I addressed every single talking point in your argument. Your response was for me to cite easily accessible and basic knowledge known to anyone who’s read the news in the last 4 years. Do I need to cite that the sky is blue too?? Your arguments were flailing at best and massively hypocritical. As I have and many other posters have called you out on. So why would I engage in debate with someone who is apparently so entrenched in their political ideology they’re unwilling to see the facts? Life is only so short.
Enjoy this ass beating. Trump 2024. It’s here.
OK, lets lower the temperature a bit here.
First, FYI, I am not/was not a Kamala supporter. I don't like Trump at all, but I don't think Kamala was the answer either........so its not that big a deal to me. I couldn't vote for either one.
And for the record......congratulations to all Trump supporters. He won fair and square and by a wide margin, which is good for the country at this point in time. The worst result would have been another nail bitter. I will support him now as he is our president and I hope he does a good job. I am not very confident he will, but hope he proves me wrong. In the end if he does well for the country I will be happy.....I could give a shit who wins the next election. What is important is that whoever is running our country the next 4 years makes good decisions.
Now to the question above.........I disagree with your take that this is common knowledge (as you stated it) and with so much spin out there if you want to make that point, IMO, you have to give me the direct quotes from Zuckerberg and Dorsey. I don't want somebodies spin as to what they said, I only want to see what they actually did say. From there I can decide for myself. If you don't want to then fine, but you brought up this point and I am not going to spend time trying to prove it right or wrong. Its your point to support.
The second half of your first paragraph was just nonsense, btw. I am FAR less entrenched in ideology that almost all the guys the post in here.
