ADVERTISEMENT

Arizona. Officially contested election outcome

This could go on forever but in the end it will be all for naught. Biden, despite any weaknesses real or perceived will be in the White House come the appropriate time.
 
Not as funny as how easily the media duped you into voting for someone with serious cognitive issues. You got played

See, anyone who thinks the NYT and Washington Post are lying to him, but that randos on Twitter are giving him nothing but the facts, is someone who shouldn't be calling other people "duped".
 
See, anyone who thinks the NYT and Washington Post are lying to him, but that randos on Twitter are giving him nothing but the facts, is someone who shouldn't be calling other people "duped".

Correct. The NYT and WAPO duped you. They did, and continue to do so. You continue to prove your irrelevance.
 
See, anyone who thinks the NYT and Washington Post are lying to him, but that randos on Twitter are giving him nothing but the facts, is someone who shouldn't be calling other people "duped".


Still waiting on your NY Times and WAPO to report on the swalwell china story, or the Biden China story going on in the halls of congress.
 
See, anyone who thinks the NYT and Washington Post are lying to him, but that randos on Twitter are giving him nothing but the facts, is someone who shouldn't be calling other people "duped".

Who lied to you and told you Texas had no case and that the SC wouldn't take it?

Cause that rando really did a number on you.
 
See, anyone who thinks the NYT and Washington Post are lying to him, but that randos on Twitter are giving him nothing but the facts, is someone who shouldn't be calling other people "duped".
There are a lot of “randos” that have been spot on with information.
 
There are a lot of “randos” that have been spot on with information.
There have been a lot of randos who have provided you with unsubstantiated rumors, which were later debunked. Some of you need to at least attempt to find a second source for this twitter crap, but none of you do. Some rando types "mailman admits to falsifying ballots", doesn't give a name, or a state, or anything else. and you all high five and weeks later are still mentioning it like it's true. Hell even Reagan said trust but verify. None of you ever verify. You just trust.
 
There have been a lot of randos who have provided you with unsubstantiated rumors, which were later debunked. Some of you need to at least attempt to find a second source for this twitter crap, but none of you do. Some rando types "mailman admits to falsifying ballots", doesn't give a name, or a state, or anything else. and you all high five and weeks later are still mentioning it like it's true. Hell even Reagan said trust but verify. None of you ever verify. You just trust.

18 states are suing GA, WI. MI and PA over tweets?

You sound insane.
 
  • Like
Reactions: martycat1
There have been a lot of randos who have provided you with unsubstantiated rumors, which were later debunked. Some of you need to at least attempt to find a second source for this twitter crap, but none of you do. Some rando types "mailman admits to falsifying ballots", doesn't give a name, or a state, or anything else. and you all high five and weeks later are still mentioning it like it's true. Hell even Reagan said trust but verify. None of you ever verify. You just trust.

Some of the debunks were debunked. But you would know that if took your own advice. One of the bigger debunk fails was the lead stories fact check. That thing had had more flaws than a Biden speech
 
See, anyone who thinks the NYT and Washington Post are lying to him, but that randos on Twitter are giving him nothing but the facts, is someone who shouldn't be calling other people "duped".

You don't find it odd that your professional journalists don't report on stories that we for certain know are real? That doesn’t bother you at all?

I'm not referring to unnamed mailmen who claim voter fraud, of course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
You don't find it odd that your professional journalists don't report on stories that we for certain know are real? That doesn’t bother you at all?

I'm not referring to unnamed mailmen who claim voter fraud, of course.

Why would it bother him? His content of character has been exposed. He has had multiple chances to recant with “I made a mistake”, and hasn’t. So why would he now care about truth?
 
The Democrats should invite Ghost and BamaFan1137 for right up close hands on inspection of a water pipe break in Fulton County where's there's no record of repair. Tear down boarded up windows in Detroit and invite them in. Let them and forensic experts in to inspect voting machines in Philly.

The Democrats could make fools of Ghost, BamaFan and the rest of us for suggesting fraud.

But of course the Democrats won't. And we all know why.
 
Is it legal to have a party in the eastern part of Kentucky and only invite liberals.
 
You don't find it odd that your professional journalists don't report on stories that we for certain know are real? That doesn’t bother you at all?

I'm not referring to unnamed mailmen who claim voter fraud, of course.

"You know for certain".

Because you have seen ironclad evidence, in person? Because that's what certain means.

But let me tell you what it doesn't mean. "Somebody said in on Twitter and I want it to be true so it is".
 
  • Haha
Reactions: martycat1
"You know for certain".

Because you have seen ironclad evidence, in person? Because that's what certain means.

But let me tell you what it doesn't mean. "Somebody said in on Twitter and I want it to be true so it is".

It also doesn’t mean....i saw it on the news. That’s for damn sure
 
"You know for certain".

Because you have seen ironclad evidence, in person? Because that's what certain means.

But let me tell you what it doesn't mean. "Somebody said in on Twitter and I want it to be true so it is".

LOL, are you actually claiming that there are not legitimate stories, that we know for certain are true, that have been ignored by the MSM?

You're adorable.

See, what I think you've done here, AGAIN, is assume something that wasn't stated in the post that you responded to. Keep doing that...you don't look stupid at all.

I don't get on Twitter btw...don't even have a Twitter account. Seriously this is like the 6th time you've mistaken me for a zealot like yourself.
 
LOL, are you actually claiming that there aren't legitimate stories, that we know for certain are true, have not been ignored by the MSM?

You're adorable.

See, what I think you've done here, AGAIN, is assume something that wasn't stated in the post that you responded to. Keep doing that...you don't look stupid at all.

"that we know for certain are true".

Buddy, if anybody is "adorable" here, it's you.
 
"that we know for certain are true".

Buddy, if anybody is "adorable" here, it's you.

Hint...the MSM is now openly reporting it.

Even you can now admit that we know it to be true.

Good Lord man, I tried to slow walk you there and then spoonfed you...but you weren't having it, lol.

Adorable.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT