ADVERTISEMENT

Bianchi on Mullen hire

In my world, you rag on your fishing buddies or your long time friends.
You are neither to me. Telling I have to accept you or your kind of constant idiot stalker BS, is the liberal kind of crap that I refuse to accept.

So take your chill and shove it. If you don't like my kind of 'in kind' responses to your crap, the the ignore option is always open to you.
But a closet masocist like yourself will likely never go there, so FU.

And no, I'm not mad at all, I'm just still laughing at your dumb azz while you waste more time getting bitch slapped... :D

It’s incredible how stubborn and rude you can be when someone is genuinely trying to let bygones be bygones.

I’ve considered that my brand of sarcasm and humor and even my early 20s love of poking the insta bear has been unfair to you.

That’s all.
 
It’s incredible how stubborn and rude you can be when someone is genuinely trying to let bygones be bygones.

I’ve considered that my brand of sarcasm and humor and even my early 20s love of poking the insta bear has been unfair to you.

That’s all.


Annoying little brother can never stop attempting to get on the good side of the big boys, but he never realizes that his inane attempts only make him even less desirable to be around. :confused:

Besides that, I'm not buying your crocodile tears for a second. :rolleyes:
If you really wanted on my good side, you'd do us both a favor and put me on ignore... o_O (and that's never ALL for a dweeb like you)
 
Annoying little brother can never stop attempting to get on the good side of the big boys, but he never realizes that his inane attempts only make him even less desirable to be around. :confused:

Besides that, I'm not buying your crocodile tears for a second. :rolleyes:
If you really wanted on my good side, you'd do us both a favor and put me on ignore... o_O (and that's never ALL for a dweeb like you)

Alright then.
 
Now I wish I didn’t put Insta on ignore. It’s like listening to my wife on the phone
 
C'mon guys! It was easy & peaceful on the other threads. In all kinds of weather and with all kinds of personalities, we're all Gators. Time to unite.
 
C'mon guys! It was easy & peaceful on the other threads. In all kinds of weather and with all kinds of personalities, we're all Gators. Time to unite.

You must have missed that 'Moderation in ALL things' thread... :D
 
In my world, you rag on your fishing buddies or your long time friends.
You are neither to me. Telling I have to accept you or your kind of constant idiot stalker BS, is the liberal kind of crap that I refuse to accept.

So take your chill and shove it. If you don't like my kind of 'in kind' responses to your crap, the the ignore option is always open to you.
But a closet masocist like yourself will likely never go there, so FU.

And no, I'm not mad at all, I'm just still laughing at your dumb azz while you waste more time getting bitch slapped... :D

Gear down, Turbo.
 
The line dancing chimps turned into the circle of jerks.

Now they have digressed all the way to the total moe-ron village idiots...

And my solid logical response to all of that is this....
Wait for it,,,,





hysterical-laughter-smiley-emoticon.gif
 
So you are predicting that Mullen will be a bust.
Day-yam! How can someone who has more than 35,000 postings over 15 years on ITG and its predecessor(s) have so close to zero reading comprehension?

The topic here is a specific article written by Mike Bianchi [†]. My posting quotes 2 short excerpts from it, each edited down to less than 2 English sentences, because I objected to his wording (copy-editors apparently being extinct nowadays):

• 1st, I explained why he completely misused "bloodlines", which needed the context of Mullen's personal history, so I summarized that to show his genuine "bloodlines".

• 2nd, I explained my objection to "instrumental", but on further review, I mostly reversed my opinion as originally posted. Because I saw that my words had already been quoted by someone, I felt obligated to leave in my original words, so I struck them thro' when I edited it.

Nowhere did I "predict" anything about Mullen, nor did I express approval or disapproval of his hiring by UF.

It should have been easy for you to figure out exactly what I wrote vs. didn't write in my reply [‡], because like a clueless newbie, you shovelled all of it into your reply: A reply in which your own words occupied only 1 sentence.

-------
Note †: For the Orlando Sentinel (NOV. 26, 2017, 8:00 PM)

Note ‡: "#28 CompuGator Nov 27, 2017 at 4:04 PM". <https://florida.forums.rivals.com/threads/bianchi-on-mullen-hire.63523/#post-1179129>.
 
Day-yam! How can someone who has more than 35,000 postings over 15 years on ITG and its predecessor(s) have so close to zero reading comprehension?

The topic here is a specific article written by Mike Bianchi [†]. My posting quotes 2 short excerpts from it, each edited down to less than 2 English sentences, because I objected to his wording (copy-editors apparently being extinct nowadays):

• 1st, I explained why he completely misused "bloodlines", which needed the context of Mullen's personal history, so I summarized that to show his genuine "bloodlines".

• 2nd, I explained my objection to "instrumental", but on further review, I mostly reversed my opinion as originally posted. Because I saw that my words had already been quoted by someone, I felt obligated to leave in my original words, so I struck them thro' when I edited it.

Nowhere did I "predict" anything about Mullen, nor did I express approval or disapproval of his hiring by UF.

It should have been easy for you to figure out exactly what I wrote vs. didn't write in my reply [‡], because like a clueless newbie, you shovelled all of it into your reply: A reply in which your own words occupied only 1 sentence.

-------
Note †: For the Orlando Sentinel (NOV. 26, 2017, 8:00 PM)

Note ‡: "#28 CompuGator Nov 27, 2017 at 4:04 PM". <https://florida.forums.rivals.com/threads/bianchi-on-mullen-hire.63523/#post-1179129>.

Good lord.
 
• 2nd, I explained my objection to "instrumental", but on further review, I mostly reversed my opinion as originally posted. Because I saw that my words had already been quoted by someone, I felt obligated to leave in my original words, so I struck them thro' when I edited it.

Thanks for straightening that out.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT