well Trey Lyles is out, WCS has said his ankle is sore, its game day at your place guess those are all factors in the point spread being so lowOriginally posted by 46885:
Why in the hell are they only favored by 7? That's just weird
well Trey Lyles is out, WCS has said his ankle is sore, its game day at your place guess those are all factors in the point spread being so lowOriginally posted by 46885:
Why in the hell are they only favored by 7? That's just weird
That is the recruiting model of both coaches. It is not by accident.Originally posted by Xzandernm:
Yes but Donovan had the majority of the team returning each year. Cal had elite 8, final four, runner up, title, and a NIT, while having bascily a new team each year.
Originally posted by Gator Fever:
I heard Calipari actually argue one time he was doing great because he was taking a team full of mostly freshman while most of the other top tourney teams had upperclassmen.Originally posted by PacoGator19:
Donovan does more with less, while Calipari does less with more. The last 3-4 years of UF basketball is a prime example of how good of a coach Billy D is. He took UF to 3 Elite 8s and a Final Four with very very few NBA players. Beal is the only one I can think of and he was just at UF for 1 year.
You want to bet? Cal cant win without a huge advantage in talent and that is a fact that has been proven before. Now, give all the NBA talent he has to about 30 coaches and they will win titles. Cal is the best recruiter in the game, hands down. But as far as coaching goes, he is middle of the pack at best. A flipping chimp could coach this KY team to a title this year.Originally posted by Xzandernm:
Point is a 1st round loss, 3 EEs a FF is < a Nit , 1 EE, 1 FF, 1 runner up, 1 title all while haveing to replace a large amount of the team every year. No not "ANY" coach could win the same for lots of reasons. 1. Most coaches couldn't even recuit that much talent and rather you like it or not recuitment is a part of coaching in college sports. 2. Almost all coachs would have a hard time having working with a new team yearly. Not saying one coach is better then another but to say cal can't coach is just not true.Originally posted by Leesgator:
So what does that have to do with his point? His point is Cal is loaded with nba talent while Billy generally does not have the same level of talent. Almost ANY coach in the nation could win the same amount with the type of talent cal stockpiles. I promise you cal would not have won with our team last year.Originally posted by Xzandernm:
Yes but Donovan had the majority of the team returning each year. Cal had elite 8, final four, runner up, title, and a NIT, while having bascily a new team each year.Originally posted by PacoGator19:
Donovan does more with less, while Calipari does less with more. The last 3-4 years of UF basketball is a prime example of how good of a coach Billy D is. He took UF to 3 Elite 8s and a Final Four with very very few NBA players. Beal is the only one I can think of and he was just at UF for 1 year.
Damn, you're clever. Think of that one all by yourself?
Originally posted by WildCatForever69:
Cal skins Florida and makes alligator wallet..The Gators are alligator loafers..
Calling your players losers... Stay classy.Originally posted by 46885:
Billy was yet again coaching circles around shout out loud with a bunch of bums and UK was completely puzzled out there. They kept trying to run at the basket and play their AAU ball and we weren't letting them in the first half and after that they just started shooting jumpshots in the 2nd half along with Free throws because they get some every time they get it past halfcourt safely. Cal is the same and will be forever, I wonder if Florida would have 4 wins if he was coaching these losers.
who won? in the end that is all that matters.Originally posted by Leesgator:
Cal's last 3 seasons at Memphis were his best. Those teams produced 7 NBA players including D Rose. A bunch of teams make the tourney, but only a handful every year are truly title contenders. Memphis didn't become a title contender until those last 3 seasons when Cal had loaded the program with NBA caliber talent. At Umass he made a run to the final 4 with two nba players including Camby. Now most of those wins were later vacated I believe.
Last year Billy took a team to the final 4 that has produced 0 NBA players thus far. Maybe Prather will catch on and P Young is playing in Turkey I believe.
This year's ky team has 9 burger boys and may have every player on the team in the nba. Cal has to overwhelm you with talent to win. Other coaches don't. How many nba players are on this current Florida team that had sister banging ky on the ropes for a lot of the game?
Really? That's not what all you inbreed cat fans were saying at the end of last year. Flooded our board to tell us how much better you guys were since you went one game farther in the tourney. Said the 0-3 didn't matter. Congrats, I am sure it was a long 700 days for you guys.Originally posted by Xzander:
who won? in the end that is all that matters.Originally posted by Leesgator:
Cal's last 3 seasons at Memphis were his best. Those teams produced 7 NBA players including D Rose. A bunch of teams make the tourney, but only a handful every year are truly title contenders. Memphis didn't become a title contender until those last 3 seasons when Cal had loaded the program with NBA caliber talent. At Umass he made a run to the final 4 with two nba players including Camby. Now most of those wins were later vacated I believe.
Last year Billy took a team to the final 4 that has produced 0 NBA players thus far. Maybe Prather will catch on and P Young is playing in Turkey I believe.
This year's ky team has 9 burger boys and may have every player on the team in the nba. Cal has to overwhelm you with talent to win. Other coaches don't. How many nba players are on this current Florida team that had sister banging ky on the ropes for a lot of the game?
Billy articulated the problems very well in his press conference.Originally posted by UKBrassowTipIN:
As far as the game, I haven't seen Florida that much this year, but I would certainly be frustrated, as Donovan expressed in the post game. If they played like that the whole year, as they did tonight, the season outlook is much different. What seems to be this teams problems? Work ethic, chemistry?
An ideal Donovan team has 3 lottery picks, a sharpshooter and a PG who can dish drive and score. A spare big man underneath and a couple of guards who can give the starters a break.Originally posted by MJWilliamson:
But that is just the point. Both men have entirely different coaching models.Originally posted by Leesgator:
Cal is a better recruiter for certain. However, Cal is not very good coaching them up. His teams are always loaded with NBA players so he relies on just having so much more talent than his opponents every night. Give Billy and Cal equal talent and I will bet you Billy beats him 7 out of 10. Not hard to be a good coach with 9 future NBA players on the roster.
An ideal Billy team will have a single one and done (think Bradley Beal), a four year future NBA player (think Chandler Parsons) and four or five experienced good but not great journamen. Players that might make it to the NBA as reserves, but not much more than that. (think Scottie Wilbekin, Casey Prather, Patric Young and Will Yeugete)
An ideal Calipari team is just the opposite. Several one and done players and several Chandler Parsons type players. Very few four year journeyman.
No one in their right mind thinks the Florida team from last year had as much talent as the UK team. Yet Florida managed to beat UK three times, win the SEC-T and get to the final four. It took the NCAA tournament before the UK team figured it out.
So, given equal talent, I agree that Donovan beats Calipari 8 out of 10 games. But since Calipari has been there, I do not think there is one UK team that had less talent than the UF team they were facing. UK teams will almost always have better talent than UF teams.
So what were his shoes and wallet made of last year during 0-3? Faux leather?Originally posted by WildCatForever69:
Cal skins Florida and makes alligator wallet..The Gators are alligator loafers..
So you basically described Billy's 2006 and 2007 teams. And Cal's 2012 (two lottery picks and one just outside lottery) team. You kind of make my point about players making most of the difference, so thanks.Originally posted by LizardGrad89:
An ideal Donovan team has 3 lottery picks, a sharpshooter and a PG who can dish drive and score. A spare big man underneath and a couple of guards who can give the starters a break.
Calipari has shown he can take a ridiculously talented team and make them one of the better teams in the country. Donovan has shown he can take a ridiculously talented team and make them so much better than everybody else that the tournament is a foregone conclusion.
Well, except for Billy's two other final 4 teams, and his last 5 elite 8 teams, but you mean other than those 7 teams, you are right, twice.Originally posted by Beezermc:
So you basically described Billy's 2006 and 2007 teams. And Cal's 2012 (two lottery picks and one just outside lottery) team. You kind of make my point about players making most of the difference, so thanks.Originally posted by LizardGrad89:
An ideal Donovan team has 3 lottery picks, a sharpshooter and a PG who can dish drive and score. A spare big man underneath and a couple of guards who can give the starters a break.
Calipari has shown he can take a ridiculously talented team and make them one of the better teams in the country. Donovan has shown he can take a ridiculously talented team and make them so much better than everybody else that the tournament is a foregone conclusion.
No. What has been affecting our recruiting is Billy and the staff aren't pounding the pavement as hard as they used to. They need to pick-up in regards to high school recruiting. They have resigned to taking too many transfers.Originally posted by oozie7:
Anyone think our recent change in style of play might be hurting our recruiting? Just something I've been thinking about. It seems in the early Billy D years we got a lot of highly regarded guards because we pushed tempo and played a fastbreak game shooting lots of threes. It seems we've gone to a more grind it out style and I don't see us attracting the elite guards that we used to. That's one of the reasons Austin Rivers supposedly left. Beal was probably the only one we've landed recently. I know Hill was a 5-star but everybody who watched him said he was raw and similar to Walker he got a high rating because of his insane athleticism, not necessarily his basketball talent.
If Hill and Walker played even to the minimum standard of what was expected this is probably a Sweet 16 level type team. I still can't believe the play of those two.Originally posted by bradleygator:
I meant not talented enough to make the tournament even if Billy were pushing all the right buttons, which is arguable. They're saying 5 or 6 teams from the sec to the tourney, and I doubt there are 6 teams with better talent than us. UK and LSU definitely.
We're running three 5 stars out there plus dfs, acc freshman of the year, frazier, a key part of a final 4 team, carter, who scored 15 a game as a freshman in the big east, plus Chiozza and Murphy. On paper, you would think that would be a top 6 team in a mediocre conference.