A Sovereign Citizen Speaks his heart and mind,,,
- Thread starter instaGATOR
- Start date
Trump is the Roadrunner. The swamp all take turns playing Wiley Coyote. Russian collusion. Fabricated evidence and search warrents by the FBI. Two impeachment charades. Nothing works. And they are so damn frustrated. And now the FBI raids Melania's intimates. And still....they get nothing. When will they learn...the roadrunner baits the low IQ coyote into self destructive behavior. beep beep
Pissed off? About what?
A stupid viewpoint that has no factual basis?
🤣 Is that the best you have as a response?
This is nothing more than the lying spew of a cowardice traitor.
The rule of law is exactly what I support, under the Constitution that the sovereign citizens used to set up and give the federal govt. it's very limited authority. When they violate their Oaths of Office to the Constitution, then they lose their authority and become tyrants.
Vigilantes and anarchy are the tools of those that would subvert the authority of the sovereign citizens that they are supposed to be serving.
I reveled nothing AFTER your stupidity. The thread and the post were mine from the beginning. Only a moron would not understand that I was posting in the 1st person and giving my own thoughts for anyone to read.
The DeSantis post was also obvious to anyone not brain dead, or a blatant liar.
Last edited:
This is supporting the rule of law?
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sc/pr/columbia-woman-sentenced-more-three-years-tax-refund-scheme
Columbia Woman Sentenced to More than Three Years in Tax Refund Scheme
During her case, Felder-Lucas filed several documents with the Court alleging she was a “sovereign citizen”. The sovereign citizen movement is a broad term applying to a loose association of tax protesters, financial scheme promoters, and conspiracy theorists. Typically, adherents of the theory claim to be answerable only to their view of law and to not be subject to any government statutes, rules, or proceedings. The Court rejected these claims.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdtx/pr/three-fugitives-arrested-massive-multistate-fraud-scheme
Three fugitives arrested in massive multistate fraud scheme
HOUSTON – Three more co-conspirators have been taken into custody on charges related to a multi-layered mortgage fraud, credit repair and government loan fraud scheme, announced U.S. Attorney Jennifer B Lowery.
Heather Ann Campos, David Lewis Best Jr. and Stephen Laverne Crabtree had evaded law enforcement for several months.
All three allegedly sent numerous sovereign citizen letters to federal agencies and the federal court in Houston declaring themselves immune from prosecution and refusing to recognize the authority of the federal courts.
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-st...to-be-sovereign-citizen-charged-in-check-case
Man Claims to Be Sovereign Citizen, Charged in Check Case
A southeastern Michigan man who prosecutors said claimed to be a sovereign citizen of the United States has been charged after sending three $1 million checks to the state to pay his taxes.
By Associated Press
Feb. 10, 2022, at 1:23 p.m.
The sovereign citizen "thing" has primarily been a angry white nationalist movement
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...ereign-citizen-protests-ottawa-truck-blockade
There’s no solidarity in ‘sovereign citizen’ protests — only incoherent rage
When a group in black fatigues called Alpha Men Assemble began practising paramilitary manoeuvres in a park in Staffordshire at the beginning of this year, it looked pretty threatening. These men, we were warned, were about to launch an insurrection against vaccines and in favour of “the sovereign citizen”. Since then, silence. It wouldn’t be surprising if the group had dispersed: a society of self-proclaimed alphas is bound to fall apart.
This was just one example of the incoherent protests now sweeping rich, English-speaking nations. Others include the truck blockade in Ottawa and its duplicates in Australia, New Zealand and the US, and the angry men outside the British parliament, waiting to pounce on passing politicians. By incoherent protest, I mean gatherings whose aims are simultaneously petty and grandiose. Their immediate objectives are small and often risible, attacking such minor inconveniences as face masks. The underlying aims are open-ended, massive and impossible to fulfil. Not just politically impossible, but mathematically impossible. Listening to these men (and most of them are men), it seems that every one of them wants to be king.
The “sovereign citizen” theory is a powerful current running through these movements. Its adherents insist that they stand above the law. Some of them refuse to buy vehicle licences, or pay taxes or fines. They believe they are exempt from public health measures, such as lockdowns and vaccine passes.
In other words, they arrogate to themselves sovereign powers that not even the monarch enjoys. They produce elaborate pseudo-legal documents to justify these claims. The “memorandum of understanding” published by two of the leading organisers of the Ottawa blockade, which makes impossible legal demands of the government, looks like a classic of the genre. It was supposedly signed by 320,000 people before the organisers withdrew it.
What explains the appeal of this movement? Such claims of individual sovereignty arose in the 1970s with an antisemitic, racist agitation called Posse Comitatus. They appear to surge in hard times. Some people believe they can annul their debts or tax arrears by renouncing their citizenship. But I suspect it’s about more than money. The promise of capitalism is that one day we will all be alphas – just not yet. It is a formula for frustration and humiliation. The less equal the economic system becomes, the wider the gap between the promise and its fulfilment yawns. Humiliation, as Pankaj Mishra argued in his excellent book Age of Anger, is the motor of extremism. Noisy assertions of sovereignty look like an obvious attempt to overcome humiliation.
There was a time, in the rich nations, when it seemed as if we could all triumph. From the second world war until the late 1970s, general prosperity rose steadily. The top 1% captured a decreasing proportion of total income. But then, in the US, the UK, Canada, Ireland and Australia, the curve suddenly turned, and the 1% began to grab an ever greater share. The trend has continued to this day, sustained by the neoliberal doctrines that were first imposed in the rich world by Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan.
The ultra-rich have gained most: since the beginning of the pandemic, the world’s 10 richest men have doubled their wealth, while 163 million people have been pushed below the poverty line. Wages for many people in the Anglosphere have stagnated, but the costs of living, especially housing, have soared.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ests-justin-trudeau-use-rare-emergency-powers
But even during the “glory years” (1945 to 1975) the universal triumph capitalism promised was an illusion. The general rise of prosperity in rich nations was financed, in part, by poor ones. Decolonisation was resisted by the rich world with extreme violence and oppression, then partly reversed through coups and assassinations (such as the overthrow of Mohammad Mosaddegh in Iran in 1953, the crushing of Jacobo Árbenz’s government in Guatemala in 1954, the murder of Patrice Lumumba in Congo in 1961, Suharto’s coup in Indonesia in 1967 and Augusto Pinochet’s in Chile in 1973). Today, such extreme measures are seldom required, as the transfer of wealth is secured by other means. The rich world’s wealth continues in large part to rely on the exploitation of black and brown people.
Incoherent protest movements tend to be infested with racism and white supremacy. Some of the key organisers of the Ottawa action are reported to have a grisly history of racist statements, and some of the protesters have flown swastikas and Confederate flags. When black and brown people assume positions of power and authority, and appear more alpha than those who expected tribute from them, this is perceived as an intolerable reversal. The current wave of incoherent protest began in the US with the reaction against Barack Obama’s government, and soon evolved, with the encouragement of Donald Trump and others, into undisguised white supremacism.
Some of the Ottawa organisers also have a history of attacks on trade unions. The “independence” they demand means freedom from the decencies owed to other people, freedom from the obligations of civic life. In pursuing these selfish freedoms, they reinforce the neoliberal policies – such as the crushing of organised labour – that helped cause the impoverishment and insecurity suffered by those they claim to represent.
Canadian truckers, for example, especially immigrant workers, now suffer from wage theft, unsafe conditions and other brutal forms of exploitation, caused in part by a loss of collective bargaining power. But the protest organisers seem uninterested. Sovereignty and solidarity are not compatible.
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...ereign-citizen-protests-ottawa-truck-blockade
There’s no solidarity in ‘sovereign citizen’ protests — only incoherent rage
When a group in black fatigues called Alpha Men Assemble began practising paramilitary manoeuvres in a park in Staffordshire at the beginning of this year, it looked pretty threatening. These men, we were warned, were about to launch an insurrection against vaccines and in favour of “the sovereign citizen”. Since then, silence. It wouldn’t be surprising if the group had dispersed: a society of self-proclaimed alphas is bound to fall apart.
This was just one example of the incoherent protests now sweeping rich, English-speaking nations. Others include the truck blockade in Ottawa and its duplicates in Australia, New Zealand and the US, and the angry men outside the British parliament, waiting to pounce on passing politicians. By incoherent protest, I mean gatherings whose aims are simultaneously petty and grandiose. Their immediate objectives are small and often risible, attacking such minor inconveniences as face masks. The underlying aims are open-ended, massive and impossible to fulfil. Not just politically impossible, but mathematically impossible. Listening to these men (and most of them are men), it seems that every one of them wants to be king.
The “sovereign citizen” theory is a powerful current running through these movements. Its adherents insist that they stand above the law. Some of them refuse to buy vehicle licences, or pay taxes or fines. They believe they are exempt from public health measures, such as lockdowns and vaccine passes.
In other words, they arrogate to themselves sovereign powers that not even the monarch enjoys. They produce elaborate pseudo-legal documents to justify these claims. The “memorandum of understanding” published by two of the leading organisers of the Ottawa blockade, which makes impossible legal demands of the government, looks like a classic of the genre. It was supposedly signed by 320,000 people before the organisers withdrew it.
What explains the appeal of this movement? Such claims of individual sovereignty arose in the 1970s with an antisemitic, racist agitation called Posse Comitatus. They appear to surge in hard times. Some people believe they can annul their debts or tax arrears by renouncing their citizenship. But I suspect it’s about more than money. The promise of capitalism is that one day we will all be alphas – just not yet. It is a formula for frustration and humiliation. The less equal the economic system becomes, the wider the gap between the promise and its fulfilment yawns. Humiliation, as Pankaj Mishra argued in his excellent book Age of Anger, is the motor of extremism. Noisy assertions of sovereignty look like an obvious attempt to overcome humiliation.
There was a time, in the rich nations, when it seemed as if we could all triumph. From the second world war until the late 1970s, general prosperity rose steadily. The top 1% captured a decreasing proportion of total income. But then, in the US, the UK, Canada, Ireland and Australia, the curve suddenly turned, and the 1% began to grab an ever greater share. The trend has continued to this day, sustained by the neoliberal doctrines that were first imposed in the rich world by Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan.
The ultra-rich have gained most: since the beginning of the pandemic, the world’s 10 richest men have doubled their wealth, while 163 million people have been pushed below the poverty line. Wages for many people in the Anglosphere have stagnated, but the costs of living, especially housing, have soared.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ests-justin-trudeau-use-rare-emergency-powers
But even during the “glory years” (1945 to 1975) the universal triumph capitalism promised was an illusion. The general rise of prosperity in rich nations was financed, in part, by poor ones. Decolonisation was resisted by the rich world with extreme violence and oppression, then partly reversed through coups and assassinations (such as the overthrow of Mohammad Mosaddegh in Iran in 1953, the crushing of Jacobo Árbenz’s government in Guatemala in 1954, the murder of Patrice Lumumba in Congo in 1961, Suharto’s coup in Indonesia in 1967 and Augusto Pinochet’s in Chile in 1973). Today, such extreme measures are seldom required, as the transfer of wealth is secured by other means. The rich world’s wealth continues in large part to rely on the exploitation of black and brown people.
Incoherent protest movements tend to be infested with racism and white supremacy. Some of the key organisers of the Ottawa action are reported to have a grisly history of racist statements, and some of the protesters have flown swastikas and Confederate flags. When black and brown people assume positions of power and authority, and appear more alpha than those who expected tribute from them, this is perceived as an intolerable reversal. The current wave of incoherent protest began in the US with the reaction against Barack Obama’s government, and soon evolved, with the encouragement of Donald Trump and others, into undisguised white supremacism.
Some of the Ottawa organisers also have a history of attacks on trade unions. The “independence” they demand means freedom from the decencies owed to other people, freedom from the obligations of civic life. In pursuing these selfish freedoms, they reinforce the neoliberal policies – such as the crushing of organised labour – that helped cause the impoverishment and insecurity suffered by those they claim to represent.
Canadian truckers, for example, especially immigrant workers, now suffer from wage theft, unsafe conditions and other brutal forms of exploitation, caused in part by a loss of collective bargaining power. But the protest organisers seem uninterested. Sovereignty and solidarity are not compatible.
The Federal Govt. was instituted by the Sovereign Citizens of the 13 Colonies by their own hand and at their own direction, something that you seem to stupid to realize. As the Sovereign, they can also dissolve that Govt at any time if it fails to be of public service to their unquestioned, unalienable, God given sovereignty.
Sovereignty: the state of being free from the control or power of another. Synonyms: autonomy, freedom, independence… (again, you're to stupid to understand the terms)
What it doesn't mean is that the Feds then have control over the Sovereign Masters that they are hired to serve, as PUBLIC SERVANTS.
When the Fed attempts to assume the mantle of Royalty (which I believe that they are currently attempting) forgetting who it is that THEY SERVE, then it becomes the right and the duty of the Sovereign Citizens to put them back in their place, or dissolve their charter due to their traitorous malfeasance of office.
Malfeasance -- n. Misconduct or wrongdoing, especially by a public official. [Anglo-Norman malfaisance, from Old French malfaisant, malfeasant, present participle of malfaire, to do evil, from Latin malefacere; see malefactor .] mal·fea′sant adj. & n. American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Editiofeasantsxsn.
The consent is on the part of the hired help PUBLIC SERVANTS, not their Sovereign Citizen Masters. They don't get to pick and choose which parts of the govt. limiting Constitution that they will follow, and what they can ignore. The sovereign wrote the Constitution to control THEM, knowing that giving any institution power is dangerous for those giving up a portion of their power/sovereignty. Tyrants and dictators are always looking for a way in....
The fact that the swamp Rats are refusing to enforce the immigration LAWS that the sovereign citizens put in place is cause to disband them, and put them on trial imo.
The Fact that the FBI and the DoJ are taking criminal actions against the sovereign means to me, that they should be disbanded at the very least.
Cowardice traitors like you, that have never done squat to serve your country or your fellow sovereign citizens, are as much of a problem as they, because you are a facilitator of their Govt. corruptions and usurpation.
Usurpation -- The illegal encroachment or assumption of the use of authority, power, or property properly belonging to another; the interruption or disturbance of an individual in his or her right or possession.
You would never swear to commit 'your life, your fortune, and your sacred honor,' because you don't even know what sacred honor is.... 🤓
What your are is a despicable coward and a traitor, not because I recognized it and stated it, but by your own despicable actions.
So sovereign citizens had to collectively authorize government but have the right individually to choose to ignore it?
Is this just a ploy on your part to get out of paying your income tax? 🤣
Is this just a ploy on your part to get out of paying your income tax? 🤣
The gutless keyboard conservatives here, deserve the same level of respect as the RINO politicians that they are so good at whining about.
How about you grow a set and speak up, or just sit down and STFU about what's wrong with present day America...🤓.
How about you grow a set and speak up, or just sit down and STFU about what's wrong with present day America...🤓.
Can't wait for you to create another 37 threads next week only to have them locked again, and again.
I had not seen this thread...it is a WINNER! Someone put lil dicky in his place! DMF has always been in his place..he cannot get out.
