Guys, a warning about liberal fact-checkers and how they are intentionally lying

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

I'm sure a lot of the critical thinkers have caught this, but the liberal 'fact checkers' have started lying in their fact checks. They take something that was said or happened, and slightly alter what they claimed happen in order to announce that it was 'fact checked' as being true or false, when it was actually the opposite.

Here's a hypothetical example. Let's say obama was caught on a hot mic saying "I hate being an American".

Snopes would then post: "Fact Check - Did obama really say he's not proud to be an American? Then they would claim they 'investigated' the claim, and found it to be False.

See what they did? In this hypothetical example, obama didn't say he wasn't proud to be an American, he said "I hate being an American".

But whenever anyone points out what obama said, a liberal will link to Snopes. "Sorry, you're lying, Snopes fact-checked that!"

When Snopes are the ones lying.

So be careful, all the liberal 'fact checkers' are now doing this.

 

[Nolec]

I'm sure a lot of the critical thinkers have caught this, but the liberal 'fact checkers' have started lying in their fact checks. They take something that was said or happened, and slightly alter what they claimed happen in order to announce that it was 'fact checked' as being true or false, when it was actually the opposite.

Here's a hypothetical example. Let's say obama was caught on a hot mic saying "I hate being an American".

Snopes would then post: "Fact Check - Did obama really say he's not proud to be an American? Then they would claim they 'investigated' the claim, and found it to be False.

See what they did? In this hypothetical example, obama didn't say he wasn't proud to be an American, he said "I hate being an American".

But whenever anyone points out what obama said, a liberal will link to Snopes. "Sorry, you're lying, Snopes fact-checked that!"

When Snopes are the ones lying.

So be careful, all the liberal 'fact checkers' are now doing this.

OH no. Are all fact checkers evil libs, or just Snopes?

 

[Ncgatr1]

I do find it interesting that pretty much every fact checker or fact checking site has liberal ties. Fact checkers are just a small part of the liberal agenda machine aimed at building anti Trump sentiment. If Trump or a conservative source is fact checked it is usually done with the intention of creating a negative view. I think most conservatives understand this and this is why they are ignored.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

I do find it interesting that pretty much every fact checker or fact checking site has liberal ties. Fact checkers are just a small part of the liberal agenda machine aimed at building anti Trump sentiment. If Trump or a conservative source is fact checked it is usually done with the intention of creating a negative view. I think most conservatives understand this and this is why they are ignored.

Liberals know their own people. Liberals never fact-check anything. Just tell them the story they want to hear, and that's all they need.

Critical thinkers want accurate information. Look at Snopes: Their reviews are constantly proven to be inaccurate, they often intentionally misstate claims, and sometimes outright lie.

As a result, critical thinkers don't consider Snopes to be a source of accurate information.

How many liberals have you ever heard tell you that they don't find Snopes credible? I've never encountered one, and I bet you haven't either.

 

[GADAWGinIraq]

I'm sure a lot of the critical thinkers have caught this, but the liberal 'fact checkers' have started lying in their fact checks. They take something that was said or happened, and slightly alter what they claimed happen in order to announce that it was 'fact checked' as being true or false, when it was actually the opposite.

Here's a hypothetical example. Let's say obama was caught on a hot mic saying "I hate being an American".

Snopes would then post: "Fact Check - Did obama really say he's not proud to be an American? Then they would claim they 'investigated' the claim, and found it to be False.

See what they did? In this hypothetical example, obama didn't say he wasn't proud to be an American, he said "I hate being an American".

But whenever anyone points out what obama said, a liberal will link to Snopes. "Sorry, you're lying, Snopes fact-checked that!"

When Snopes are the ones lying.

So be careful, all the liberal 'fact checkers' are now doing this.

Exhibit A: they just cannot say true, this happened. They claim events have happened since (usually because of backlash).
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/oregon-whites-only-masks/

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Exhibit A: they just cannot say true, this happened. They claim events have happened since (usually because of backlash).
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/oregon-whites-only-masks/

PERFECT example of what I mean. Note the headline isn't even the same as the claim under it, which is supposed to be the headline.

No one said anywhere in Oregon said anything about a 'whites only' mask regulation. That's literally something Snopes just made up.

But there was a 'blacks are exempt' regulation, we even talked about it here.

But as usual, Snopes twists the claim into something it wasn't, so it can attempt to cast doubt of the REAL regulation.

To fool the sheep. And it works like a charm.