Where has Un-informed been anyway?
Getting Un-informed by CNN.Where has Un-informed been anyway?
Giving @UF_GATOR_FAN a Dutch rudder for 1000 AlexGetting Un-informed by CNN.
You made me look that up. 🤣Giving @UF_GATOR_FAN a Dutch rudder for 1000 Alex
Hahaha, yesssss!You made me look that up. 🤣
I guess he/she didn't get much sympathy from us on the sports board.Where has Un-informed been anyway?
Funny how fast you find things like that, but never seem to find things like this:
https://www.azcentral.com/story/new...verturn-results-affirms-biden-win/6487995002/
Not as funny as how easily the media duped you into voting for someone with serious cognitive issues. You got played
See, anyone who thinks the NYT and Washington Post are lying to him, but that randos on Twitter are giving him nothing but the facts, is someone who shouldn't be calling other people "duped".
See, anyone who thinks the NYT and Washington Post are lying to him, but that randos on Twitter are giving him nothing but the facts, is someone who shouldn't be calling other people "duped".
See, anyone who thinks the NYT and Washington Post are lying to him, but that randos on Twitter are giving him nothing but the facts, is someone who shouldn't be calling other people "duped".
There are a lot of “randos” that have been spot on with information.See, anyone who thinks the NYT and Washington Post are lying to him, but that randos on Twitter are giving him nothing but the facts, is someone who shouldn't be calling other people "duped".
There have been a lot of randos who have provided you with unsubstantiated rumors, which were later debunked. Some of you need to at least attempt to find a second source for this twitter crap, but none of you do. Some rando types "mailman admits to falsifying ballots", doesn't give a name, or a state, or anything else. and you all high five and weeks later are still mentioning it like it's true. Hell even Reagan said trust but verify. None of you ever verify. You just trust.There are a lot of “randos” that have been spot on with information.
There have been a lot of randos who have provided you with unsubstantiated rumors, which were later debunked. Some of you need to at least attempt to find a second source for this twitter crap, but none of you do. Some rando types "mailman admits to falsifying ballots", doesn't give a name, or a state, or anything else. and you all high five and weeks later are still mentioning it like it's true. Hell even Reagan said trust but verify. None of you ever verify. You just trust.
There have been a lot of randos who have provided you with unsubstantiated rumors, which were later debunked. Some of you need to at least attempt to find a second source for this twitter crap, but none of you do. Some rando types "mailman admits to falsifying ballots", doesn't give a name, or a state, or anything else. and you all high five and weeks later are still mentioning it like it's true. Hell even Reagan said trust but verify. None of you ever verify. You just trust.
Not as funny as how easily the media duped you into voting for someone with serious cognitive issues. You got played
See, anyone who thinks the NYT and Washington Post are lying to him, but that randos on Twitter are giving him nothing but the facts, is someone who shouldn't be calling other people "duped".
You don't find it odd that your professional journalists don't report on stories that we for certain know are real? That doesn’t bother you at all?
I'm not referring to unnamed mailmen who claim voter fraud, of course.
Why would it bother him?
You don't find it odd that your professional journalists don't report on stories that we for certain know are real? That doesn’t bother you at all?
I'm not referring to unnamed mailmen who claim voter fraud, of course.
"You know for certain".
Because you have seen ironclad evidence, in person? Because that's what certain means.
But let me tell you what it doesn't mean. "Somebody said in on Twitter and I want it to be true so it is".
It also doesn’t mean....i saw it on the news. That’s for damn sure
Well then, nobody on here can say anything is certain. I can live with that.
"You know for certain".
Because you have seen ironclad evidence, in person? Because that's what certain means.
But let me tell you what it doesn't mean. "Somebody said in on Twitter and I want it to be true so it is".
LOL, are you actually claiming that there aren't legitimate stories, that we know for certain are true, have not been ignored by the MSM?
You're adorable.
See, what I think you've done here, AGAIN, is assume something that wasn't stated in the post that you responded to. Keep doing that...you don't look stupid at all.
"that we know for certain are true".
Buddy, if anybody is "adorable" here, it's you.