ADVERTISEMENT

Dims open can of worms about millions of missing dim voters from 2020

Yeah, we’ve talked about this in several threads. It’s beyond humorous. We all know the statistical outlier was 2020, not 2024.
As one pundit said, you don’t want to know the answer to that question 😝😝😝😝
 
I will say - and I am NOT a "stop the steal" person (outside of what is happening at the border) person, is why in the world was the turnout that much lower? Information was the same. Far earlier voting. Mail-in, etc. Michigan had all KINDS of opportunity to vote early.

The only demographic that makes sense are Arab Americans who thought that a vote for Kamala was a vote for Genocide. I fundamentally disagree, but that is a policy based decision.


Other?
 
I will say - and I am NOT a "stop the steal" person (outside of what is happening at the border) person, is why in the world was the turnout that much lower? Information was the same. Far earlier voting. Mail-in, etc. Michigan had all KINDS of opportunity to vote early.

The only demographic that makes sense are Arab Americans who thought that a vote for Kamala was a vote for Genocide. I fundamentally disagree, but that is a policy based decision.


Other?
Looking at past Presidential elections, the turnout was normal. 2020 was strangely about 15,000,000 above the norm.

It must be Harris's fault. If she would have just stayed in the basement and not campaigned, had China attack the US with another pandemic (so as cheating would be easy), she would have won.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NavigatorII
There are $7 M votes not counted yet in California alone.

When the votes all get counted it will be pretty close to the same number as last time.

But always a good time to start another ridiculous theory....................that can be squashed with 10 minutes and google.
 
Yeah, we’ve talked about this in several threads. It’s beyond humorous. We all know the statistical outlier was 2020, not 2024.
As one pundit said, you don’t want to know the answer to that question 😝😝😝😝
It is beyond humorous, but for a different reason.
 
I will say - and I am NOT a "stop the steal" person (outside of what is happening at the border) person, is why in the world was the turnout that much lower? Information was the same. Far earlier voting. Mail-in, etc. Michigan had all KINDS of opportunity to vote early.

The only demographic that makes sense are Arab Americans who thought that a vote for Kamala was a vote for Genocide. I fundamentally disagree, but that is a policy based decision.


Other?
It wasn't lower. They have votes to count yet. Look at Fox news election map.....they reflect $7 to $8M votes still outstanding in California alone. They mailed ballots to everybody and will be counting until December apparently. Arizona has more than $1M.
 
It wasn't lower. They have votes to count yet. Look at Fox news election map.....they reflect $7 to $8M votes still outstanding in California alone. They mailed ballots to everybody and will be counting until December apparently. Arizona has more than $1M.
Do you think it is acceptable to question a state that mails ballots to everyone and has in person voting thus making it possible to vote twice because they have a law against asking for voter id and still has 7 million votes to count? I think they might stop counting all those ballots when Kamala overtakes the popular vote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GatorTheo
And the 4 California house seats that republicans are currently leading in with only 54%-71% reporting. We will see how those end up. Pretty pathetic that the democrats rejected national voter id.
 
There are $7 M votes not counted yet in California alone.

When the votes all get counted it will be pretty close to the same number as last time.

But always a good time to start another ridiculous theory....................that can be squashed with 10 minutes and google.
Were you expectiing a few truck loads of ballots delivered by USPS after election day.........including ones delivered across state lines?..................... just like last time.:rolleyes:

Sorry for your luck, If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, flies like a duck...........then damn it, it's a duck. What are your useful idiots doing, if not manufacturing more Dim votes? What's the hold up?

99qbwx.jpg
 
Last edited:
Do you think it is acceptable to question a state that mails ballots to everyone and has in person voting thus making it possible to vote twice because they have a law against asking for voter id and still has 7 million votes to count? I think they might stop counting all those ballots when Kamala overtakes the popular vote.
I don't care if you question them. The right or wrong of how they are doing it wasn't the point of my post.

But the notion that they will stop counting when Kamala overtakes the popular vote (which she won't do anyway) is ridiculous on multiple levels.
 
I don't care if you question them. The right or wrong of how they are doing it wasn't the point of my post.

But the notion that they will stop counting when Kamala overtakes the popular vote (which she won't do anyway) is ridiculous on multiple levels.
It was hyperbole, but California has created the perfect template to cheat if they chose to.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: BCSpell
It was hyperbole, but California has created the perfect template to cheat if they chose to.
We should have a discussion about voting in this country and now that Trump is no longer on the ticket maybe than can take place. But its republicans that are generally the champions of state rights. And if that's your position you have to be willing to accept that some states won't do things that way you want them done. Personally I think it would be good to have one voting standard in the whole country......but that doesn't square with states rights, so I suspect we are stuck with a bunch of different standards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCSpell
Do you think it is acceptable to question a state that mails ballots to everyone and has in person voting thus making it possible to vote twice because they have a law against asking for voter id and still has 7 million votes to count? I think they might stop counting all those ballots when Kamala overtakes the popular vote.
The popular vote wouldn't make any difference but they could make sure only democrats win their congressional seats.
 
We should have a discussion about voting in this country and now that Trump is no longer on the ticket maybe than can take place. But its republicans that are generally the champions of state rights. And if that's your position you have to be willing to accept that some states won't do things that way you want them done. Personally I think it would be good to have one voting standard in the whole country......but that doesn't square with states rights, so I suspect we are stuck with a bunch of different standards.
The only real thing I would want is that all states figure out a way to have ALL the votes counted by Wednesday if they can't finish it on Tuesday. It's happening here in MD too. One House race, the Repub out did the Dem on early voting and election day voting and was up almost 6,000 votes, then the past 3 days all of the mail in ballots have basically fallen for the Dem and now she is up something like 4,000. I call that crazy.
 
The only real thing I would want is that all states figure out a way to have ALL the votes counted by Wednesday if they can't finish it on Tuesday. It's happening here in MD too. One House race, the Repub out did the Dem on early voting and election day voting and was up almost 6,000 votes, then the past 3 days all of the mail in ballots have basically fallen for the Dem and now she is up something like 4,000. I call that crazy.
Hopefully there are observers making sure the count is on the up and up.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT