ADVERTISEMENT

Do any of you want Trump to have Immunity?

Yes from Covid, but he got the jab several times so I doubt he got the immunity
 
Be more specific. What type of immunity.

Let the record show I don't want former presidents on trial or in prison for anything less than treason or fomenting insurrection. As defined by statute, not vague comments or "he waited three hours to do anything."
Well, he has asked for blanket immunity I believe.....which we can all probably agree doesn't make sense.

But your OK with a president committing all other manner of crimes?

BTW, the "I love you, your very special" part of it wasn't vague at all.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: LordofallSocks
Be more specific. What type of immunity.

Let the record show I don't want former presidents on trial or in prison for anything less than treason or fomenting insurrection. As defined by statute, not vague comments or "he waited three hours to do anything."
Very. Well. Said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
Well, he has asked for blanket immunity I believe.....which we can all probably agree doesn't make sense.

But your OK with a president committing all other manner of crimes?

BTW, the "I love you, your very special" part of it wasn't vague at all.
National Security. Presidents get gangsta and do dirty on the regular. I don't need to know what rough men do in darkness on my behalf, I just need them to get that shit done.
 
Well, he has asked for blanket immunity I believe.....which we can all probably agree doesn't make sense.

But your OK with a president committing all other manner of crimes?

BTW, the "I love you, your very special" part of it wasn't vague at all.
Trump has never asked for blanket immunity.

We have a thing called the Presidential Records Act. Which I will point out doesn’t apply to Senators and Vice Presidents.

And what crimes has he committed?

And *you’re

It’s a conjunction of “you are”. As in, “you are very special”. Very special isn’t a noun, so the possessive ‘your’ makes no sense.

Hope this helps.
 
that's a bad example. I'm speaking more of Obama and drone attacks that whack civilians along with high value targets.
So then, perhaps you would agree with me that there is a difference between a president doing something in the name of the country.....lets pick something else from closer to that time period.....say the Iran-Contra affair for which Reagan, IMO, should never be prosecuted and what Nixon did for his own personal political gain and should be?
 
So then, perhaps you would agree with me that there is a difference between a president doing something in the name of the country.....lets pick something else from closer to that time period.....say the Iran-Contra affair for which Reagan, IMO, should never be prosecuted and what Nixon did for his own personal political gain and should be?
Yes. Theres no way in bloody hell a light bird had that kind of power.
 
Well, he has asked for blanket immunity I believe.....which we can all probably agree doesn't make sense.

But your OK with a president committing all other manner of crimes?

BTW, the "I love you, your very special" part of it wasn't vague at all.
Blanket immunity from gawt dammmed Democrat lawfare to keep him off the ballot? Absolutely.

19280529.gif
 
So then, perhaps you would agree with me that there is a difference between a president doing something in the name of the country.....lets pick something else from closer to that time period.....say the Iran-Contra affair for which Reagan, IMO, should never be prosecuted and what Nixon did for his own personal political gain and should be?
You are as much a conservative this shitbird is.........😂

Warren-Pocahontas.png
 
  • Love
Reactions: RussellCasse
Trump has never asked for blanket immunity.

We have a thing called the Presidential Records Act. Which I will point out doesn’t apply to Senators and Vice Presidents.

And what crimes has he committed?

And *you’re

It’s a conjunction of “you are”. As in, “you are very special”. Very special isn’t a noun, so the possessive ‘your’ makes no sense.

Hope this helps.
His lawyers are arguing for blanket/absolute immunity.
 
His lawyers are arguing for blanket/absolute immunity.
No, he isn't. That's how Jack Smith is trying to portray his request.

He's making the case that a president can't be tried for official acts undertaken as President.

We've been over this. Remember Obama ordering a drone strike on a US citizen abroad, killing him without a fair trial?

Under Jack Smith's interpretation Obama could be tried for murder upon leaving office.
 
No, he isn't. That's how Jack Smith is trying to portray his request.

He's making the case that a president can't be tried for official acts undertaken as President.

We've been over this. Remember Obama ordering a drone strike on a US citizen abroad, killing him without a fair trial?

Under Jack Smith's interpretation Obama could be tried for murder upon leaving office.
you know coming to your boy's rescue of every single thing diminishes whatever crediblity you think you have.. Try not being a slurper for 3 days. Starting now.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: LordofallSocks
But your OK with a president committing all other manner of crimes?
Im going to tell you what I told my man K. Former presidents get secret service protection for life because of what they know. We have any number of terrorists, foreign spies and random unclassified foreign nationals in federal prison. So no, i give zero effs about anything that doesn't have national security implications. It's not that they're above the law, its about the security of our Nation.

It is what it is.
 
No, he isn't. That's how Jack Smith is trying to portray his request.

He's making the case that a president can't be tried for official acts undertaken as President.

We've been over this. Remember Obama ordering a drone strike on a US citizen abroad, killing him without a fair trial?

Under Jack Smith's interpretation Obama could be tried for murder upon leaving office.
I seriously don't get why we argue or debate about things because you guys refuse to read. Multiple court filings reference and mention Trump lawyers arguing this. the judges even mentions it. Judge Pan asked his lawyer if he is immune from killing a rival.

I am not going down a red herring with you about Obama. I just said that he is indeed arguing for absolute immunity and the court filings confirm it. That's all i did.

From the actual filings;



 
This time you're talking out your ass. Every president does this stuff. You should hear about the shit FDR got up to.
Stand on your views! I didn't look but I am sure that you are in the multiple Biden crime threads saying that Biden can do whatever he wants as president. I am sure that you are consistent and you are saying that to Nails, navii, Fatman etc :cool:.

And before you ask, I think anyone that commits a crime should be charged, including Biden. I have said that repeatedly.
 
Doesn't need immunity. This is all clearly Leftist Lawfare. ALL OF IT!

Leftists fear Trump because they know Trump won 2020 and will win 2024!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Capt Ron 1
Stand on your views! I didn't look but I am sure that you are in the multiple Biden crime threads saying that Biden can do whatever he wants as president. I am sure that you are consistent and you are saying that to Nails, navii, Fatman etc :cool:.

And before you ask, I think anyone that commits a crime should be charged, including Biden. I have said that repeatedly.
I am consistent. I said neither Trump nor Biden should get any fallout for this document thing.

Impeachment on the other hand, I have no problem with.

I believe I said specifically Biden needs to cut his idiot son loose before he brings him down.

And if you refer to the very first post if mine in this thread, I believe I made an exception for treason. Treason is defined as "levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere."

Russia and China are our enemies. Connect the dots.

Once again with feeling, short of treason or insurrection, Biden is a president and I don't want him anywhere near a witness stand or prison.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RussellCasse
I am consistent. I said neither Trump nor Biden should get any fallout for this document thing.

Impeachment on the other hand, I have no problem with.

I believe I said specifically Biden needs to cut his idiot son loose before he brings him down.

And if you refer to the very first post if mine in this thread, I believe I made an exception for treason. Treason is defined as "levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere."

Russia and China are our enemies. Connect the dots.

Once again with feeling, short of treason or insurrection, Biden is a president and I don't want him anywhere near a witness stand or prison.
Well I'm sure to see those post, you know for consistency.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT