ADVERTISEMENT

bradleygator can you tell us more about how Trump caved to China on trade?

GhostOfMatchesMalone

Ring of Honor
Oct 1, 2012
36,955
47,829
113


Oh and just to twist the knife since good economic news infuriates you dems for some reason....



The greatest President in the history of our country. By the time he leaves office, every poster here will agree 100%.

Keep watching...the best is yet to come! #KAG #NotTiredOfWinning
 
  • Like
Reactions: GADAWGinIraq
Every poster here will not agree 100%. The US average IQ is a paltry 98.

Being a liberal requires you to dispel common sense and acting in your own best interests. I remain hopeful that the sheep will eventually awaken, but it's frustrating watching people willingly enslave themselves.
 
When I posted that Trump caved, I was referring to the fact that he did not impose scheduled tariffs on Dec 15 notwithstanding the fact that no deal with China was signed. Phase 1 was signed a month later with the primary benefit to the US being a promise from China to buy $200 billion of US imports over the next two years.

As far as the tariffs reduced by China (they were halved, not eliminated but you have to read beyond the headline to get that) they were imposed in response to Trump’s tariffs to begin with, so we haven’t even returned to the status quo pre-trade war.

As for the $200 billion commitment, I agree it sounds pretty good. Total US exports to China were $177B in 2017. But see this Brookings institution analysis explaining that the purchase commitments are politically unenforceable and in fact ultimately increase Chinese trade leverage. But they make for a good headline, which is all that is important to Trump, because he knows that his supporters are short attention span morons, such as yourself, who won’t bother with the details.
 
When I posted that Trump caved, I was referring to the fact that he did not impose scheduled tariffs on Dec 15 notwithstanding the fact that no deal with China was signed. Phase 1 was signed a month later with the primary benefit to the US being a promise from China to buy $200 billion of US imports over the next two years.

As far as the tariffs reduced by China (they were halved, not eliminated but you have to read beyond the headline to get that) they were imposed in response to Trump’s tariffs to begin with, so we haven’t even returned to the status quo pre-trade war.

As for the $200 billion commitment, I agree it sounds pretty good. Total US exports to China were $177B in 2017. But see this Brookings institution analysis explaining that the purchase commitments are politically unenforceable and in fact ultimately increase Chinese trade leverage. But they make for a good headline, which is all that is important to Trump, because he knows that his supporters are short attention span morons, such as yourself, who won’t bother with the details.

TL;DR: Trump caved, liberal source confirms, Trump supporters still morons, and also racists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sunburnt Indian
TL;DR: Trump caved, liberal source confirms, Trump supporters still morons, and also racists.

Do you consider the Brookings Institute to be a liberal source? I imagine your definition of liberal extends to anyone who writes more than a paragraph to analyze an issue.
 
Isn’t this analysis of the Brookings Institution’s political leanings?

Did you catch that they rated them very highly for reporting facts? Or you didn’t read that far?

I caught that you didn't know it was a liberal think tank. Moron Trump supporter outsmarts Hillary voter once again. :cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/brookings-institute/

'Analysis' being the key word. Critical thinkers just need the facts, sheep need 'analysis' so they can be told how to think about the facts.

Ghost, you might want to go ahead and enlighten your pals. Analysis is the simplest component of critical thinking.

In the future, I'll have to charge your opponents without being able to define the second simplest component of critical thinking. I'm preparing. I'm not ready for you to define math's simplest equation for them yet. I'll let you know. bradleygator might know. He's got a little bit on the ball.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT