ADVERTISEMENT

Democrat Privilege, No Wonder They Hate Musk

I realize that someone wrote this on twitter but is there some official doge record of it?

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=chelsea+clinton+usaid&ia=web
There’s never 100% truth in anything you find on the Internet, but there’s enough truth in it to realize there’s privilege involved. How do you get a 900,000 are your job coming out of college? And that is true.
And are you really saying, the Clintons haven’t benefited from alive money being thrown their way?
lol
 
I realize that someone wrote this on twitter but is there some official doge record of it?

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=chelsea+clinton+usaid&ia=web
Did DOGE find a line item that was marked 'This is money USAID paid the Clintons for Haitian relief and instead it will be spent on Chelsea's wedding'?

No.

Did they find an $84 million payment directly to the Clintons? Yes.

Did the Clintons soon after spend most of that same amount on a lavish wedding for Hillary Jr? Yes.

In fact, it was even discussed on this board multiple times. Those of us who do our own research and think for ourselves knew that. The ones that subscribe to cutesy 'It's Twitter, so ignore it' talking points missed it.

Lather, rinse, repeat.
 
Did DOGE find a line item that was marked 'This is money USAID paid the Clintons for Haitian relief and instead it will be spent on Chelsea's wedding'?

No.

Did they find an $84 million payment directly to the Clintons? Yes.

Did the Clintons soon after spend most of that same amount on a lavish wedding for Hillary Jr? Yes.

In fact, it was even discussed on this board multiple times. Those of us who do our own research and think for ourselves knew that. The ones that subscribe to cutesy 'It's Twitter, so ignore it' talking points missed it.

Lather, rinse, repeat.
The twitter story that OP presented said there were line items showing that the money was spent on the wedding. That's like the entire point of the story yet it's apparently not correct.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LordofallSocks
There’s never 100% truth in anything you find on the Internet, but there’s enough truth in it to realize there’s privilege involved. How do you get a 900,000 are your job coming out of college? And that is true.
And are you really saying, the Clintons haven’t benefited from alive money being thrown their way?
lol
Well connected people get special treatment all the time but that doesn't justify making stuff up and trying to pass it off as real.

That'd be like me making up a story about how stupid Kamala is and, when you catch me in a lie, I say "well, she is stupid anyway".
 
  • Like
Reactions: LordofallSocks
Did DOGE find a line item that was marked 'This is money USAID paid the Clintons for Haitian relief and instead it will be spent on Chelsea's wedding'?

No.

Did they find an $84 million payment directly to the Clintons? Yes.

Did the Clintons soon after spend most of that same amount on a lavish wedding for Hillary Jr? Yes.

In fact, it was even discussed on this board multiple times. Those of us who do our own research and think for ourselves knew that. The ones that subscribe to cutesy 'It's Twitter, so ignore it' talking points missed it.

Lather, rinse, repeat.
Exactly. They’re clearly you got a couple of people here that wanna live in their own reality even though it’s not real.
@LordofallSocks @GatorTheo

And believe us, there are plenty of Republicans that were guilty of this as well, which is why they resisted Trump at first until he crushed them.
 
I realize that someone wrote this on twitter but is there some official doge record of it?

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=chelsea+clinton+usaid&ia=web
I like how you use another source from the Internet to discredit a source from the Internet after saying it’s not reliable because it’s on the Internet, or Twitter, these are both on Twitter too

Pick what suits your reality I guess. But if you’re dumb enough to think that the Clinton’s or the Obama’s haven’t made hundreds of million dollars off of our taxes then you’re an ignorant fool
 
I like how you use another source from the Internet to discredit a source from the Internet after saying it’s not reliable because it’s on the Internet, or Twitter, these are both on Twitter too

Pick what suits your reality I guess. But if you’re dumb enough to think that the Clinton’s or the Obama’s haven’t made hundreds of million dollars off of our taxes then you’re an ignorant fool
Theo is being a bad troll, which seems to be his lot in life. He's focusing on minutiae of the claim to try to discount the entire claim.

Let's say someone tweets: "Breaking: Kamala has a serious drug problem and has checked herself into a clinic and has been there for 36 days and has had 8 'violent outbursts' while there."

Let's say we find out that in actuality, Kamala has been there for 37 days, and has had 5 violent outbursts.

A normal person would see both tweets and say "Wow, Kamala clearly has a serious drug problem".

A bad troll would see both tweets and say "Well the second tweet proves the first was wrong, so the whole story is a lie. Never trust Twitter".
 
  • Like
Reactions: gator1776
Theo is being a bad troll, which seems to be his lot in life. He's focusing on minutiae of the claim to try to discount the entire claim.

Let's say someone tweets: "Breaking: Kamala has a serious drug problem and has checked herself into a clinic and has been there for 36 days and has had 8 'violent outbursts' while there."

Let's say we find out that in actuality, Kamala has been there for 37 days, and has had 5 violent outbursts.

A normal person would see both tweets and say "Wow, Kamala clearly has a serious drug problem".

A bad troll would see both tweets and say "Well the second tweet proves the first was wrong, so the whole story is a lie. Never trust Twitter".
Exactly. Because the details aren’t 100% perfectly, correct, but rather 95% correct, somehow it’s wrong.
Lol
 
Exactly. They’re clearly you got a couple of people here that wanna live in their own reality even though it’s not real.
@LordofallSocks @GatorTheo

And believe us, there are plenty of Republicans that were guilty of this as well, which is why they resisted Trump at first until he crushed them.
Sorry, man. You need more trumpers to blindly believe your twitter story.

@fatman76 @Capt Ron 1 @nail1988

I know there are others.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: nail1988
Sorry, man. You need more trumpers to blindly believe your twitter story.

@fatman76 @Capt Ron 1 @nail1988

I know there are others.
I find it hilariously telling that this thread is your introduction to the fact that The Clintons misused the money and resources they got from the Haitian earthquake.

It happened 15 years ago, bro.

Spoiler alert: This isn't even the tip of the iceberg on what happened. Very deep and dark rabbit hole to go down.
 
Exactly. Because the details aren’t 100% perfectly, correct, but rather 95% correct, somehow it’s wrong.
Lol
"CONFIRMED - DOGE SAYS USAID GAVE CHELSEA CLINTON $84 MILLION - WHICH WAS 'SUPPOSED' TO GO FOR RELIEF IN HAITI - LINE ITEMS SHOW 3 MILLION, OF THE $84 MILLION, WAS SPENT ON CHELSEA CLINTONS WEDDING AND WAIT FOR IT...$10 MILLION TO PURCHASE A LUXERY MANSION ALL ON OUR DIME!"

That must be the 5% that isn't correct.
 
Article from 2016, Julian knows..............

XRXNEY5GXNPXNERNVYSEMBTZE4.jpg


Chelsea Clinton used her family foundation’s cash to pay for her wedding, living expenses and taxes on gifts of cash from her parents, according to a bombshell email made public Sunday.

Doug Band, formerly a top aide to President Bill Clinton, griped about the former first daughter’s spending in a Jan. 4, 2012, email released by WikiLeaks.

“The investigation into her getting paid for campaigning, using foundation resources for her wedding and life for a decade, taxes on money from her parents…,” Band wrote to John Podesta, now Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman.

“I hope that you will speak to her and end this. Once we go down this road…”

Band’s message is contained in a chain of emails that were hacked from Podesta’s Gmail account. WikiLeaks has released more than 50,000 of the stolen emails over the past 32 days.



 
Exactly. They’re clearly you got a couple of people here that wanna live in their own reality even though it’s not real.
@LordofallSocks @GatorTheo

And believe us, there are plenty of Republicans that were guilty of this as well, which is why they resisted Trump at first until he crushed them.
My point has always been theres enough dirt to discredit the left without manufacturing it.

Your mileage may vary.

Also Ghost is a Trump/Musk dick rider that welches on board bets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
Article from 2016, Julian knows..............

XRXNEY5GXNPXNERNVYSEMBTZE4.jpg


Chelsea Clinton used her family foundation’s cash to pay for her wedding, living expenses and taxes on gifts of cash from her parents, according to a bombshell email made public Sunday.

Doug Band, formerly a top aide to President Bill Clinton, griped about the former first daughter’s spending in a Jan. 4, 2012, email released by WikiLeaks.

“The investigation into her getting paid for campaigning, using foundation resources for her wedding and life for a decade, taxes on money from her parents…,” Band wrote to John Podesta, now Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman.

“I hope that you will speak to her and end this. Once we go down this road…”

Band’s message is contained in a chain of emails that were hacked from Podesta’s Gmail account. WikiLeaks has released more than 50,000 of the stolen emails over the past 32 days.



"So OP was 95% correct" - Theo
 
I find it hilariously telling that this thread is your introduction to the fact that The Clintons misused the money and resources they got from the Haitian earthquake.

It happened 15 years ago, bro.

Spoiler alert: This isn't even the tip of the iceberg on what happened. Very deep and dark rabbit hole to go down.
Yeah, it’s amazing how you go from being president making around $350,000 a year to owning mansions and upstate New York and on Martha’s Vineyard having a daughter with a bachelors degree making $1 million a year right out of college and so on and so forth. Just like everybody in politics, these guys were peddling their influence to the top dollar. And then developing these multiple fronts to funnel money directly to them. And don’t get us wrong. Because they were plenty of Republicans doing the exact same damn thing. That’s what’s great about having outsiders in Washington to stir shit up.
 
Yeah, it’s amazing how you go from being president making around $350,000 a year to owning mansions and upstate New York and on Martha’s Vineyard having a daughter with a bachelors degree making $1 million a year right out of college and so on and so forth. Just like everybody in politics, these guys were peddling their influence to the top dollar. And then developing these multiple fronts to funnel money directly to them. And don’t get us wrong. Because they were plenty of Republicans doing the exact same damn thing. That’s what’s great about having outsiders in Washington to stir shit up.
Let me remind you both they Clintons in a book after they left office admitted that they were dead broke
 
Yeah, it’s amazing how you go from being president making around $350,000 a year to owning mansions and upstate New York and on Martha’s Vineyard having a daughter with a bachelors degree making $1 million a year right out of college and so on and so forth. Just like everybody in politics, these guys were peddling their influence to the top dollar. And then developing these multiple fronts to funnel money directly to them. And don’t get us wrong. Because they were plenty of Republicans doing the exact same damn thing. That’s what’s great about having outsiders in Washington to stir shit up.
You can raise a bazillion dollars and take most of it as long as you pay taxes on it. Want to find out what is going on? Check their form 990. Its usually online. It will list salaries and other financials.
 
Yeah, it’s amazing how you go from being president making around $350,000 a year to owning mansions and upstate New York and on Martha’s Vineyard having a daughter with a bachelors degree making $1 million a year right out of college and so on and so forth. Just like everybody in politics, these guys were peddling their influence to the top dollar. And then developing these multiple fronts to funnel money directly to them. And don’t get us wrong. Because they were plenty of Republicans doing the exact same damn thing. That’s what’s great about having outsiders in Washington to stir shit up.
Yes, there are many republicans that are corrupt and taking kickbacks and the like.

The Clintons are in a different league.


"Where did the children go?"
 
I find it hilariously telling that this thread is your introduction to the fact that The Clintons misused the money and resources they got from the Haitian earthquake.

It happened 15 years ago, bro.

Spoiler alert: This isn't even the tip of the iceberg on what happened. Very deep and dark rabbit hole to go down.
Unamerican democrats gonna be unamerican democrats
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT