ADVERTISEMENT

Conservative Beauty Pagent winner stripped of her title because she is a Conservative

Hmmmm. Zhu? Maybe she should go fix the human rights issues in her own country before lecturing Americans who are less foreign looking.

I stand with the Donald on this one.
 
Beauty pageants are increasingly becoming 'politicised,' or becoming a front for pushing libtard sjw blm lbgt politics. They usually have segments that consist simply in the candidates talking about 'world issues,' that is typically just a judgement of who can speak the most commie talking-points in a short time (and leaves one questioning why the audience is expecting meaningful political or social commentary from beauty pageant contestants). It's not a surprise that they would eventually turn this into a witch-hunt against people who make sense.
 
Beauty pageants are increasingly becoming 'politicised,' or becoming a front for pushing libtard sjw blm lbgt politics. They usually have segments that consist simply in the candidates talking about 'world issues,' that is typically just a judgement of who can speak the most commie talking-points in a short time (and leaves one questioning why the audience is expecting meaningful political or social commentary from beauty pageant contestants). It's not a surprise that they would eventually turn this into a witch-hunt against people who make sense.

Lol! Yes the beauty pageant industry seems very politically aware.
 
Hmmmm. Zhu? Maybe she should go fix the human rights issues in her own country before lecturing Americans who are less foreign looking.

I stand with the Donald on this one.

I will help you out here. First Zhu is pro-American. Her race or family origin is irrelevant because she has assimilated into the American brand of western civilization. The group of 4 are promoting non- western civ thought. They are promoting un-American (as in the traditional sense of individualism, capitalism, property rights and traditional moral values) ideas.

They are the ones who need to leave and go to their ancestral homes and see that the American way of life is superior and return humbled and prepared to finally assimilate into a pro free market, judeo-christian ethos centered republican form of government. Individualism and socialism /collectivism are incompatible.

They need to understand that the individual citizen is the sovereign and that they are servants and their job is to preserve and protect the God given rights of their voters. This would mean the promotion of individual liberty while understanding that this does not include licentiousness as was the intent of the Founders/Framers.

In translation to further aid you in understanding the concept of original intent as to liberty and rights, what the Judeo-Christian God has deemed immoral could not be rightly classified as a right as the Founders would have seen it.

As an example of how things have gone wrong let us look at same sex marriage. It would not have been nor should it have been up to 5 men/women in robes to decide that matter. It clearly violates the ethos of the people as 30 states had banned it. The Founders had stricter laws against it than we do today. This does not comport with their ideas of a right and marriage is a well regulated privilege much like driving. This is rightly a state issue.

This republic protects the rights of the political minority by requiring a super majority via amendment to change things on a national level. The robed ones have constantly skirted that to impose the mores of the the left upon the rest of the country.

We will know that SCOTUS has been fixed when it begins to rule against big national government edicts that undermine individualism aka Obamacares individual mandate and return the decisions on social issues like same sex marriage, transgender policies and abortion to the states where those decisions belong. If a national solution to Healthcare and social issues is desire then the amendment process is required and the 2/3rd hurdle must be surpassed before binding the whole nation to the immoral whims of the left or their collectivist machinations concerning healthcare.

Such a path of restraint will actually lead to more civility as people vote with their feet by moving to states that reflect their mores and the left is disarmed from being able to use the courts to coerce the public.

That restraint was undermined by FDR and it has gotten worse since.

Trump never gets elected in a society that allows Cali to live its way and TN and Fla to live its way. He never gets elected if the SCOTUS was 100% originalist.

Trump never gets elected if Obamacare was ruled unconstitutional as it should have been. An individual mandate is incompatible with the founders vision of rights especially liberty and property. As it would violate original intent is should have been sent to the trash bin.

Trump never gets elected if LBJs Worst Society is struck down by the courts. It does not fall within the enumerated powers of national government

Without LBS WS illegal immigration does not become an issue as less would be here and those that would be here would have less influence on politics.

You see the "squad" would move us further away from these concepts and Trump is the blowback from 50+ years of leftist libertarian paternalism that hopefully reached its zenith under Obama and is in permanent decline.

Zhu supports a return to the ideas and values that make America exceptional and will return her to the founders vision and their brand of western civilization.

She has assimilated and they have not.
 
Last edited:
Hmmmm. Zhu? Maybe she should go fix the human rights issues in her own country before lecturing Americans who are less foreign looking.

I stand with the Donald on this one.
Change from the blue colored pill your currently taking
and go to the red colored pill and come back and see me
in a couple of weeks. You will discover that it has done
wonders for you
 
I will help you out here. First Zhu is pro-American. Her race or family origin is irrelevant because she has assimilated into the American brand of western civilization. The group of 4 are promoting non- western civ thought. They are promoting un-American (as in the traditional sense of individualism, capitalism, property rights and traditional moral values) ideas.

They are the ones who need to leave and go to their ancestral homes and see that the American way of life is superior and return humbled and prepared to finally assimilate into a pro free market, judeo-christian ethos centered republican form of government. Individualism and socialism /collectivism are incompatible.

They need to understand that the individual citizen is the sovereign and that they are servants and their job is to preserve and protect the God given rights of their voters. This would mean the promotion of individual liberty while understanding that this does not include licentiousness as was the intent of the Founders/Framers.

In translation to further aid you in understanding the concept of original intent as to liberty and rights, what the Judeo-Christian God has deemed immoral could not be rightly classified as a right as the Founders would have seen it.

As an example of how things have gone wrong let us look at same sex marriage. It would not have been nor should it have been up to 5 men/women in robes to decide that matter. It clearly violates the ethos of the people as 30 states had banned it. The Founders had stricter laws against it than we do today. This does not comport with their ideas of a right and marriage is a well regulated privilege much like driving. This is rightly a state issue.

This republic protects the rights of the political minority by requiring a super majority via amendment to change things on a national level. The robed ones have constantly skirted that to impose the mores of the the left upon the rest of the country.

We will know that SCOTUS has been fixed when it begins to rule against big national government edicts that undermine individualism aka Obamacares individual mandate and return the decisions on social issues like same sex marriage, transgender policies and abortion to the states where those decisions belong. If a national solution to Healthcare and social issues is desire then the amendment process is required and the 2/3rd hurdle must be surpassed before binding the whole nation to the immoral whims of the left or their collectivist machinations concerning healthcare.

Such a path of restraint will actually lead to more civility as people vote with their feet by moving to states that reflect their mores and the left is disarmed from being able to use the courts to coerce the public.

That restraint was undermined by FDR and it has gotten worse since.

Trump never gets elected in a society that allows Cali to live its way and TN and Fla to live its way. He never gets elected if the SCOTUS was 100% originalist.

Trump never gets elected if Obamacare was ruled unconstitutional as it should have been. An individual mandate is incompatible with the founders vision of rights especially liberty and property. As it would violate original intent is should have been sent to the trash bin.

Trump never gets elected if LBJs Worst Society is struck down by the courts. It does not fall within the enumerated powers of national government

Without LBS WS illegal immigration does not become an issue as less would be here and those that would be here would have less influence on politics.

You see the "squad" would move us further away from these concepts and Trump is the blowback from 50+ years of leftist libertarian paternalism that hopefully reached its zenith under Obama and is in permanent decline.

Zhu supports a return to the ideas and values that make America exceptional and will return her to the founders vision and their brand of western civilization.

She has assimilated and they have not.

Well in fairness the non assimilated that you refer to all got college educations and did get themselves elected to Congress.

And you sound like a pretty thoughtful person, but are you making some pretty sweeping presumptions about Zhu? Are you aware of anything about her other than those two tweets?

The hijab one I can understand. I don’t know much about the hijab or what it represents, but I think Muslim treatment of women is a legitimate issue.

The BLM tweet seems ignorant and makes no sense anyway.

First of all, blacks kill more blacks, primarily because of proximity. Blacks are surrounded by blacks, so if one gets killed, it’s likely that a black person did it. Whites kill more whites and Hispanics kill more Hispanics.

Second, even if black on black crime is an issue, does that mean black people shouldn’t complain about police violence directed at them?

Anyway, this is the best thing that ever happened to her, because she will be a Fox contributor by the end of the week.
 
I don’t take pills. Guinness and weed only.
Didn't mean anything by what i said BradleyGator.
It's just an old saying that we tell each other at work.
When we mess up all you will hear somebody say is
either "You need to get your head out of your azz" or
"You need to change the color of pills that your taking".
 
Well in fairness the non assimilated that you refer to all got college educations and did get themselves elected to Congress.

And you sound like a pretty thoughtful person, but are you making some pretty sweeping presumptions about Zhu? Are you aware of anything about her other than those two tweets?

The hijab one I can understand. I don’t know much about the hijab or what it represents, but I think Muslim treatment of women is a legitimate issue.

The BLM tweet seems ignorant and makes no sense anyway.

First of all, blacks kill more blacks, primarily because of proximity. Blacks are surrounded by blacks, so if one gets killed, it’s likely that a black person did it. Whites kill more whites and Hispanics kill more Hispanics.

Second, even if black on black crime is an issue, does that mean black people shouldn’t complain about police violence directed at them?

Anyway, this is the best thing that ever happened to her, because she will be a Fox contributor by the end of the week.


Black Males make up only 6.2% of the total US population. Yet they commit 44% of ALL murders. (FBI Statistics)

Why?

Could LBJ's worst society which created the destruction of MLK's "Dream" by removing Black Fathers from the traditional nuclear family and replacing him with a welfare check be at fault? Along with democrats removing the shame from bastard birth?

MSLSD used to run a program on Saturdays where they would go inside prisons. One of the things they found was that 80% of ALL violent prisoners were Bastard Born and Welfare Raised.

Across all racial lines.


Black Liars Matter would be doing Black people a favor by ceasing the lie that Cops are out there looking for black men to kill( they kill more whites than blacks and the amount of Blacks killed by Cops nation wide yearly is less than the number of Blacks killed in a month in Chicago) and start demanding Congress put an end to lifetime welfare and instead, force those who want a check to work for it on Public Works Projects like FDR demanded and limit it to two years lifetime.
 
Black Males make up only 6.2% of the total US population. Yet they commit 44% of ALL murders. (FBI Statistics)

Why?

Could LBJ's worst society which created the destruction of MLK's "Dream" by removing Black Fathers from the traditional nuclear family and replacing him with a welfare check be at fault? Along with democrats removing the shame from bastard birth?

MSLSD used to run a program on Saturdays where they would go inside prisons. One of the things they found was that 80% of ALL violent prisoners were Bastard Born and Welfare Raised.

Across all racial lines.


Black Liars Matter would be doing Black people a favor by ceasing the lie that Cops are out there looking for black men to kill( they kill more whites than blacks and the amount of Blacks killed by Cops nation wide yearly is less than the number of Blacks killed in a month in Chicago) and start demanding Congress put an end to lifetime welfare and instead, force those who want a check to work for it on Public Works Projects like FDR demanded and limit it to two years lifetime.

Blacks make up 13 percent of the population but 25 percent of police killings. Blacks are killed by police at three times the rate of white people. 30 percent of blacks killed by police were unarmed (21 percent of white victims). Only one in three black victims was suspected of a violent crime and armed. In thirteen of the 100 largest cities, police killed blacks at rates higher than the murder rate.

So you throw your statistics in there and my statistics in there, and objectively, I’d say it’s a complicated issue. And telling blacks who would like police to stop killing them so much that they should “solve the problem” before they complain about it or organize politically is objectively ignorant.

I’m sure you will all enjoy her on Fox and Friends.
 
At a very early age my father taught me, if I'm walking in the street and a cop tells me to move to the sidewalk I do it. Today, seventy percent of young blacks have no father to instruct them. We have LBJ's "War on Poverty" and "Great Society" to thank.

MDVOL gets it. There is nothing hard here. This is not quantum physics.
 
Blacks make up 13 percent of the population but 25 percent of police killings. Blacks are killed by police at three times the rate of white people. 30 percent of blacks killed by police were unarmed (21 percent of white victims). Only one in three black victims was suspected of a violent crime and armed. In thirteen of the 100 largest cities, police killed blacks at rates higher than the murder rate.

So you throw your statistics in there and my statistics in there, and objectively, I’d say it’s a complicated issue. And telling blacks who would like police to stop killing them so much that they should “solve the problem” before they complain about it or organize politically is objectively ignorant.

I’m sure you will all enjoy her on Fox and Friends.


So far this year
As of the end of June, of the 102 Black individuals killed by police, eleven were completely unarmed (11% of the Blacks killed by police).

Fifteen of the 211 Whites killed by police were unarmed (7.1%). Of the 68 Hispanics killed by police so far in 2018, two were completely unarmed (3%)

Mistakes do get made and there have been innocent blacks and whites have been killed by Police Officers.

BUT, the vast majority of the small amount of Blacks, Whites and Latinos killed by police were killed during the commission of crimes and while trying to kill Cops trying to arrest them.

Since 1984, Blacks, (93% of them males between 14-35) have killed approx. 340,000 other blacks.

Cops ( this ain't 1965 with Bull Connors' 100% white Police force. Those shootings involve cops of every ethnicity) are not the problem.
But you and all other leftists would rather screech the lie than face the truth. The incivility among Black males due to being bastard born and welfare raised is the problem.
 
At a very early age my father taught me, if I'm walking in the street and a cop tells me to move to the sidewalk I do it. Today, seventy percent of young blacks have no father to instruct them. We have LBJ's "War on Poverty" and "Great Society" to thank.

MDVOL gets it. There is nothing hard here. This is not quantum physics.

Always interesting to hear dems discuss this issue. The police being at fault is almost always the first and only conclusion they draw.
 
Blacks make up 13 percent of the population but 25 percent of police killings. Blacks are killed by police at three times the rate of white people. 30 percent of blacks killed by police were unarmed (21 percent of white victims). Only one in three black victims was suspected of a violent crime and armed. In thirteen of the 100 largest cities, police killed blacks at rates higher than the murder rate.

So you throw your statistics in there and my statistics in there, and objectively, I’d say it’s a complicated issue. And telling blacks who would like police to stop killing them so much that they should “solve the problem” before they complain about it or organize politically is objectively ignorant.

I’m sure you will all enjoy her on Fox and Friends.
13.5 % of the population responsible for 75% of the crime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AgentOrange2217
From what I've read/understood...most beauty pageant contestants should consider running for politics since most of them spew nonsense and platitudes lacking any substance (kinda like Beto O'Rourke)...most of them would fit in well standing at the dais on democratic party debates.

One could say, "I'm gonna bring healing and world peace."
The next would say, "I'm all for fresh water."
The third would say, "I'm gonna protect the habitat(s) of the South American swamp rat."

All to thunderous applause.

But...I believe the pageants need to make a change...one where inked-up (tattooed), morbidly obese women can compete and tell how they've been marginalized and kept at the fringes of society for too long a time...bring some real inclusion to the gathering.

All to more thundering applause.

I'm thinking about investing in popcorn futures.

Agent Orange
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT