Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Finally, the proof we need. Thanks, Gina!
Obviously, people in India aren't helpless vegetables.
There it is! The twitter proof we've been waiting for. I can't wait for those scoundrels to get in trouble.
I hope you realize that's not the point.There it is! The twitter proof we've been waiting for. I can't wait for those scoundrels to get in trouble.
What's a tired bit? I was tagged about some more twitter proof. Was that a tired bit too?I hope you realize that's not the point.
And I get this is your sarcastic way of pointing out the courts suck at fixing election fraud, but it's a tired bit.
No, because the evidence is always new but your response never is.What's a tired bit? I was tagged about some more twitter proof. Was that a tired bit too?
You agree that, if you want proof of anything, you can find it on twitter, right?No, because the evidence is always new but your response never is.
And it’s not “Twitter proof” any more than you hearing something on your cell phone and calling it “Verizon information”.
It’s a conduit, not a source.
So because there is misinformation on Twitter you can’t believe anything you see there?You agree that, if you want proof of anything, you can find it on twitter, right?
Seems to me, a lot of messageboard politicians simply pull stuff off twitter that supports their side and expects it to be treated like supporting evidence.So because there is misinformation on Twitter you can’t believe anything you see there?
Do you see the folly with this argument in light of your desire to get rid of guns?
Seems to me you’re fine blaming the conduit for the content. Twitter doesn’t make any content, assuming there’s no truth shared there is just bias.Seems to me, a lot of messageboard politicians simply pull stuff off twitter that supports their side and expects it to be treated like supporting evidence.
Both sides do it.
Twitter and the like, make it VERY easy to publish professional looking BS. The overall quality of info is poor.Seems to me you’re fine blaming the conduit for the content. Twitter doesn’t make any content, assuming there’s no truth shared there is just bias.
Yes there is crap on Twitter. There is also solidly sourced content.
Again, nothing you said makes 100% of information on Twitter inaccurate.Twitter and the like, make it VERY easy to publish professional looking BS. The overall quality of info is poor.
There are legit sources but people still pick and choose the segments of information with which they agree.
You, and many others, are getting your information from people who say what you want to hear.
Again, both sides do it.
Miranda Devine is one of the best in the businessTwitter and the like, make it VERY easy to publish professional looking BS. The overall quality of info is poor.
There are legit sources but people still pick and choose the segments of information with which they agree.
You, and many others, are getting your information from people who say what you want to hear.
Again, both sides do it.
Are there any anti-Trump twitter stories?
This is on Twitter. Is it BS?Seems to me, a lot of messageboard politicians simply pull stuff off twitter that supports their side and expects it to be treated like supporting evidence.
Both sides do it.
Are there any anti-Trump twitter stories?
I thought the only reason democrats do not want voter ID's is because it is racist?