LSU better get Herman before USC comes calling or Texas.
I honestly think that is what he is waiting to see. If Big 12 says they will expand in the upcoming meeting...he will stick around.Hermann might do well to stay in Houston, if they join the Big 12.
If they expand to 12 probably not. If they expand to 14 it's a possibility.Houston is not getting invited to join the Big 12.
Someone is going to hire Briles.
Don't think Texas isn't on that.
Yep.Someone is going to hire Briles.
Don't think Texas isn't on that.
Your AD sucks. He's going to botch this hire up just like he botched up the handling of the entire Les Miles situation.I think LSU would do well to at the very least reach out to the following
1. P.J. fleck-HC Western Michigan. He's young, energetic and could be a long term guy
2. Dabo swinney-HC Clemson sorta weird but has done wonders at Clemson. Might be ready to coach in an elite conference
3 Bill Cowher-Former HC Pittsburgh Steelers. It's a long shot but at least make him say no.
4 Scott Frost- HC Central Florida High-energy guy with a GREAT offensive mind.
What's his salary?Why would Dabo leave Clemson to go to LSU?
Your AD sucks. He's going to botch this hire up just like he botched up the handling of the entire Les Miles situation.
P.J. Fleck is totally underrated. Most people don't even know who he is. He would be a great hire. Somebody will get him and be happy.
Hahaha.... Zook, Chump, Mac. Can't botch it much worse than us
Are you sure about that? Zook was pretty freakin bad as well. He lost 5 games every year and didn't even make it through his 3rd year if I remember correctly.I was just thinking how Zook might come out looking like the best of the three. He was the best recruiter, by far, and put the most watchable product on the field. He didn't win the division, or win double digits, but he had to deal with a much tougher SECE.
I can't believe that any fan with a shred of intelligence would put McElwain in the same boat as Zook and Muschamp.
And I say that acknowledging that the jury is still out of McElwain.
No because Zook's 2002 team lost to a bad Ole Miss team and LSU. So no the 2002 team wouldn't have won the SEC East last year. Zook never beat a ranked team at home so based off that fact Zook's 2002 team wouldn't have won the Ole Miss game last year.Why? How has McElwain distinguished himself so far? Because he won 10 games last year? If you added the extra cupcake to Zook's schedules he would have won nine games twice. Zook beat 1-loss Georgia and LSU teams that were better than anyone Muschamp or McElwain have beat and he beat FSU on the road. You don't think Zook's 2002 team could have won that garbage SEC east last year?
Additionally, Zook recruited better, open and shut. I'm not saying I want Zook back but to say McElwain is somehow above the comparison is just a conclusory statement on your part. What are you basing that on?
Why? How has McElwain distinguished himself so far? Because he won 10 games last year?
If you added the extra cupcake to Zook's schedules he would have won nine games twice. Zook beat 1-loss Georgia and LSU teams that were better than anyone Muschamp or McElwain have beat and he beat FSU on the road.
You don't think Zook's 2002 team could have won that garbage SEC east last year?
. McElwain hasn't lost to anyone as bad as Zook and Muschamp's worst losses.
You continue to compare seven years of game across two coaches to one year of games across one coach. I am not sure what kinds of conclusions you think you can draw from that kind of comparison.
Should we wait until McElwain has been coaching at least three years before we claim Zook was better than McElwain? (It makes my eyes hurt to type "Zook was better than McElwain.")
My goodness, I just cannot fathom this kind of reasoning.
Yes. Not just last year. But in his first year. Did Zook? No. Zook did not even win 9 games his first year. And he had a NFL QB on his roster the whole year.
I guess the Ole Miss and UT wins don't count either? And are you *really* counting a road FSU in 2004 win as significant? A team that went 9-3 and lost to Maryland? BTW, that was Zook's third year. Why is that significant?
Because you are counting the significant wins across three years of Zook. Should we wait three years for McElwain? Or is it appropriate to compare three years of significant wiins by Zook to one year of McElwain?
Don't know. And neither do you. But what we both know is that Zook never won the SEC East. He never played in Atlanta. He also never had to replace a starting QB during the season even once, much less twice.
OK, so you *tried* to make a case for Zook. You failed, but at least you tried.