ADVERTISEMENT

Bongino leaving FoxNews…

Yes but the liberals running Fox will only allow one host to tell the truth about the left. They need Tucker to anchor the network and hoodwink in viewers like @GatorTheo that think Fox is on 'their side', but anyone else Murdoch's liberal sons and Paul Ryan will ax. Bongino tells the truth, so he had to go. Just like Bill O'Reilly got punted and how they neutered Hannity. Also notice Tucker stopped reporting on what really happened on Jan 6th after just a couple of episodes despite it doing massive ratings. Clearly that was axed as well.

Eventually they will get Tucker. Probably move Jesse Watters to his slot and call it a day.
With Fox going liberal, where will you get your reliable news? DonaldTrump.com?
 
Trump won on Election Day. Trump lost the nights after when 2000 Mules stuffed enough ballots into drop boxes to get to an all time record 81 million of us stupid enough to get to what Biden promised in Democrat debates. No one would attend his rare campaign rally. Trump got a record Republican incumbent vote total. I stayed up till 3 AM Nov. 4. Las Vegas signed off on Trump and the Chinese yuan value nose dived because of a Trump win. Then 5 or 6 states said ,"oh wait! We've got all these mail-ins to count because of COVID."
Twas Russia….
 
With Fox going liberal, where will you get your reliable news? DonaldTrump.com?
Bongino is still on the radio (and podcast).

There are several media outlets that aren’t filtered, but some (Gateway Pundit) are so biased you have to research everything they report. Most of the time it checks out but occasionally they’re full of it.

Bongino Report has replaced Drudge as a solid news aggregator. Revolver is good at times.

The media is in such concert with themselves you have to work to get both sides.
 
It's the most watched news network. Fake news CNN still has you by the balls I see
CNN sucks also. I don't waste my time with any of that nonsense. Just a lot of partisan political blather.

But you do you. That's why you dolts still think the election was stolen. They prey on the gullible.

Only grumpy old men watch that shit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldmom
Word is Bartiromo and the Judge may be gone soon
I'm stunned Money Honey has survived as long as she has.

If that happens it's then down to Tucker and Jesse Watters. So they will invent a reason to can Tucker, and move Watters to his slot, as I suggested.
 
CNN sucks also. I don't waste my time with any of that nonsense. Just a lot of partisan political blather.

But you do you. That's why you dolts still think the election was stolen. They prey on the gullible.

Only grumpy old men watch that shit.
Fox News is nothing special….. essentially the tallest midget of a group of partisan news / infotainment cable channels. They are nominally slightly to the right but nowhere near as conservative as they once were.

The FNC website is still fairly solid IMO; much better than the cable channel.
 
CNN sucks also. I don't waste my time with any of that nonsense. Just a lot of partisan political blather.

But you do you. That's why you dolts still think the election was stolen. They prey on the gullible.

Only grumpy old men watch that shit.

You repeat CNN talking points all day long. You definitely watch it. I haven't watched the news in 6 or 7 yrs. , I watched it for about 2 months, very meh
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NavigatorII
You repeat CNN talking points all day long. You definitely watch it. I haven't watched the news in 6 or 7 yrs. , I watched it for about 2 months, very meh
Sorry dude, hate to disappoint. Haven't watched in over a year, and rarely then.

They are all crap.
 
Fox News is nothing special….. essentially the tallest midget of a group of partisan news / infotainment cable channels. They are nominally slightly to the right but nowhere near as conservative as they once were.

The FNC website is still fairly solid IMO; much better than the cable channel.
Agree. I don't mind the News feed but anything on cable is just propaganda.

All night time hosts are just Infotainment but some people take them seriously.

I have to disagree with "slightly to the right" though. My wife watches and it's nothing but Biden/Dem bashing 24/7. But I guess old white people eat that shit up. Look at the demographics of their viewers.

And yes, CNN was bashing Trump 24/7.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ghost_of_ukalum1988
I wouldnt know.

Did you just admit you've sniffed ACs Bhole?

Dann dude. I thought you were still in the closet.
So tell us........how does horse dung smell? 😂

2ty5hy.jpg


3m3jbr.jpg
 
Alright, an argument between these two over which is the bigger dork,,, not to be confused with which has the biggest,,,,,,, other....
 
I’ve stopped watching Fox evening talkers.
I do watch Bret Baier sometimes for evening news. I like his approach and the panel.
If there’s a big breaking disaster that requires straight news reporting I will watch CNN because they still do a good job with those.
I don’t even know what channel MSNBC is on my cable service. Pure garbage.
 
I’ve stopped watching Fox evening talkers.
I do watch Bret Baier sometimes for evening news. I like his approach and the panel.
If there’s a big breaking disaster that requires straight news reporting I will watch CNN because they still do a good job with those.
I don’t even know what channel MSNBC is on my cable service. Pure garbage.
Bret Baier? CNN? Bless your heart.

If you want breaking news, go to Twitter and read tweets from people on location. Years ago there was a service that would let you search tweets based on location. For instance if there was an active shooter situation right now in Joplin, Missouri, you could tell it to only show you tweets from that zip code with the word 'shooting' in the tweet. You could instantly get eyewitness reports from people on the scene.

You can still do it manually now, but requires more work and critical thinking skills, which is why most just wait for MSM to tell them what to think.
 
Bret Baier? CNN? Bless your heart.

If you want breaking news, go to Twitter and read tweets from people on location. Years ago there was a service that would let you search tweets based on location. For instance if there was an active shooter situation right now in Joplin, Missouri, you could tell it to only show you tweets from that zip code with the word 'shooting' in the tweet. You could instantly get eyewitness reports from people on the scene.

You can still do it manually now, but requires more work and critical thinking skills, which is why most just wait for MSM to tell them what to think.



You can use this tool to build queries for Twitter:
 
seriously, TWITTER IS NOT A SOURCE
Twitter isn't a source but is no worse and at least as informative as the news aggregator Yehaw. I'll go to the links cited in the tweets, there's a lot of good information from a variety of websites that the drive by media won't touch with a 10 foot pole because it does not support their narrative.
 
Twitter isn't a source but is no worse and at least as informative as the news aggregator Yehaw. I'll go to the links cited in the tweets, there's a lot of good information from a variety of websites that the drive by media won't touch with a 10 foot pole because it does not support their narrative.
Correct. Twitter has a ton of good information, it has a ton of bad information. It's up to the user to be smart enough to tell the good from the bad. Many can't do that, but that's user error, it's not Twitter's fault.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT