Nobody cares what you think, Fudd.
All of that nonsense is infringement.
Further it punishes people that didn't do anything.
Active shooter on sow campus?
- Thread starter Moosepoo80
- Start date
All of that nonsense is infringement.
Further it punishes people that didn't do anything.
There are already laws that cover minors getting guns from relatives etc. The left just wants anything that makes it hard for someone to have a handgun. If you guys could you would require millions in insurance so most law abiding people were priced out of obtaining protection for themselves.
I couldn't think of a better place to go homicidal than a gun free zone. Target rich environment if there ever was one.
I was about to post the same X post. You know you are a ruhtahd when Carville calls you a useless twerp. 😂 Dims only laud democracy when THEY are in charge. It's why they want unfettered illegal immigration to pad their voter rolls, but more importantly the census so places of utter lunacy like CA and NY will have more electoral votes and seats in the House.
I was about to post the same X post. You know you are a ruhtahd when Carville calls you a useless twerp. 😂 Dims only laud democracy when THEY are in charge. It's why they want unfettered illegal immigration to pad their voter rolls, but more importantly the census so places of utter lunacy like CA and NY will have more electoral votes and seats in the House.
I hope Hogg can really implement his plan of spending tens of millions in Primaries against the Dem politicians that aren't woke enough for his taste.
This. FSU and every college campus in Florida are “gun free zones” that only mean something to law abiding citizens- whether they have a firearm or not.
This guy is a deranged loser.
Your stated solution here is more gun laws and fewer guns in the hands of law-abiding gun owners.
Both of those moves will lead to MORE gun violence and MORE gun deaths.
So I wouldn't be calling anyone else an idiot if I were you.
And they have good reasons for this, and I kmnow what they are. And this is EXACTLY WHY I will never surrender ANY gun that I own.
I think the decision has already been made, and this is their direction. It makes one wonder just how stupid these people truly are.
Very stupid. They are literally defending NON-CITIZEN GANG MEMBERS and attacking Trump for deporting them!
They are literally gift-wrapping a super majority in both the House and Senate and hand-delivering it to Trump for the midterms.
Guys if you don't like the way Dictator Trump is governing now, you sure as shit won't like how he does with a super majority in Congress.
And right now @kalimgoodman @G8trDad3 @bradleygator are working overtime to give it to him.
Keep going.
Hmmm. Fl Carry vs Thrasher. John Thrasher, then President of F$U improperly banned properly stored firearms in vehicles. Got his ass sued off.
I just can't believe a shooting happened in a gun-free zone. They put up a sign and everything!A mass shooting happens.
The immediate gun nut reaction:
not an ounce of truth here. We KNOW it is not the gun....only a glorified IDIOT would believe an inanimate object would be to blame.A mass shooting happens.
The immediate gun nut reaction:
Last edited:
I've always said that scattered 'gun free zones' are unlikely to be very effective but I guess the data shows otherwise.
"The study’s most striking finding was that gun-free zones were less likely to experience an active shooting than gun-allowing zones. Of the 150 shootings examined, 48% took place in gun-free zones, while 61.3% of the control locations (where shootings did not occur) were gun-free. This indicates that gun-free zones are not disproportionately targeted by shooters.
In fact, establishments that prohibited firearms were found to be 62.5% less likely to have an active shooting incident compared to places where guns were allowed. This association remained strong even after adjusting for potential confounding factors, such as the distance of the establishment to the nearest police station.
“I wasn’t expecting to find a protective effect because the sample size is small and gun-free zone enforcement can be widely variable,” Reeping told PsyPost. “Nevertheless, even with these limitations, a protective effect was still found.”
Contrary to claims that shooters deliberately target gun-free zones, the findings suggest that these areas may actually be safer from mass shootings. This could have significant implications for public policy, particularly in light of recent legal challenges to gun-free zones. The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen made it more difficult to impose restrictions on carrying firearms in public, but gun-free zones remain a notable exception.
“Gun-free zones, on average, do not attract active shootings,” Reeping said. “In fact, they may be protective against active shootings. This is in line with most research that finds that more guns result in more gun crimes.”
https://www.psypost.org/first-of-it...ee-zones-reduce-likelihood-of-mass-shootings/
Signs save lives! Anyone knows that a criminal will pause, read a sign that says 'guns aren't allowed past this point', and turn around and go home.
Counter to to your bullshit.
Well lets see what makes sense....would someone wanting to commit a crime with a gun want others to shoot back at him...or not? Even you cannot be this thick-headed.....
Oh yes he can, hes got an 81 page troll thread to prove it.
lol... What are the chances of schools where some teachers have guns also in addition to any security getting a shooter compared to where teachers don't have guns? I doubt there are hardly any shootings at schools where teachers have guns also. Where the public can conceal carry gets a shooter taken out much faster than gun free zones.
Mass shooters are cowards, they don't like targets that shoot back and they usually surrender if you corner them.
Luckily there are cops like Nashville pd that arent interested in your terms of surrender.
How do you figure that? Theo is trolling and everyone else thinks that gun free zones are dumb ideas.
A little deeper than this...we KNOW he is trolling, and we are calling HIMK out for the stupid things he is posting...at least I am. Trynig to convince ANYONE that shooters avoid gun free zones may be THE DUMBEST troll he has ever tried. OR...it is something totally different that site rules prohibit me from posting here.
Hey Theo.
Would you consider Israel to be a civilized country?
Would you consider 2 school shootings in 77 years to be a good or bad thing?
Asking for a friend.
Would you consider Israel to be a civilized country?
Would you consider 2 school shootings in 77 years to be a good or bad thing?
Asking for a friend.
No way. If he has just seen the signs he never would have done what he did. He will kill innocent people, but never would violate a sign…….
It even had an X over the gun so you know they’re not effing around.
Similar threads
