ADVERTISEMENT

Actual electoral count: Trump 410 Biden 128

The polling data was obviously garbage. Even the lefty-est of lefties is admitting that now.

So....one down, right?
Garbage? Biden got 8% more votes than Trump, right in line with what many polls said. The polls called every state correctly within their margin of error, except 1.
 
#7 is not controversial. Give it a little thought.
Not particularly. The entropy theory, or the degradation of energy is essential for time to end. Without it time would have no in. Another interesting answer to that would be the big bang or whatever led to the existence of time.

I think the best answer for number seven for me, as a spiritual man, is that God, whatever here she may be, must exist for time to exist.
 
I never said I made a perfect score.

I gave the axiom and the argument for math's simplest equation.

Passing a simple test is far from my major accomplishment in life.

I don't know who's older. nail or Ghost. I have no idea which time zone in which either were born. An ability to reason is needed for my answers. Not my support. Most here fully understand my answers.

Math’s simplest equation is not an axiom. I don’t believe you. Show support for your answer. Plus, Everyone understands there are different time zones.

It must be your biggest accomplishment since that’s all you talk about. Were you dropped on your head as a child?

Answer this. What is

6/2(2+1)=
 
Math’s simplest equation is not an axiom. I don’t believe you. Show support for your answer. Plus, Everyone understands there are different time zones.

It must be your biggest accomplishment since that’s all you talk about. Were you dropped on your head as a child?

Answer this. What is

6/2(2+1)=

triggered. It’s ok man. You don’t need these skills to flip burgers
 
I’m talking post election data so your point is mute. That data shows fraud based on the analytics.
It doesn’t “show” fraud. it may indicate the “possibility” but it doesnt “show” anything.
 
It doesn’t “show” fraud. it may indicate the “possibility” but it doesnt “show” anything.
Your wrong, it shows massive fraud. The only way you can achieve those ratio percentages post Biden ballot dump is through an algorithm. Pretty plain and simple when you see the numbers. Like I said before, if the post data is valid, Biden is toast. You can’t certify those states that have those impossibilities. Than it goes to state legislatures, and Biden will be done. By the way, my buddy in on the Milwaukee recount team. Look for Wisconsin to be the next domino to fall. A lot of things he can’t talk about, and it doesn’t look good for Biden.
 
Your wrong, it shows massive fraud. The only way you can achieve those ratio percentages post Biden ballot dump is through an algorithm. Pretty plain and simple when you see the numbers. Like I said before, if the post data is valid, Biden is toast. You can’t certify those states that have those impossibilities. Than it goes to state legislatures, and Biden will be done. By the way, my buddy in on the Milwaukee recount team. Look for Wisconsin to be the next domino to fall. A lot of things he can’t talk about, and it doesn’t look good for Biden.
Nope. Algorithms aren’t votes. Plain and simple.
 
Nope. Algorithms aren’t votes. Plain and simple.
That’s a ridiculous comment. Ghost is right, and there is way more evidence than the data too, but I guess none of it matters because the Trump hatred is the controlling factor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
That’s been done by plenty on here. If ur not bright enough to follow... well I can’t help u.
Lets talk about how Biden jumped 100% on a voter data drop in Wisconsin n Michigan at 3am. Do u think that’s possible?
The post election data is undeniable. The problem the Dems had is that they had to overcome such wide margins, they had to set algorithms in so many places. The thing about randomness, is that it can’t be achieved on a large scale to guarantee doctored results. So these systems had to be set with the same pattern, and that is the downfall. They forgot about the showing the obvious to achieve their fraudulent results. I think they went stupid on election night, good for the nerds though.
 
The post election data is undeniable. The problem the Dems had is that they had to overcome such wide margins, they had to set algorithms in so many places. The thing about randomness, is that it can’t be achieved on a large scale to guarantee doctored results. So these systems had to be set with the same pattern, and that is the downfall. They forgot about the showing the obvious to achieve their fraudulent results. I think they went stupid on election night, good for the nerds though.
I think the word you’re looking for is irrefutable, it is most certainly not undeniable. And that’s where this gets interesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ncgatr1 and jfegaly
The next question would be, if the data was so obvious, how wide were the actual margins? Maybe that is where they are coming up with the 400 count for Trump?
 
That’s been done by plenty on here. If ur not bright enough to follow... well I can’t help u.
Lets talk about how Biden jumped 100% on a voter data drop in Wisconsin n Michigan at 3am. Do u think that’s possible?
Sure. Let’s say a Biden supporter went around soliciting votes, had them sign their mail in ballots, then dumped them all at an approved drop off site. Nothing illegal about that.

Show me where those ballots were not signed by legal voters and you might have a case.
 
The next question would be, if the data was so obvious, how wide were the actual margins? Maybe that is where they are coming up with the 400 count for Trump?
Yeah, like California voted for Trump.

You guys live in La La Land.
 

That’s a ridiculous comment. Ghost is right, and there is way more evidence than the data too, but I guess none of it matters because the Trump hatred is the controlling factor.
First of all, Ghost has never been right. About anything. He’s just scrambling because he knows he’s about to be permabanned.

The evidence has all been anecdotal and drips and drabs. Just like every election. No systemic fraud.

Just like the guy said, the most secure election in history.
 
Sure. Let’s say a Biden supporter went around soliciting votes, had them sign their mail in ballots, then dumped them all at an approved drop off site. Nothing illegal about that.

Show me where those ballots were not signed by legal voters and you might have a case.
The probability of all 100% of those votes going towards biden in a data drop is a completely unrealistic to think otherwise shows how stupid u are. Keep ur head in ur ass if u want. The cheating is being revealed. :)
 
The probability of all 100% of those votes going towards biden in a data drop is a completely unrealistic to think otherwise shows how stupid u are. Keep ur head in ur ass if u want. The cheating is being revealed. :)
No it shows what half of this country will say, or realistically maybe 1/3 of this country will say, which is despite the fact that mathematics is never wrong and the best level of proof you can get, it’s quite easy to deny it because it’s just math.

people are silly. People will deny math when it’s blatantly obvious but they’ll believe a video of somebody sneaking around the back looking suspicious.

This is going to get interesting.
 
Sure. Let’s say a Biden supporter went around soliciting votes, had them sign their mail in ballots, then dumped them all at an approved drop off site. Nothing illegal about that.

It's legal to accept mail-in ballots after election day in Wisconsin?

You sure about that, Fry-Guy?
 
  • Like
Reactions: gator1776
In other news, a democrat in Cincinatti....

FBI agents on Thursday arrested Cincinnati Democrat City Councilman P.G. Sittenfeld for accepting bribes in exchange for votes.

Thursday’s arrest of Sittenfeld marks the third arrest on the city council this year.

Sittenfeld, who could not be immediately reached for comment, is running to be Cincinnati’s mayor and considered by some as the front runner with thousands of dollars raised for his campaign.

He is now the third Cincinnati City Councilmember to be arrested on corruption charges this year and the second in the past week alone.

Federal authorities recently revealed in court records they were investigating corruption and bribery related to votes and development projects and said more prosecution were coming.

U.S. Attorney David DeVillers said at a news conference last week that accepting campaign donations in exchange for favors also violates federal law.




 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT