
It would be better for Georgia to win today than to lose
Ohio State is undefeated
Clemson is undefeated
LSU is undefeated
The Baylor/Oklahoma winner has a better chance than the loser
She is deep
But what an astonishingly pointless position she does
Thanks Heather, so now we know, Utah losing last night hurt their chances
It would be better for Georgia to win today than to lose
Ohio State is undefeated
Clemson is undefeated
LSU is undefeated
The Baylor/Oklahoma winner has a better chance than the loser
She is deep
She provides absolutely nothing worth listening to. Her commentary is as nuanced as a bucket of flour.
Agreed. Heather Dinich makes zero sense as to how she is employed to do what she does.
She’s pretty pr for the course when it comes to women in sports.
the only real exception I know is Rachel Nichols.
She knows and understands basketball at a surprisingly high level.
the only real exception I know is Rachel Nichols.
She knows and understands basketball at a surprisingly high level.
She just reported that if Baylor scores more points today than Oklahoma does that would bode well for Baylor winning and better for them making the playoff
The only real insight would be for her to declaratively state whether the Baylor/OU winner would advance should Georgia win. Would they advance over LSU? A losing Clemson? Or a losing Ohio State?
We can all guess. She must give an affirmative comment otherwise what is the point
The only real insight would be for her to declaratively state whether the Baylor/OU winner would advance should Georgia win. Would they advance over LSU? A losing Clemson? Or a losing Ohio State?
We can all guess. She must give an affirmative comment otherwise what is the point
And ugly.
Then again I’ve always thought all reporters were annoying even the attractive ones. Especially sideline reporters. They gotta be the most useless part of any broadcast.
Reporter: “Hey coach you’re down 21-0 and struggling to stop their offense what changes will you make in the second half?”
Coach: “we gotta do a better job against the pass.”
Reporter: “Thanks coach. Back to you Kirk.”
YES! Those damn halftime interviews are only good when you see a coach lose his shit. But 99% of the time the questions are 3rd grade level. “Hey, coach how ya feeling?”
Now that is some first rate reporting, right there! I wonder if the team that scores the most points will win.
It is now 4th down for Baylor, she pointed out they can go for it, punt, or attempt a FG. She said that the committee likes it when a team does one of those things on 4th down
You guys are completely out of touch. Holly Rowe is the GOAT for most disgusting sideline reporter. 
You guys are completely out of touch. Holly Rowe is the GOAT for most disgusting sideline reporter.
I mean yeah but everyone had know. That for years now.
It’s a given.
OMFG
This is for real
Heather Dinich predicts Oklahoma to be 4 seed
https://www.espn.com/college-football/
She really gets paid for these gems?
After LSU crushed Georgia, who knew?
Dinich also reports that the other three will likely be LSU, Clemson and Ohio State in some order. She said the committee prefers when teams win and that winning games beats losing them.
This is for real
Heather Dinich predicts Oklahoma to be 4 seed
https://www.espn.com/college-football/
She really gets paid for these gems?
After LSU crushed Georgia, who knew?
Dinich also reports that the other three will likely be LSU, Clemson and Ohio State in some order. She said the committee prefers when teams win and that winning games beats losing them.
Similar threads
