It seems that there is a trend particularly among the Big 10 and SEC for new NIL contracts to be tilted towards the schools, some requiring buyout clauses and other increasing or decreasing the payout based on the players performance. In general it seems that the contracts are trying to discourage player movement and also trying to avoid using the dreaded "employee of the university" phrasing. The lawyer that we love to hate, Heitner is quoted multiple times. For those that want more details, go here: https://www.espn.com/college-sports...caa-sec-college-contracts-name-image-likeness.
ESPN analysis of current NIL contracts
- Thread starter bigsnake49
- Start date
